ABSTRACT
Resumen Objetivo: Determinar seguridad y eficacia del marcapasos temporal mediante cable de fijación activa vía yugular y/o subclavia. Métodos: Se analizaron pacientes desde 2017 a 2021 postextracción de marcapasos dependientes de estimulación. Resultados: Se colocó estimulación temporal en 25 pacientes con una edad media de 68 ± 16 años. La media de duración de la estimulación temporal fue cinco días. No se registró mortalidad asociada a la estimulación temporal, sin embargo en un paciente se presentó desplazamiento de cable y falla de captura a los cuatro días de la colocación. Conclusiones: La estimulación temporal mediante cable de fijación activa es segura y eficaz.
Abstract Objective: To determine the efficacy and safety of temporary pacing with an active fixation lead placed trough the internal jugular vein and/or subclavian vein. Methods: We analyzed a consecutive series of 25 out of 73 patients that had a pacemaker extraction and were pacing dependent requiring temporary pacing with an active fixation lead until the new pacemaker implant, from 2017 to 2021. Results: After extraction 25 patients age 68 years ±16 years, required temporary pacing, the media for temporary pacing was 5 days. There were no mortality associated to temporary stimulation. Only one patient (4%) had a complication 4 days after the implant with capture fail due to a microdislogement requiring reintervention. Conclusion: Temporary stimulation through active fixation pacemaker lead it is safe and effective.
ABSTRACT
Objective This study was purposed to analyze and summarize the vein temporary cardiac pacing therapy in patients with acute inferior wall myocardial infarction complicated by high degree atrioventricular block (AVB) . Methods One hundred and twelve patients with acute inferior wall myocardial infarction complicated by high degree AVB were selected as observation and research subjects, and they were treated by vein temporary cardiac pacing therapy. The safety, availability of different kinds of this surgical methods and the relationship between these surgical methods and complication were observed. Results Three out of 60 patients who were treated by ordinary temporary pacing electrode catheter were suffering from cardiac tamponade. No serious complications occurred when 52 patients were treated by floating temporary pacing electrode catheter. Conclusion Floating temporary pacing electrode catheter have already proved safe and effective in the treatment of acute inferior wall myocardial infarction complicated by AVB, and it could decrease the incidence of serious complications such as myocardial perforation.