ABSTRACT
Objective:To investigate the effect of continuous intracranial pressure (ICP) and brain oxygen partial pressure (PbtO 2) monitoring and guiding treatment after the application of standard large bone flap decompression and microhematoma removal in patients with severe traumatic brain injury (TBI). Methods:A retrospective analysis was done of 41 patients with TBI in Department of Neurosurgery in the Inner Mongolia People's Hospital from January 2018 to May 2020. Patients with Glasgow coma scale (GCS)<8 points were treatesd with microscopical removal of hematoma and contusion brain tissue and standard large bone flap decompression. Intraoperative intracranial pressure and brain tissue oxygen partial pressure monitoring probes were placed. Postoperatively, continuous intracranial pressure monitoring and partial oxygen pressure monitoring of brain tissue were performed, and target-based treatment under ICP and PbtO 2 monitoring was performed. According to the Glasgow Outcome (GOS) score after six months, patients were divided into a good outcome group (4-5 scores) and a poor outcome group (1-3 scores). There were 26 cases in good prognosis group and 15 cases in poor prognosis group. Linear regression analysis was used to further evaluate the relationship between PbtO 2, ICP and GOS score. The measurement data of normal distribution were compared by independent sample t-test. The counting data were expressed in cases (%), and the comparison between groups was adopted χ 2 inspection. The general linear bivariate Pearson correlation test was used. Results:The mean value of PbtO 2 (17.42±5.34) mmHg in the poor prognosis group was lower than that in the good prognosis group (24.65±5.61) mmHg, with statistical significance ( t=4.04, P<0.001). The mean value of ICP (22.32±3.45) mmHg in the poor prognosis group was higher than that (17.32±3.23) mmHg in the good prognosis group, with statistical significance ( t=4.15, P<0.001). Using PbtO 2 and ICP as independent variables and GOS score after 6 months as dependent variable, a regression equation was established ( Y=4.040 X+7.497; Y=-2.549 X+28.63). The mean value of PbtO 2 was positively correlated with GOS scores after 6 months in patients with severe head injury ( r=0.75, P<0.001). The mean value of ICP was negatively correlated with the prognosis of patients with severe head injury ( r=-0.87, P<0.001). Conclusion:The treatment guided by ICP combined with PbtO 2 monitoring is valuable in improving the prognosis of patients with severe traumatic brain injury after standard decompressive craniectomy, and may improve the prognosis 6 months after the injury.
ABSTRACT
Objective To compare the effects of standard decompressive craniectomy (DC) vs.combined cisternostomy on severe traumatic brain injury (STBI).Methods Seventy-two patients with severe brain injury were divided into standard decompressive craniectomy group (control group,n=34) and DC combined cisternostomy group (treatment group,n=38).The clinical parameters from pre-and post-surgery were compared between the two groups.Results There was no statistical difference in clinical data including gander,age,injury causes,GSC score,Helsinki CT score and operative opportunity between two groups before surgery (P＞0.05).The treatment group was inferior in the duration of decompression (2.8±0.4 h vs.2.5±0.3 h,P＜0.05) relative to control treatment group.However,treatment group were superior to control group in the mean time of admission in neuro-intensive care unit (5.54±3.09 d vs.7.24±2.74 d,P＜0.01),the cumulative time of intracranial pressure (ICP) more than 20 nmHg within seven days after surgery(23.2±4.4 h vs.56.8±8.3 h,P＜0.01),Helsinki CT scores at postoperative day (3(2,5) vs.5(2,9),P＜ 0.01)and Glasgow Outcome Scores (GOS) at 3 month after surgery (P＜0.01).Conclusion DC combined with cisternostomy for STBI is significantly better than standard decompressive craniectomy,which is worth further study by multicenter clinical trials.
ABSTRACT
Objective To explore the influence of different methods of bandaging on the postoperative intracranial pressure of patients with severe brain injury patients after decompression craniectomy. Methods The standard decompressive craniectomy was use for the 36 cases of severe traumatic brain injury patients, and the intracranial pressure monitoring sensor probe was indwelled in operaion. Two different dressing methods of elasticity mesh cap and applicator were used for the patients respectively at 0h, 72h, 120h and 168h after operation, and the value of intracranial pressure was monitored and recorded. Result The intracranial pressure of elastic cap were significantly higher than the applicator respectively in operation immediate postoperative 72h, 120h and 168h (P<0.05), the difference was statistically significant. Conclusions The intracranial pressure of elastic cap is significantly higher than the applicator at different times after the surgery group.
ABSTRACT
Objective To approach the operative effect of dural bilaminar saturation in frontal -temporal skull defect repairs after standard decompressive craniectomy.Methods Fifty-two patients with titanium cranioplas-ty in frontal-temporal skull defect were retrospectively analyzed;27 of them adopted dural bilaminar saturation in the first standard decompressive craniectomy(test group);25 of them adopted dural monostratal saturation in the first operation (control group).The operation time,blood loss,postoperative complications in the two groups were compared. The mean operation time:the test group was (65.00 ±8.15)min and the control group was (83.00 ± 10.25)min,there was statistically significant differences between the two groups(t =7.059,P0.05).Conclusion Skull repairs in second standard decompressive crani-ectomy by dural bilaminar saturation,can be shortened the operation time and lessened amount of bleeding.