Comparison of the effect between two methods of digestive tract reconstruction after gastrectomy / 中国基层医药

ObjectiveTo compare the advantages,disadvantages and clinical value of the improved loop the jejunum behalf of the stomach surgery and the P - type jejunum on behalf of stomach surgery.Methods56 patients with gastric cancer were divided into two groups by different ways of gastrectomy alimentary tract after gartrectomy.Patients in observation group( n =35 ) were given the modified loop jejunum on behalf of gastric surgery and patients in control group( n =31 ) received P-type jejunum on behalf of the stomach surgery.The clinical effects were compared between two groups.ResultsThere were no significant differences in surgical time and bleeding volume in 2 groups ( P ＞ 0.05 ).Emptying time [(61 ± 3 ) min] of observation group was longer than that of control group (37 ± 19) min]( t =3.03,P ＜ 0.05 ) ; Each food intake [( 308 ± 44 ) ml] in observation group was significiantly improved compared with control group [(262 ± 34) ml (t =2.55,P ＜ 0.05) ; The times of daily diet [(4.2 ± 1.2) times] in observation group was lower than that of control group [( 5.7 ± 2.3 )] ( t =2.46,P ＜ 0.05 ).The incidence of postoperative complications( 14.3％ ) of the observation group was significantly lower than the control group (42.9％) ( x2 =5.71,P ＜ 0.05).ConclusionOn the terms of 2 ways of digestive tract reconstruction,the improved loop the jejunum behalf of the stomach surgery is superior to the P-type jejunum on behalf of the stomach surgery,which can effectively improve the quality of life of patients and reduce the incidence of complications,but have no complex surgical procedures.

Hyperplastic Polyp Arising from Endoscopic Mucosal Resection Site of Early Gastric Cancer: A Case Report

Hyperplastic polyps are common gastric lesions that are characterized by nonneoplastic epithelial hyperplasia. However, to our knowledge, there are no reports of a hyperplastic polyp arising from an endoscopic mucosectomy site of early gastric cancer. We describe the CT findings with a histopathology correlation in a case of a hyperplastic polyp arising from a mucosectomy site that mimicked polypoid gastric cancer.

Gastric Wall Thickening on Spiral CT after Subtotal Gastrectomy for Gastric Cancer: Comparision between Recurrent Cancer and Benign Thickening

PURPOSE: To determine the features revealed by two-phase spiral CT scanning useful for differential diagnosis between recurrent cancer and benign wall thickening in patients who have undergone subtotal gastrectomy for stomach cancer. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed 25 cases in which wall thickening of more than 1 cm in the remnant stomach after subtotal gastrectomy was revealed by two-phase spiral CT scanning. All cases were confirmed: 11 were recurrent cancer, and in 14, benign wall thickening was demonstrated. We analyzed the CT findings including maximal thickness of the gastric wall, patterns of wall thickening, degree of contrast enhancement seen during the arterial and portal phases, and the presence of perigastric strands. Maximal wall thickness was classified as either more or less than 15 mm, and as either focal or diffuse. We also determined whether lymphadenopathy was present. RESULTS: Mean maximal gastric wall thickness was 18.4 mm in the recurrent cancer group ("group A") and 12.6 mm in the benign group ("group B") . The gastric wall was thicker than 15 mm in 10 of 11 group A cases and in 3 of 14 in group B; wall thickening was focal (n=3) or diffuse (n=8) in group A, and focal (n=13) or diffuse (n=1) in group B, while the enhancement patterns seen during the arterial and portal phase, respectively, were high/high (n=8), low/high (n=1) and low/low (n=2) in group A, and low/low (n=7), low/high (n=4), high/low (n=1) and high/high (n=2) in group B. Perigastric strands were observed in nine cases in group A, but in none in group B, while lymphadenopathy was combined with wall thickening in seven group A cases but in none of those in group B. CONCLUSION: In patients who have undergone subtotal gastrectomy for gastric cancer, two-phase spiral CT findings including maximal thickness of the gastric wall, patterns of wall thickening, degree of contrast enhancement seen during the arterial and portal phase, the presence of perigastric strands, and lymphadenopathy are useful for differential diagnosis between recurrent cancer and benign wall thickening.

Bile Duct Dilatation after Subtotal Gastrectomy in Stomach Cancer: Comparison with Gastroduodenostmy (BillothI) and Gastro Jejunosto my (Billoth II)

