ABSTRACT
PURPOSE: To report the efficacy of toric orthokeratology lenses in patients with astigmatism within 1.5 D having difficulty in wearing spherical orthokeratology lenses due to the limbus-to-limbus corneal astigmatism. METHODS: Twenty-three eyes of 16 patients with limbus-to-limbus corneal astigmatism who had been wearing toric orthokeratology lenses for more than 6 months were recruited. The uncorrected visual acuity (UCVA), refractive error, and keratometric changes including eccentricity before and after wearing lenses were compared, and the correlations between corneal astigmatism as well as refractive astigmatism and lens toricity were assessed. RESULTS: After wearing the lens, UCVA (log MAR) significantly improved from 0.61 +/- 0.22 to 0.05 +/- 0.08 (p < 0.001). Myopia and spherical equivalent were also reduced significantly (p < 0.001 and p < 0.001, respectively). While Simulated K (Sim K) tended to be more flattened (p < 0.001) and the eccentricity showed significant decrease (p < 0.001), corneal and refractive astigmatism were not changed significantly (p = 0.330 and p = 0.124, respectively). Correlations between corneal and refractive astigmatism and lens toricity were not statistically significant (r = 0.244, p = 0.300; r = -0.051, p = 0.832). No patients showed lens decentration or visual discomfort. CONCLUSIONS: Corneal topography was essential in patients who had difficulty in wearing spherical orthokeratology lenses due to the limbus-to-limbus corneal astigmatism. Toric orthokeratology lenses may be an effective treatment option in patients with limbus-to-limbus corneal astigmatism.
Subject(s)
Humans , Astigmatism , Corneal Topography , Myopia , Refractive Errors , Visual AcuityABSTRACT
PURPOSE: To report the efficacy of toric orthokeratology lenses in patients with astigmatism within 1.5 D having difficulty in wearing spherical orthokeratology lenses due to the limbus-to-limbus corneal astigmatism. METHODS: Twenty-three eyes of 16 patients with limbus-to-limbus corneal astigmatism who had been wearing toric orthokeratology lenses for more than 6 months were recruited. The uncorrected visual acuity (UCVA), refractive error, and keratometric changes including eccentricity before and after wearing lenses were compared, and the correlations between corneal astigmatism as well as refractive astigmatism and lens toricity were assessed. RESULTS: After wearing the lens, UCVA (log MAR) significantly improved from 0.61 +/- 0.22 to 0.05 +/- 0.08 (p < 0.001). Myopia and spherical equivalent were also reduced significantly (p < 0.001 and p < 0.001, respectively). While Simulated K (Sim K) tended to be more flattened (p < 0.001) and the eccentricity showed significant decrease (p < 0.001), corneal and refractive astigmatism were not changed significantly (p = 0.330 and p = 0.124, respectively). Correlations between corneal and refractive astigmatism and lens toricity were not statistically significant (r = 0.244, p = 0.300; r = -0.051, p = 0.832). No patients showed lens decentration or visual discomfort. CONCLUSIONS: Corneal topography was essential in patients who had difficulty in wearing spherical orthokeratology lenses due to the limbus-to-limbus corneal astigmatism. Toric orthokeratology lenses may be an effective treatment option in patients with limbus-to-limbus corneal astigmatism.
Subject(s)
Humans , Astigmatism , Corneal Topography , Myopia , Refractive Errors , Visual AcuityABSTRACT
PURPOSE: To report the efficacy of toric orthokeratology lenses in a patient with corneal astigmatism within 1.5 D having difficulty wearing spherical orthokeratology lenses because of limbus-to-limbus corneal astigmatism. CASE SUMMARY: An 11-year-old boy who wanted to wear orthokeratology lenses had a refractive error of -4.75 D sph = -1.00 D cyl 180 in the right eye and -4.50 D sph = -1.25 D cyl 180 in the left eye. The corneal astigmatism was 1.19 D and 1.19 D, respectively, and limbus-to-limbus corneal astigmatism was observed in topography. After wearing spherical orthokeratology lenses, the patient complained of monocular diplopia and both lenses were found to be displaced nasally. Toric orthokeratology lenses were prescribed for centration of lenses and resulted in significant improvement of uncorrected visual acuity of 20/20, refractive error of +0.75 D sph = -0.50 D cyl 170 in the right eye and +0.50 D sph = -0.50 D cyl 160 in the left eye, and centration of lenses for the 12-month follow-up period. CONCLUSIONS: Toric orthokeratology lenses should be considered if spherical orthokeratology lenses are not effective even in patients having less than 1.5 D of corneal astigmatism because of limbus-to-limbus corneal astigmatism.