Quantitative analysis of the Stratus optical coherence tomography fast macular thickness map reports.

The cross sectional optical coherence tomography images have an important role in evaluating retinal diseases. The reports generated by the Stratus fast macular thickness scan protocol are useful for both clinical and research purposes. The centerpoint thickness is an important outcome measure for many therapeutic trials related to macular disease. The data is susceptible to artifacts such as decentration and boundary line errors and could be potentially erroneous. An understanding of how the data is generated is essential before utilizing the data. This article describes the interpretation of the fast macular thickness map report, assessment of the quality of an optical coherence tomography image and identification of the artifacts that could influence the numeric data.

Usefulness of Table Parameters of Stratus OCT in Detection of Localized Retinal Nerve Fiber Layer Defects

PURPOSE: To evaluate the usefulness of table parameters of Stratus optical coherence tomography (OCT) in order to detect localized retinal nerve fiber layer (RNFL) defects. METHODS: The present study included 86 glaucoma patients with only localized, wedge-shaped RNFL defects, as determined by red-free RNFL photographs. All subjects were tested fast RNFL scans, using of Stratus OCT. The sensitivity of the clock hour parameter and 11 table parameters of RNFL thickness average analysis were compared. RESULTS: The best parameters in the superior table parameter of the Stratus OCT were Smax, Savg, and Smax/Tavg (sensitivity = 36.7%, 36.7%, 36.7%, respectively). The best parameters in the inferior table parameter of the Stratus OCT were Iavg, Imax, and Imax/Smax (sensitivity = 63.8%, 59.4%, and 50.7%, respectively). However, all were significantly lower than the sensitivity of the clock hour parameter (superior RNFL defect: 60%; inferior RNFL defect: 84.1%). CONCLUSIONS: The usefulness of the table parameters of the Stratus OCT used to detect localized RNFL defects in glaucoma patients is considered low because of its low sensitivity.

Factors Influencing Optic Disc and Retinal Nerve Fiber Layer Parameters Measured by Optical Coherence Tomography

PURPOSE: To determine the factors influence retinal nerve fiber layer (RNFL) and optic nerve head (ONH) parameters measured by Stratus optical coherence tomography (OCT). METHODS: Topographic RNFL thickness and optic disc parameters of 129 healthy Korean subjects of aged 14 to 87 were measured using the fast retinal nerve fiber layer thickness and fast optic disk algorithms of Stratus OCT. One eye of each subject was randomly selected for statistical analysis. Using multiple linear regression, the effect of optic disc area, age, refractive error, and zone beta on each parameter was analyzed. RESULTS: Large discs had large horizontal integrated rim width (HIRW), cup area, rim area, C/D area ratio, and vertical C/D ratio. The thickness of average, superior, inferior, and nasal quadrant RNFL increased significantly with an increase in optic disc area. Average and superior quadrant RNFL thickness, and HIRW decreased with age. Refractive error showed a correlation with the vertical integrated rim area, horizontal C/D ratio, and temporal quadrant RNFL thickness. Gender and zone beta had no statistically significant influence on ONH and RNFL parameters. CONCLUSIONS: This study shows that optic disc size affects most RNFL thickness and ONH parameters. Because of the relationships revealed in this study, optic disc area in addition to age should be considered when the Stratus OCT RNFL thickness and ONH parameters are interpreted.

Comparison of the Results between Heidelberg Retina Tomography II and Stratus Optical Coherence Tomography in Glaucoma

PURPOSE: To evaluate the ability of Stratus OCT and HRT II with Moorfields' analysis to detect localized RNFL defects and to evaluate the accordance of Stratus OCT and HRT II results in glaucoma patients. METHODS: A total of 60 patients (119 eyes) who had localized RNFL defects of either eye in red-free fundus photographs unserwent evaluation by Stratus OCT and HRT II. For the results of Stratus OCT and HRT II with Moorfields' analysis, normal distribution percentiles less than 5% were considered a significant RNFL defect. For each disc, superotemporal and inferotemporal portions were evaluated. The diagnostic abilities of Stratus OCT and HRT II to detect localized RNFL defects were calculated. The results of HRT II were compared with those of Stratus OCT. RESULTS: The overall sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value and negative predictive value to detect localized RNFL defects were 67.9%, 88.9%, 84.3% and 76.5% in Stratus OCT and 67.3%, 64.8%, 62.2% and 69.6% in HRT II, respectively. Compared with Stratus OCT, 67.2% of HRT II results were in accord in the superotemporal portion and 68.9% in the inferotemporal portion. The accordance of detection of RNFL defects between the two instruments in the inferotemoral portion was higher (79.2%) than others. CONCLUSIONS: Stratus OCT with a normative database is a useful aid to detect localized RNFL defects in early glaucoma. If observation of topographic changes of the optic disc with HRT II is added, results will be even better.