PURPOSE: To evaluate the incidence and degree of bile duct dilatation after partial gastrectomy due togastric cancer and to determine any differences between gastroduodenostomy (Billoth I) and gastrojejunostomy(Billoth II). MATERIALS AND METHODS: We retrospectively analyzed the follow up abdominal CT findings in 113patients who had undergone partial gastrectomy without truncal vagotomy or cholecystectomy. In all cases,preoperative abdminal CT findings showed no evidence of bile duct dilatation. Among 113 patients, 41 underwentBilloth I surgery, and 72 underwent Billoth II. No case showed clinical or radiological evidence of obstructivecauses of bile duct dilatation. Among these patients, we decided the criteria for dilatation when this was noted.The grade was either mild (3 -4 mm), moderate (5 -8mm), or severe (over 9mm), as measured at the centralintra-hepatic duct. Extra-hepatic duct dilatation was graded as mild (6 -8mm), moderate (9 -12mm) or severe (over13 mm). We analyzed serum bilrirubin and alkaline phosphatase levels. RESULTS: When the central intrahepatic ductwas measured, 78 of 113 patients(69 %) showed bile duct dilata-tion; 24 of 41 cases(58.5 %) were in the billoth Igroup and 54 of 72 (75 %) were the in Billoth II group. After measurement of the extra hepatic duct, 22 of41cases(53.6%) in the Billoth I group and 54 of 72 (75 %) in the Billoth II group were found to be dilated. Theresults showed a slightly increased incidence of bile duct dilatation in the Billoth, II group but this was notstatistically significant(p>0.05). In the laboratory, total, direct, and indirect bilirubin, as well as alkalinephosphatase levels, were measured. Higher levels were found in Billoth II than in Billoth I but all findings werewithin normal limits. CONCLUSION: Mild dilatation of the bile duct after partial gastrectomy was a not uncommonfinding, and there was no significant difference of incidence or degree of dilatation according to the procedureperformed. If a patient has no clinical symptoms, it appears that clinical it appears that clinical evaluationdoes not require fur-ther study.

Renal Excretion of Gastrografin after Oral Administration: Clinical Significance in Gastric Resection Patients

PURPOSE: To evaluate the clinical significance of renal excretion of oral Gastrografin in gastric resectionpatients. MATERIAL AND METHOD: Seven days affter gastric resection, eight normal volunteers and 30 patientsunderwent abdominal and CT scanning before and 1-1.5 his after oral administiration of Gastrografin. Theattenuation coefficients of the bladder were measured and the maximal attenuation difference between pre-andpost-gastrografin administration was calculated. RESULTS: In the control group, there was no abnormal renalexcretion of oral Gastrografin, though in 83 % of patients(25 of 30), this was demonstrated as focal increase inthe density (> or = 20 HU) of the bladder and/or collecting system, or ureteral opacification. Mean maximal densitydifference was 84.4+/-82.9HU in the patient group (n=24), with renal excretion of enteral Gastrografin and,3.5+/-4.4 HU in the control group (n=7), with statistical significance (Student's t-test, p<0.01). No patientshowed either radiological or clinical evidence of direct leakage from the suture site. Patients who underwenttotal gastrectomy showed a higher maximal density difference than those in whom gastrectomy was subtotal. CONCLUSION: Unless direct leakage is visvalized on fluoroscopy or spot films, renal excretion of oralGastrografin should not be regarded as a sign of anastomotic leakage. Situations other than leakage, e. g.increased mucosal permeability or absorption, or increased bowel transit time in postoperative duration, should beconsidered as possible causes.

CT after Gastrectomy for Gastric Carcinoma: Significance of Soft Tissue Surrounding the Celiac Axis

PURPOSE: To evaluate whether soft tissue surrounding the celiac axis, as seen on abdominal CT imaging after gastrectomy for gastric carcinoma, should be considered as the recurrence of carcinoma or postoperative change. MATERIALS AND METHODS: One hundred and forty-one abdominal CT examinations of 71 patients who had undergone subtotal or total gastrectomy for gastric carcinoma were included in our study. Conventional CT scans were obtained with 1 cm thickness and interval from the diaphragm to the kidneys after contrast enhancement. It was considered that carcinoma had not recurred if findings were negative on UGI series, endoscopy with biopsy and a normal level of carcinoembryonic antigen except for soft tissue surrounding the celiac axis on abdominal CT. We then divided subjects into a recurrence group (N = 20) and normal group (N = 51) and on initial follow-up CT (FU-CT), analyzed the incidence, margin, shape, extent, degree and pattern of attenuation of the soft tissue surrounding the celiac axis in both groups. Since the second FU-CT examination, we observed changes in the soft tissue surrounding the celiac axis. RESULTS: On initial follow-up CT, at mean 308 days after surgery, fifty-five percent(39/71) of total patients (70% (14/20) of the recurrence group and 49% (25/51) of the normal group) showed soft tissue surrounding the celiac axis. The margin was distinct in 12 (86%) of the recurrence group and indistinct in 21 (84%) of the normal group (P < 0.001). Twelve (86%) of the recurrence group showed a nodular or confluent nodular shape and 21 (84%) of the normal group showed a permeative shape (P < 0.001). Extent was unilateral in eight (57%) of the recurrence group and bilateral in 16 (64%) of the normal group. Attenuation was similar to that of the spleen and muscle in seven (50%) of the recurrence group and was similar to that of muscle in 18 (72%) of the normal group. The pattern of attenuation was homogeneous in 13 (93%) of the recurrence group and 21 (84%) of the normal group. There was no significant difference in extent, degree and pattern of attenuation between the two groups. Since the second FU-CT examination, soft tissue surrounding the celiac axis was seen to have changed. In one patient in the recurrence group it had a distinct margin, was nodular in shape, unilateral in extent and showed attenuation similar to that of the spleen. In one patient in the normal group, it had changed and had an indistinct margin, three patients showed a decrease in the amount of soft tissue and eight showed decreased attenuation. CONCLUSION: Follow-up abdominal CT is useful in the differentiation of cancer recurrence and postoperative change, and for observing changes in soft tissue surrounding the celiac axis.