Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 7 de 7
Filter
1.
Clinical Psychopharmacology and Neuroscience ; : 73-75, 2017.
Article in English | WPRIM | ID: wpr-41573

ABSTRACT

Steroid withdrawal syndrome (SWS) following steroid dependence is becoming a common clinical condition. It may be associated with body image disorder. Though selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors (SSRIs) are found to be effective SWS associated depression, data for this clinical condition is limited. We present a case of SWS associated with body image disorder which improved with mirtazapine. Mirtazapine might be better option than SSRIs in this subgroup of patients for its noradrenergic property and better gastrointestinal profile. More research should explore its efficacy in this clinical condition.


Subject(s)
Humans , Body Dysmorphic Disorders , Depression , Selective Serotonin Reuptake Inhibitors
2.
Journal of Korean Medical Science ; : 337-342, 2012.
Article in English | WPRIM | ID: wpr-143938

ABSTRACT

During the past few years, new immunosuppressants, such as tacrolimus, mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) and basiliximab, have been shown to successfully decrease the incidence of acute rejection, possibly acting as potent substrates for safe steroid withdrawal. Therefore, clinical outcome of 3 months steroid withdrawal, while using the above immunosuppressants, was analyzed. Clinical trial registry No. was NCT 01550445. Thirty de novo renal transplant recipients were enrolled, and prednisolone was slowly withdrawn 3 months post-transplantation by 2.5 mg at every two weeks, until 8 weeks. During steroid withdrawal, 10 patients (30.0%) discontinued the protocol and they were maintained on steroid treatment. Among 20 steroid free patients, 8 patients (40.0%) re-started the steroid within 12 months post-transplantation. By the study endpoint, 12 (40%) recipients did not take steroid and survival of patients and grafts was 100%. In conclusion, in kidney transplant patients, 3 months steroid withdrawal while taking tacrolimus, basiliximab and mycophenolate mofetil was not associated with increased mortality or graft loss. Despite various causes of failure of steroid withdrawal during the follow-up period, it is a strategy well advised for kidney transplant recipients with regard to long-term steroid-related complications.


Subject(s)
Adult , Female , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Anti-Inflammatory Agents/therapeutic use , Antibodies, Monoclonal/therapeutic use , Blood Urea Nitrogen , Cholesterol/blood , Creatinine/blood , Graft Rejection/mortality , Immunosuppressive Agents/therapeutic use , Kidney Transplantation , Mycophenolic Acid/analogs & derivatives , Prednisolone/therapeutic use , Prospective Studies , Recombinant Fusion Proteins/therapeutic use , Tacrolimus/therapeutic use
3.
Journal of Korean Medical Science ; : 337-342, 2012.
Article in English | WPRIM | ID: wpr-143931

ABSTRACT

During the past few years, new immunosuppressants, such as tacrolimus, mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) and basiliximab, have been shown to successfully decrease the incidence of acute rejection, possibly acting as potent substrates for safe steroid withdrawal. Therefore, clinical outcome of 3 months steroid withdrawal, while using the above immunosuppressants, was analyzed. Clinical trial registry No. was NCT 01550445. Thirty de novo renal transplant recipients were enrolled, and prednisolone was slowly withdrawn 3 months post-transplantation by 2.5 mg at every two weeks, until 8 weeks. During steroid withdrawal, 10 patients (30.0%) discontinued the protocol and they were maintained on steroid treatment. Among 20 steroid free patients, 8 patients (40.0%) re-started the steroid within 12 months post-transplantation. By the study endpoint, 12 (40%) recipients did not take steroid and survival of patients and grafts was 100%. In conclusion, in kidney transplant patients, 3 months steroid withdrawal while taking tacrolimus, basiliximab and mycophenolate mofetil was not associated with increased mortality or graft loss. Despite various causes of failure of steroid withdrawal during the follow-up period, it is a strategy well advised for kidney transplant recipients with regard to long-term steroid-related complications.


