ABSTRACT
BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Evaluating respiratory function is important in neuromuscular diseases. This study explored the reference ranges of the maximal inspiratory pressure (MIP), maximal expiratory pressure (MEP), and sniff nasal inspiratory pressure (SNIP) in healthy adults, and applied them to amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS) patients. METHODS: MIP, MEP, and SNIP were measured in 67 healthy volunteers aged from 21 to 82 years. Reference ranges were evaluated by multivariate regression analysis using the generalized additive modeling of location, scale, and shape method. Thirty-six ALS patients were reviewed retrospectively, and abnormal values of MIP, MEP, and SNIP were determined according to the reference ranges. RESULTS: MIP, MEP, and SNIP were abnormal in 57.1%, 51.4%, and 25.7% of the ALS patients, respectively. MIP and SNIP were significantly correlated with the degree of restrictive pattern and respiratory symptoms. The ALS Functional Rating Scale-Revised score was correlated with SNIP. CONCLUSIONS: This study has provided the reference range of respiratory muscle strength in healthy adults. This range is suitable for evaluating respiratory function in ALS patients.
Subject(s)
Adult , Humans , Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis , Healthy Volunteers , Methods , Neuromuscular Diseases , Reference Values , Respiratory Muscles , Retrospective StudiesABSTRACT
Objective To investigate the sniff nasal inspiratory pressure (SNIP) of Chinese boys. Methods 299 healthy boys aged 5-12 years were measured with SNIP. Their height, weight, and age were recorded. Results The SNIP averaged (76.9 ± 22.6) cmH2O, and was (59.1±14.2) cmH2O, (76.9±19.5) cmH2O, (85.3±23.5) cmH2O and (83.0±22.6) cmH2O in the boys of 5-6 years old, 7-8 years old, 9-10 years old and 11-12 years old, respectively. It was significantly different among boys of 5-6 years old, 7-8 years old and 9-10 years old (P<0.05), but no significant difference between 9-10 years old and 11-12 years old (P=0.55). Regression analysis indicated significant relations of SNIP with age, height, weight and Body Mass Index (P<0.01). Conclusion The SNIP of Chinese healthy boys are different from abroad. It is necessary to establish the Chinese children SNIP reference range.
ABSTRACT
@#Objective To investigate the sniff nasal inspiratory pressure (SNIP) of Chinese boys. Methods 299 healthy boys aged 5-12 years were measured with SNIP. Their height, weight, and age were recorded. Results The SNIP averaged (76.9±22.6) cmH2O, and was (59.1±14.2) cmH2O, (76.9±19.5) cmH2O, (85.3±23.5) cmH2O and (83.0±22.6) cmH2O in the boys of 5-6 years old, 7-8 years old, 9-10 years old and 11-12 years old, respectively. It was significantly different among boys of 5-6 years old, 7-8 years old and 9-10 years old (P<0.05), but no significant difference between 9-10 years old and 11-12 years old (P=0.55). Regression analysis indicated significant relations of SNIP with age, height, weight and Body Mass Index (P<0.01). Conclusion The SNIP of Chinese healthy boys are different from abroad. It is necessary to establish the Chinese children SNIP reference range.
ABSTRACT
@#Objective To investigate the sniff nasal inspiratory pressure (SNIP) of Chinese boys. Methods 299 healthy boys aged 5-12 years were measured with SNIP. Their height, weight, and age were recorded. Results The SNIP averaged (76.9±22.6) cmH2O, and was (59.1±14.2) cmH2O, (76.9±19.5) cmH2O, (85.3±23.5) cmH2O and (83.0±22.6) cmH2O in the boys of 5-6 years old, 7-8 years old, 9-10 years old and 11-12 years old, respectively. It was significantly different among boys of 5-6 years old, 7-8 years old and 9-10 years old (P<0.05), but no significant difference between 9-10 years old and 11-12 years old (P=0.55). Regression analysis indicated significant relations of SNIP with age, height, weight and Body Mass Index (P<0.01). Conclusion The SNIP of Chinese healthy boys are different from abroad. It is necessary to establish the Chinese children SNIP reference range.
