ABSTRACT
Objective:To explore the application of Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire (the edition for parents) (SDQ) in children with hearing impairment aged three to seven years. Methods:From November, 2018 to March, 2019, 85 hearing impaired children aged three to seven years in Ningxia Disabled Rehabilitation Center were tested by SDQ and Meadow-Kendall Social-Emotional Assessment Inventory (SEAI). After six weeks, 14 randomly sampled subjects were retested. Results:The Cronbach's alpha coefficient of the total SDQ was 0.669 and that of sub-dimensions was 0.724 respectively, and that of subscales ranged from 0.275 to 0.657. And the test-retest reliabilities after six weeks were between 0.543 and 0.898 (P < 0.05). The scores of emotional symptoms, conduct problems, hyperactivity/inattention, peer relationship problems, and total difficulties on SDQ were related to SEAI. The detection rate of emotional behavior problems was 22.4%. There was no significant difference between genders and age groups in the scores and the detection rates of emotional behavior problems (P > 0.05). Conclusion:SDQ can be used as a screening tool for the hearing impaired children aged three to seven years.
ABSTRACT
Pais e professores são os informadores mais requisitados na avaliação socioemocional em idade pré-escolar. Todavia, o facto de informadores que interagem com a criança em diversos contextos poderem ter perspetivas distintas coloca, frequentemente, em causa a fiabilidade e validade desses relatos. O presente artigo tem por objetivo rever 22 estudos de 57 identificados, publicados desde 1987 até 2011, acerca do acordo entre informadores dos contextos familiar e escolar, no preenchimento de inventários comportamentais. Os vários estudos sugerem um grau de acordo reduzido a moderado e a inexistência de um informador-chave na avaliação socioemocional, alertando para a necessidade de recolha paralela da perspetiva de pais e professores, para obter um retrato mais completo dos comportamentos. São discutidas as implicações dos resultados para estudos futuros...
Parents and teachers are the most requested informants for preschool social-emotional assessment. However, the fact that informants who interact with the child in different settings may have different perspectives frequently calls into question the reliability and validity of these reports. The present paper intends to review 22 studies of 57 identified, published between 1987 and 2011, about the agreement between informants from home and school settings while completing rating scales. The studies suggest a low to moderate informant agreement and the inexistence of a key-informant in social-emotional assessment, therefore drawing attention to the need to collect the perspectives of both parents and teachers, as a means of achieving a more complete picture of behaviors. Results are discussed in their implications for future research...
Subject(s)
Humans , Male , Female , Child, Preschool , Young Adult , Child, Preschool , Faculty , Parents , Socioeconomic Survey , Bibliometrics , Child BehaviorABSTRACT
Os últimos 30 anos pautam-se por um aumento do interesse pela avaliação do desenvolvimento/funcionamento socioemocional das crianças em idade pré-escolar. Porém, a avaliação dessa população mais nova, com características específicas (exemplo, vocabulário limitado), exige o recurso a uma abordagem distinta da utilizada com crianças em idade escolar/adultos. Nesse contexto, a utilizaçãode escalas de avaliação/inventários comportamentais tem assumido um lugar de destaque. O presente artigo tem por objetivo salientara importância da utilização de escalas de avaliação enquanto medidas do funcionamento socioemocional de crianças pré-escolares. A análise crítica efetuada indica que, apesar de diversas vantagens (exemplo, tempo de aplicação e custos reduzidos), existem também algumas limitações inerentes ao uso desse tipo de instrumento de avaliação (exemplo, tendência de resposta), sendo apontadas recomendações para uma utilização mais eficaz.
The last 30 years are ruled by an increased interest in the assessment of the social-emotional development/functioning of preschool children. However, the assessment of this younger population, with specific characteristics (example, restricted vocabulary), requiresthe use of a distinct approach from the one used with school age children/adults. In this context, the use of rating scales has assumeda prominent role. The present paper aims to highlight the importance of rating scales as a measure of preschoolers social-emotional functioning. The critical review indicates that, despite several advantages (example, brevity and cost efficiency), there are also some limitations related to this kind of assessment instrument (example, bias of response), and recommendations for its efficient use are pointed out.
Los últimos 30 años son impulsados por un creciente interés en la evaluación del desarrollo/funcionamiento socioemocional de los niños en edad preescolar. Todavia, la evaluación de esa población tan joven, que posee características específicas (ejemplo, vocabulario limitado), exige un enfoque diferente de aquel que se utiliza con niños en edad escolar/adultos. En ese contexto, el uso de escalasde evaluación/inventarios conductuales ha pasado a ocupar un lugar destacado. El objetivo de este artículo es poner de manifiestola importancia de la utilización de escalas de evaluación como medidas del funcionamiento socioemocional de los niños en edad preescolar. El análisis crítico realizado revela que a pesar de poseer una serie de ventajas (ejemplo, tiempo de aplicación y costereducido), ese tipo de instrumento de evaluación tiene también algunas limitaciones inherentes (ejemplo, el sesgo de respuesta), porlo que se aportan recomendaciones para una utilización más eficaz.
Subject(s)
Child, Preschool , Social Behavior , Child Behavior Disorders/psychologyABSTRACT
@# Objective To explore the reliability and validity of Meadow-Kendall Social-Emotional Assessment Inventory (SEAI) for Deaf and Hearing-Impaired Students Preschool Version in China. Methods 96 hearing-impaired children were assessed with SEAI, and 30 of them were assessed with Conners Teacher Rating Scale (TRS), 30 by another teacher, 30 by the first teacher 2 weeks later. The data were analyzed with Pearson's or Spearman's correlation analysis. Results For sociable communicative behaviors, impulsive dominating behaviors, developmental lags, anxious compulsive behaviors, items related to deafness, test-retest reliability (correlated coefficient, r) was 0.94,0.55, 0.87, 0.31, 0.74; and Cronbach's α was 0.70, 0.76, 0.76, 0.80, 0.68. The inter-rater reliability was 0.90, 0.58, 0.46, 0.14, 0.55. The subscales of SEAI were correlated (r=-0.36~-0.89, P<0.05) with the subscales of TRS. Confirmatory factor analysis showed that the subscale model of SEAI was reasonable. Conclusion The SEAI for Deaf and Hearing-impaired Students Preschool Version can be used for Chinese hearing-impaired children.