Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 2 de 2
Filter
Add filters








Language
Year range
1.
China Pharmacy ; (12): 1076-1079, 2017.
Article in Chinese | WPRIM | ID: wpr-514928

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE:To investigate the effects and safety of fructose sodium diphosphate on cardiac function,myocardial injury markers,ischemia modified albumin (IMA) and copeptin in patients with acute myocardial infarction (AMI).METHODS:In retrospective study,102 AMI patients were collected from Nanyang Second People's Hospital during Feb.2014-Apr.2015,and then divided into observation group and control group according to therapy plan,with 51 cases in each group.Both groups received routine therapy and symptomatic therapy as intravenous dripping of urokinase+ intravenous pump of heparin+oral admin istration of aspirin.Observation group was additionally given fructose sodium diphosphate 10 g intravenously,bid.Treatment courses of 2 groups lasted for 7-10 d.The changes of cardiac function indexes (LVDd,LVSd,LVEF),myocardial injury mark ers (cTn Ⅰ,CK-MB),IMA and copeptin were recorded in 2 groups before and after treatment.The cardiac function grading,the occurrence of ADR and adverse events were also recorded in 2 groups.RESULTS:Before treatment,there was no statistical significance in above indexes between 2 groups (P>0.05).12,24 h after treatment,LVDd and LVSd of 2 groups were shortened significantly,while LVEF and IMA levels were increased significantly,and CK-MB and copeptin levels were decreased significantly,compared to before treatment;the improvement of observation group was significantly better than control group,with statistical significance (P<0.05).cTn Ⅰ levels of 2 groups were increased gradually compared to before treatment [there was no statistical significance in observation group between 12 h after treatment and before treatment (P>0.05)];the increase of obser vation group was significantly smaller than that of control group,with statistical significance (P<0.05).24 h after treatment,the proportion of cardiac function Killip grade Ⅰ-Ⅱ was 96.1% in observation group,which significantly higher than 78.4% in control group,with statistical significance (P<0.05).No severe ADR was found in 2 groups,and there was no statistical significance in the incidence of ADR (P>0.05).In respect of adverse events,the number of adverse events as severe arrhythmia,re current myocardial infarction,postinfarction angina pectoris and total incidence of ADE in observation group was significantly less or under than control group,with statistical significance (P<0.05),besides there was no statistical significance in mortality between 2 groups (P>0.05).CONCLUSIONS:Routine symptomatic treatment combined with sodium fructose diphosphate in the treatment of AMI can effectively increase myocardial injury markers,copeptin and IMA levels,improve cardiac function and reduce the risk of adverse events so as to improve the quality of prognosis.

2.
Journal of Medical Research ; (12)2006.
Article in Chinese | WPRIM | ID: wpr-566911

ABSTRACT

Objective To investigate the clinical effects of Metoprolol Tartrate Tablets and Sodium Fructose Diphosphate(FDP) :injection in the early treatment of 48 cases of acute myocardial infarction(AMI) patients with thrombolytic therapy.Methods 84 cases of acute myocardial infarction who were in accordance with the indications for thrombolytic therapy in patients were randomly divided into a treatment group(group A,48 cases,treated with Metoprolol Tartrate Tablets and Sodium Fructose Diphosphate Injection) and a control group(group B,36 cases,treated with the conventional therapy).The occurrence of reperfusion arrhythmias,early sighs and symptms,and retoration of myocardial injury were observed in patients after thrombolytic therapy in order to understand clinical effect on the patients with that treatment.Results In treatment group there were decreased incidence of heart symptoms (chest pain,cardiopalmus) and RA(group A,36.1%;group B,71.4%),improved recovery of cardiac muscde enzymogram as compared to control,which was significantly different with control and between treatment groups (P

SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL