ABSTRACT
<p><b>Objective</b>To study the influence of povidone-iodine (PI) versus that of the benzethonium chloride wipe (BCW) on semen collection and semen quality of sperm donors undergoing penile skin disinfection and provide some evidence for the selection of disinfection methods for semen collection.</p><p><b>METHODS</b>We used PI from August to December 2015 and BCWs from January to July 2016 for penile skin disinfection before semen collection, with two samples from each donor, one collected with and the other without penis skin disinfection (the blank control group). After semen collection, we conducted a questionnaire investigation on the influence of the two disinfection methods on semen collection and compared the semen parameters between the two groups of sperm donors.</p><p><b>RESULTS</b>Totally, 185 sperm donors were included in this study, of whom 63 underwent penile skin disinfection with PI and the other 122 with BCWs before semen collection. Statistically significant differences were found between the PI and BCW groups in the adaptability to the disinfectant and rigid disinfection procedures (P <0.05), but not in the other items of the questionnaire (P >0.05). Compared with the sperm donors of the blank control group, those of the PI group showed statistically significant difference in the percentage of progressively motile sperm (PMS) (［63.02 ± 3.18］% vs ［61.45 ± 4.78］%, P<0.05), but not in the abstinence time (［4.97 ± 1.79］ vs ［4.7 ± 0.94］ d, P >0.05), semen volume (［4.11 ± 1.54］ vs ［4.15 ± 1.61］ ml, P >0.05), sperm concentration (［110 ± 29.6］ vs ［107.5 ± 31.79］ ×10⁶/ml, P >0.05), or total sperm count (［439.10 ± 170.13］ vs ［434.02 ± 186.91］ ×106/ejaculate, P >0.05), while those of the BCW group exhibited no remarkable difference in any of the above parameters (P >0.05). Among the samples with abnormal semen quality, significantly fewer were found with abnormal PMS in the BCW than in the PI group (1.64% ［2/122］ vs 9.68% ［6/62］, P <0.05). However, there were no significant differences between the PI and BCW groups in the abnormal semen volume, abnormal sperm concentration, or the rate of semen bacterial contamination (P >0.05).</p><p><b>CONCLUSIONS</b>Before semen collection from donors, penile skin disinfection with povidone-iodine may affect both the semen collection process and the quality of donor sperm, while the benzethonium chloride wipe can reduce the influence on the semen collection process and does not affect the semen parameters.</p>
Subject(s)
Humans , Male , Anti-Infective Agents, Local , Benzethonium , Disinfection , Methods , Penis , Povidone-Iodine , Semen , Semen Analysis , Skin , Sperm Count , Sperm Retrieval , Spermatozoa , Tissue DonorsABSTRACT
Objective To investigate the current status of preoperative skin preparation in abdominal surgery in China,and put forward suggestions for improvement.Methods From April to May,2016,187 secondary and above hospitals in China were selected,questionnaires were used to investigate the methods for hair removal,skin disinfection on operative field,and application of surgical adhesive drape in abdominal surgery.Results A total of 187 hospitals in 14 provinces were investigated,of which 108 and 79 were tertiary and secondary hospitals respec-tively.87.70% of hospitals performed conventional preoperative hair removal in abdominal surgery,the percentage of conventional depilation in secondary hospitals was higher than tertiary hospitals(93.67% vs 83.33%,χ2 =4.520,P =0.033).85.98% of hospitals selected blade-shaving,7.93% and 23.78% applied chemical depilation and electric depilation respectively.Most hospitals (98.17%)performed skin preparation in the wards,mainly by ward nurses (98.17%),and conducted on the day of surgery (56.10%).86.63%,29.95%,and 3.74% of hospi-tals used iodophor,iodine plus alcohol,and chlorhexidine respectively for disinfecting skin on operative field. 92.51% of hospitals used skin incision/surgical adhesive drape (74.57% used selectively).Conclusion Most hos-pitals in China conventionally perform preoperative hair removal in abdominal surgery,and the primary method for depilation is blade-shaving,nearly half of the hospitals performed depilation on the day of surgery.Iodophor is the major skin antiseptic,surgical adhesive drape is widely used,but it is utilized in limited types of surgery.