Subject(s)
Adult , Female , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Anti-Inflammatory Agents/therapeutic use , Antibodies, Monoclonal/therapeutic use , Blood Urea Nitrogen , Cholesterol/blood , Creatinine/blood , Graft Rejection/mortality , Immunosuppressive Agents/therapeutic use , Kidney Transplantation , Mycophenolic Acid/analogs & derivatives , Prednisolone/therapeutic use , Prospective Studies , Recombinant Fusion Proteins/therapeutic use , Tacrolimus/therapeutic use
4.
J. pediatr. (Rio J.) ; 84(3): 192-202, May-June. 2008. tab
Article in English, Portuguese | LILACS | ID: lil-485275

ABSTRACT

OBJETIVO: Apresentar uma revisão atualizada e prática sobre como efetuar de forma segura a retirada da corticoterapia. FONTES DOS DADOS: Revisão da literatura utilizando os bancos de dados MEDLINE e LILACS (1997-2007), selecionando os artigos mais atuais e representativos do tema. SÍNTESE DOS DADOS: Três situações clínicas podem ocorrer durante a retirada da corticoterapia prolongada: insuficiência adrenal secundária à supressão do eixo hipotálamo-hipófise-adrenal, síndrome de retirada ou deprivação dos corticóides e reativação da doença de base. Embora não exista consenso sobre o melhor esquema para descontinuar a terapia prolongada com corticóides, existe concordância quanto ao fato desta retirada ser gradual. Este artigo atualiza o pediatra quanto ao reconhecimento desses problemas e fornece orientações para a suspensão do tratamento prolongado com corticóide. Uma breve revisão da farmacologia dos corticóides também é descrita. CONCLUSÃO: Não existe teste com bom valor preditivo para antecipar o risco de insuficiência adrenal nos pacientes que receberam terapia crônica com corticóide. São necessários estudos prospectivos para avaliar a real incidência desse problema e assim propor estratégias racionais para sua prevenção. No momento, a menos que a integridade do eixo hipotálamo-hipófise-adrenal esteja estabelecida por testes dinâmicos, recomenda-se a administração de corticóide em situações de estresse nos pacientes que fizeram uso de corticoterapia crônica e/ou em doses elevadas.


OBJECTIVE: To present an up-to-date and practical review of how to safely withdraw glucocorticosteroid therapy. SOURCES: A review of the published literature identified by searching the MEDLINE and LILACS databases (1997-2007), selecting the most representative articles on the subject. SUMMARY OF THE FINDINGS: Three clinical situations may occur during glucocorticoid withdrawal: adrenal insufficiency secondary to negative feedback on the hypothalamic-pituitary adrenal (HPA) axis, steroid withdrawal syndrome and relapse of the disease for which the glucocorticoids were prescribed. Although there is no consensus on how to best discontinue prolonged glucocorticosteroid therapy, there is agreement that this withdrawal should be gradual. This article updates pediatricians on how to recognize these problems and provides recommendations on how to safely suspend glucocorticosteroid therapy. A brief review of the pharmacology of glucocorticoids is also presented. CONCLUSION: There is no good predictive test for predicting the risk of adrenal insufficiency in patients who have been on corticosteroid therapy chronically. There is a need for prospective studies to assess the true incidence of this problem and to propose rational strategies for preventing it. The current recommendation is that patients who have been on chronic and/or high dose glucocorticoids should be administered glucocorticoids during stress situations unless the integrity of the HPA axis has been established by dynamic tests.


Subject(s)
Humans , Adrenal Cortex Hormones/administration & dosage , Adrenal Cortex Hormones/adverse effects , Adrenal Insufficiency/chemically induced , Substance Withdrawal Syndrome , Drug Administration Schedule , Pituitary-Adrenal System/drug effects , Pituitary-Adrenal System/physiopathology , Time Factors
5.
The Journal of the Korean Society for Transplantation ; : 197-202, 2008.
Article in Korean | WPRIM | ID: wpr-183778

ABSTRACT

Steroid is a critical component of immunosuppressive regimen. Unfortunately, steroid is associated with numerous adverse effects including diabetes, hypertension, hyperlipidemia, osteoporosis, sodium retention, and avascular necrosis. These adverse effects have prompted trials of steroid withdrawal with introduction of potent immunosuppressive agents in renal transplantation. Although late steroid withdrawal raised acute rejection rate compared with early steroid withdrawal, results of recent trials that used diverse steroid withdrawal protocols suggest good short and long term graft outcomes. But, in patients survival, patients with steroid withdrawal is similar to patients administered steroid. This review summarizes usefulness according to timing of steroid withdrawal and re-exams benefits of steroid withdrawal in renal transplantation.