ABSTRACT
PURPOSE: Nasal stuffness is one of most common symptom in children who suffer from rhinitis although there is still debates at to the best measurable device. The aim of the study was to evaluate the sniff nasal inspiratory pressure (SNIP) with respiratory pressure meter and compare this with the clinical status of patients. METHODS: We enrolled 57 rhinitis patients who visited our hospital during June 2005 to July 2006. They were treated with intranasal steroid spray (mometasone furoate) for first 2 weeks. To evaluate the outcome of treatment, we used symptom score (SS) and measured the SNIP with respiratory pressure meter (Micro RPM, Micro Medical, Rochester, UK) and also measured peak nasal inspiratory flow (PNIF) with peak nasal inspiratory flow meter (Youlten peak flow meter, Clement Clarke Int., London, UK) before and after the therapy. Skin prick test was performed to all patient to classify the atopic (AR) and non-atopic rhinitis (NAR). RESULTS: Among 57 identified patients (median age, 7 years 9 months), 40 AR and 17 NAR were studied. Most patient showed clinically improvement with 2 weeks intranasal steroid therapy (0 wk SS=4.9, 2 wk SS=1.7 in AR; 0 wk SS=4.5, 2 wk SS=1.5 in NAR, P77.6 L/min, P>0.05). And there was no correlation between SNIP and PNIF measurement. CONCLUSION: The respiratory pressure meter is a useful device to evaluate the therapeutic effectiveness and clinical improvement in pediatric rhinitis patients.
Subject(s)
Child , Humans , Nasal Obstruction , Rhinitis , SkinABSTRACT
OBJECTIVE: To evaluate sniff nasal inspiratory pressure (SNIP) in patients with amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS), to analyse the relationship between SNIP and other pulmonary function test and to verify the usefulness of SNIP in patients with ALS. METHOD: Twenty-eight patients with ALS able to follow command were studied. SNIP and maximal inspiratory pressure (MIP) were measured using respiratory pressure meter in sitting position. Forced vital capacity (FVC) and peak cough flow (PCF) were evaluated using spirometer and peak flow meter respectively. The relationship between SNIP and other pulmonary function parameters were analysed. RESULTS: The mean value of SNIP was -20.7 cmH2O (21.7% predicted) and the mean value of MIP was -16.3 cmH2O (8.0% predicted). SNIP correlated with MIP (r=0.776, p= 0.000). When expressed absolute value, SNIP was higher than MIP in twenty-one of the twenty-eight patients with ALS. Difference of SNIP and MIP was 4.4 cmH2O and it was statistically significant (p=0.001). SNIP and MIP correlated with FVC. SNIP and MIP correlated with PCF as well. CONCLUSION: SNIP in patients with ALS is useful method to assess inspiratory muscle strength in addition to MIP.
Subject(s)
Humans , Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis , Cough , Muscle Strength , Respiratory Function Tests , Vital CapacityABSTRACT
OBJECTIVE: To evaluate sniff nasal inspiratory pressure (SNIP) in patients with Duchenne muscular dystrophy (DMD), to analyse the relationship SNIP and other pulmonary function test and to verify the usefulness of SNIP in patients with DMD. METHOD: Twenty-seven patients with DMD who were able to follow commend were studied. Among them two patients were unable to perform maximal inspiratory pressure (MIP) mesurement. SNIP and MIP were measured using respiratory pressure meter in sitting position. Forced vital capacity (FVC) and peak cough flow (PCF) were evaluated using spirometer and peak flow meter respectively. The relationship between SNIP and other pulmonary function parameters were analysed. RESULTS: The mean value of SNIP was -44.9 cmH2O (41.6% predicted) and the mean value of MIP was -32.9 cmH2O (43.9% predicted). SNIP was correlated with MIP. When expressed absolute value, SNIP was higher than MIP in 23 of the 25 patients with DMD. SNIP and MIP were correlated with FVC. SNIP and MIP were correlated with PCF as well. CONCLUSION: SNIP in patients with DMD is useful method to assess inspiratory muscle strength in addition to MIP and more easier to perform than MIP.