ABSTRACT
Objective This article is to discuss the best injection time after alcohol disinfection during the prophylactic immunization,provide theoretical support to guarantee the effect of disinfection in practical work,also guarantee the effect of vaccination especially for the vaccination of attenuated live vaccine at the same time reduce the side effect in disinfection.Methods Choosing the vaccination objects as experimental subject,each period contained 40 people,who were named as group A,B,C,D,E,with a total of 200 people.Using sterile cotton swab sampling and agar plate cultivation method,counting bacteria.Selecting vaccine either in liquid or in lyophilized form,counting the time of picking up the vaccine,dissolving it,suction and preparing the injector.Results After alcohol disinfection,there was 1 person and 1 colony growth in group A within 25 s.There were 1 person and 4 colonies growth in group B within 40 s.There were 3 persons and 3 to 12 colonies growth in group C within 60 s,there were 5 persons and 2 to 8 colonies growth in group D within 80 s,there were 8 persons and 3 to 13 colonies growth in group E within 100 s.The difference between group A,B,C and D was not statistically significant.All four groups mentioned above had significant difference compared with group E.The time of whole process for vaccine either in liquid or in lyophilized form was 1.05 min and 29 s.Conclusions During vaccine injection,especially injectable attenuated live vaccine,it is safe time to finish injecting within 25 to 45 seconds.In the operating process of vaccine inoculation,the freeting and drying dosage-form vaccine,the operation sequence must be set as dissolve the seedlings,disinfection,checkup information again and injections.For water dosage-form vaccine,the operation sequence is to disinfection,pulling out seedlings,checkup information again and injections.
ABSTRACT
OBJECTIVE To study the possibility of applying Anerdian skin disinfectant for blood donor skin disinfection. METHODS Put Anerdian at 21℃,35℃ and 42℃ to exposure in air for 24h,48h and 72 h,detect the volatilization volume,effective iodine and appearance of disinfectant,and evaluate its effect on blood donor elbow by culture method. RESULTS At 21℃ exposure for 24 h the volatilization rate for Anerdian was 5%,effective iodine was 0.215%.At 35℃ and 42℃ exposure for 24 h its volatilization rate was more than 5%,and effective iodine was within the range of 0.18-0.22%.The average killing logarithm value of elbow skin natural bacteria in 30 donors was over 1. CONCLUSIONS Anerdian disinfectant is suitable for blood donor predonation skin treatment.
ABSTRACT
OBJECTIVE To observe the clinical efficacy of two kinds of compound skin disinfectants(compound iodine and Anerdian).METHODS One hundred and twenty recruited patients were divided into three groups randomly,group A(compound iodine group),group B(Anerdian group) and control group(iodine tincture group),40 patients per group.The groups A and B were carried on with one-step skin greasing disinfection.The control group was carried on with routine two-steps skin greasing disinfection.The sampling and detection were carried on by The Technological Specification of Hospital Disinfection published by the Ministry of Health.RESULTS The kill ratio of three groups was(95.44?9.45)%,(95.29?7.21)% and(96.24?11.12)%,respectively.Their disinfection qualification ratio was 97.50%,95.00% and 97.50%,respectively.Comparing the kill ratio and disinfection qualification ratio,there was no significant difference among three groups.CONCLUSIONS The disinfection efficacy of two kinds of the compound skin disinfectants are definite,there is no difference comparing with the traditional iodine tincture and ethanol disinfectants,but they are easy to carry on,safe and practical and the time is shorter,saving the time and the labor.It is helpful to increase the work efficiency of the nurse and deserve to be extended in the clinical application.
ABSTRACT
OBJECTIVE To select the superior one from two skin-cleaning disinfection methods so as to reduce the possibility of hospital infection.METHODS The water plus soaps(control group) and Daniel disinfectants(test group) were used separately to clean and disinfect the skin of patients in intensive care unit(ICU).The degree of skin-cleaning of patients and hand pollution of nurses were observed and analyzed.RESULTS The number of bacteria on the skin of patients of the test group was remarkably lower than that of the control group with a statistically significant difference(t=7.94,P