Subject(s)
Humans , Hyperlipidemias , Hypertension , Immunosuppressive Agents , Kidney Transplantation , Necrosis , Osteoporosis , Rejection, Psychology , Retention, Psychology , Sodium , Transplants
6.
Korean Journal of Nephrology ; : 785-792, 2004.
Article in Korean | WPRIM | ID: wpr-154478

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: The introduction of new immunosuppressants has prompted several trials of steroid withdrawal immunosuppression. However, several groups have reported a higher incidence of rejection. METHODS: We conducted a randomized two-arm, parallel group, open label, prospective study to compare steroid withdrawal (at 6 months post-transplant) regimens: tacrolimus+mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) (FK group) vs cyclosporine+MMF (CyA group). Entry criteria were: first living donor transplant recipient, no diabetes mellitus (DM), no congestive heart failure, no chronic liver disease, and no acute rejection by 6 months post-transplant. The primary endpoint was a biopsy-proven acute rejection episode or treatment failure within 1 year post- transplant. RESULTS: While eighty-seven recipients were assigned to FK (n=43) and CyA group (n=44) before transplantation, seventy-six recipients (FK 39, CyA 37) could taper off steroid at 6 months post-transplant since eleven were excluded due to acute rejection within 6 months post-transplant (FK 2, CyA 3), protocol violation (FK 2, CyA 1), drug change due to side effect (CyA 2) and follow-up loss (CyA 1). After steroid withdrawal, acute rejection episode was 0% in FK group and 13.5% in CyA group (p0.05 in every variable). CONCLUSION: These data suggest that steroid withdrawal are successful in first living donor renal transplant recipients and tacrolimus may be more effective than cyclosporine significantly in preventing acute rejection after steroid withdrawal.


Subject(s)
Humans , Antihypertensive Agents , Creatinine , Cyclosporine , Diabetes Mellitus , Follow-Up Studies , Heart Failure , Hypercholesterolemia , Immunosuppression Therapy , Immunosuppressive Agents , Incidence , Liver Diseases , Living Donors , Plasma , Prospective Studies , Tacrolimus , Transplantation , Treatment Failure
7.
Korean Journal of Nephrology ; : 132-137, 2000.
Article in Korean | WPRIM | ID: wpr-56199

ABSTRACT

Long term use of steroid induces multiple side effects and morbidity. However, SW has been reported to be associated with increased incidence of acute and chronic rejection, and subsequently reduced graft outcome. MMF inhibits the proliferation and functions of lymphocytes, decreases the incidence of acute rejection in organ transplants, and therefore may decrease the graft rejection associated with SW. We tried to withdraw steroid from 21 renal transplants treated with prednisolone and cyclosporine, who had clinically significant steroid induced side effects. Reasons for SW were diabetes in 15 patients (pre-transplant DM 4 and post-transplant 11), moon face 4 and avascular necrosis of femur 2. Prednisolone was tapered at a rate of 2.5mg every 2 weeks and was discontinued. MMF, 1.0-2.0g/day, was initiated at the beginning of SW. The time interval between transplantation and SW was 26+/-5 (1.5-67) months. Mean age was 48(28-61). Two patients developed MMF-induced GI side effects, and were returned to previous immuno- suppressants. In 1 patient, serum creatinine increased during SW, and steroid was re-administered with the restoration of renal function. In 18(86%) of 21 patients, therefore, steroid was successfully with-drawn. At the follow up of 17+/-1(13-24) months after SW, 1 patient with drug incompliance developed chronic rejection. The rest showed stable renal function. Steroid can be safely withdrawn from renal transplants by simultaneous administration of MMF. The long-term safety, however, needs to be evaluated by prolonged follow up studies.


Subject(s)
Humans , Creatinine , Cyclosporine , Femur , Follow-Up Studies , Graft Rejection , Incidence , Kidney Transplantation , Lymphocytes , Necrosis , Prednisolone , Transplants
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL