Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 1 de 1
Filter
Add filters








Language
Year range
1.
Journal of Audiology and Speech Pathology ; (6): 474-476, 2013.
Article in Chinese | WPRIM | ID: wpr-441445

ABSTRACT

Objective To observe the clinical feasibility of the acceptable noise level (ANL) test ,analyze the effect of different test instructions to the result of Mandarin acceptable noise level test .Methods Twelve young peo-ple (24 ears) with normal pure-tone test and acoustic immittance test (threshold≤15 dB HL) were included in this study .They were randomly divided into two groups with 12 ears in each group .Group A received the same test in-struction firstly and then received different instructions depended on the different translation of English instruction by tester .Group B received the reverse test order .The acceptable noise level(ANL) ,most comfortable level(MCL) and back groud noise level(BNL) were analyzed .Results The average value of ANL was 7 .5 ± 6 .61 and 8 .29 ± 6 .54 dB SPL ;the average value of most comfortable level (MCL) was 83 .58 ± 8 .57 and 85 .41 ± 8 .89 dB SPL ;the average value of background noise level (BNL) were 78 .92 ± 10 .56 and 77 .13 ± 7 .91 dB SPL respectivoly .The difference of MCL ,BNL ,ANL in these two groups were not statistically significant (P>0 .05) .Test method 1 re-sulted in great individual differences in ANL ,which it ranged from -6 .4 to 20 .12 dB S/N .While ANL from test method 2 ranged from 2 .50~20 .12 dB S/N .Conclusion Different test instruction do not correlated to the results of acceptable noise level ,testers can translate the English instruction by different ways so that it is convenient to the application and clinical research of ANL test .

SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL