Summary of best evidence for emergency target blood pressure management of acute aortic dissection / 中国实用护理杂志

Objective:To evaluate and summary the relevant evidence of emergency target blood pressure management in acute aortic dissection, so as to provide guidance for the evidence-based practice of emergency target blood pressure management.Methods:According to the "6S" evidence pyramid model, the evidence about emergency target blood pressure management of acute aortic dissection in various databases and professional association websites at home and abroad was retrieved, including clinical decision, guidelines, expert consensus, systematic evaluation, randomized controlled trial, cohort study, case series, etc. Two researchers used corresponding literature quality evaluation tools to evaluate the quality of the included literature, extracted and summarized the evidence of the literature above grade B.Results:A total of 22 articles were included in this study, including 6 clinical decisions, 5 guidelines, 7 expert consensus, 1 systematic evaluation, 1 randomized controlled trial, 1 cohort study and 1 case series, forming 37 best evidences, including 9 topics such as target value setting, management strategies, disease observation, medical history collection, monitoring methods, vasoactive drugs, non vasoactive drugs, auxiliary examination, health education.Conclusions:The summarized best evidence provides a reference for emergency medical staff to manage the emergency target blood pressure of acute aortic dissection. It is recommended that emergency medical staff follow the summarized best evidence to formulate an individualized target blood pressure management scheme for patients.

Physician perceptions of blood pressure control in patients with chronic kidney disease and target blood pressure achievement rate

BACKGROUND: Blood pressure (BP) control is the most-established method for the prevention of chronic kidney disease (CKD) progression. However, the ideal BP target for CKD patients is still under debate. METHODS: We performed a survey of regular registered members of the Korean Society of Nephrology to determine physician perceptions of BP control in patients with CKD. In addition, we evaluated the target BP achievement rate using data from the APrODiTe-2 study. RESULTS: Two-thirds of physicians considered the target BP for CKD to be 300 mg/day (33.7%); GFR ≥ 60 (76.4%); GFR < 30 (47.8%); no evidence of ASO (67.8%); and the presence of ASO (42.9%). CONCLUSION: The target BP was lower in patients with higher cerebro-cardiovascular risks. These patient groups also showed lower target BP achievement rates. We also found a relatively lower application and clinical reflection rate of home or ambulatory BP monitoring.

Evaluation of Primary Doctor's Knowledge on Target Level of Blood Pressure in Hypertensive Patients

BACKGROUND: The purpose of this study was to find out whether primary physicians know the new guidelines (JNC VII) of target BP (blood pressure) and whether they educate their patients properly or not. METHODS: We made calls to local clinicians (family medicine (FM), internal medicine (IM), oriental medicine (OM)) under the disguise of the patient's caretaker and asked them the target BP for patients with hypertension without any cardiovascular disease and those with hypertension and DM (diabetes mellitus). We categorized the participants according to sex, age and departments. RESULTS: Out of the 145 clinics, 88 clinics responded (28 clinicians of FM, 30 clinicians of IM, 30 clinicians of OM). Questions on systolic target BP for patients with hypertension without cardiovascular disease, 87 clinicians answered. Among them, 64 clinicians (73.6%) answered correctly to the target BP (< or =140 mmHg), in the order of FM, IM, and OM. Questions on the diastolic pressure (< or =90 mmHg), 78 clinicians answered and all of them answered correctly. On the question of the target BP for the patients and hypertension and DM, 55 clinicians (63.2%) answered correctly to the systolic target BP (< or =130 mmHg) in the order of IM, FM, and OM. Only 19 clinicians (32.4%) answered correctly to the diastolic target BP (< or =90 mmHg) in the order of FM, IM, and OM. CONCLUSION: The clinicians have given less correct answers on the target BP in the patients and hypertension and DM than those with only essential hypertension. In conclusion, local clinicians should be fully aware of the target BP in patients with hypertension associated with cardiovascular disease or other complications. Also they should educate their patients properly.