Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 2 de 2
Filter
Add filters








Language
Year range
1.
Rev. colomb. enferm ; 7(1): 75-85, AGOSTO DE 2012.
Article in Spanish | LILACS, BDENF, COLNAL | ID: biblio-986854

ABSTRACT

El objetivo principal del presente estudio fue diseñar un programa de intervención cognoscitivo conductual para mejorar la calidad del sueño de cuidadores familiares de personas con enfermedades crónicas. El programa y un manual de aplicación fue el resultado final del desarrollo tecnológico en este primer estudio. Los psicólogos profesionales, los practicantes del área de la Psicología de la Salud y los profesionales de la salud que trabajen en equipos interdisciplinarios y que estén interesados en velar por la calidad de vida de los cuidadores, podrán hacer uso de estos productos. Está conformado por ocho sesiones, formatos de registro y de tareas para la casa. En la primera y la última sesión se sugiere la aplicación de algunas pruebas (pre y postest); en ellas, se emplean: un formato de entrevista estructurada, el Índice de Calidad de Sueño de Pittsburgh, validado en Colombia por Escobar-Córdoba y Eslava-Schmalbach en el 2005, y la Escala Atenas de Insomnio, versión en español validada en México por Nenclares y Jiménez en el 2005, con el fin de realizar una comparación y contemplar las diferencias existentes entre las condiciones de entrada de los pacientes en los diferentes aspectos evaluados y lo que se observa después de aplicado el programa. A partir de la segunda sesión, se plantea el manejo de información sobre el papel del cuidador; el sueño y el compromiso que debe adquirirse para mejorar la calidad del sueño; el entrenamiento en higiene del sueño en técnicas de relajación; la realización de un plan estratégico del descanso y la utilización de reestructuración cognoscitiva. Finalmente el programa propone una etapa de seguimiento, que se plantea en tres momentos, el primero al mes de manera presencial, el segundo a los seis meses y, el tercero al año, por medio de una llamada telefónica. El seguimiento permitirá conocer el mantenimiento de los resultados después de concluido el programa. En el texto del estudio realizado por Orozco, Eustache y Grosso en el 2011, se presenta el programa y Manual completos.


The purpose of this study was to design a cognitivebehavioral\r\nintervention program addressed to improve\r\nthe sleep quality of chronic diseases patient's family\r\ncaregivers. The program represents the final proposal\r\nof technological development, with the intervention\r\napplication manual designed for professional psychologists\r\nand practitioners in the area of Health Psychology.\r\nThe program comprises eight sessions, registration\r\nforms and homework; in the first and last session the\r\napplication of a pre-test and post-test is suggested and\r\nconducted using: a structured interview format, the\r\nPittsburgh Sleep Quality Index, Colombian Version -\r\nvalidated by Escobar-Córdoba and Eslava-Schmalbach,\r\n2005 and Athens Insomnia Scale, Spanish Version -\r\nvalidated in Mexico by Nenclares and Jimenez, 2005,\r\nto make comparisons and appreciate the differences\r\nbetween the conditions of entry of patients evaluated\r\nin the different aspects and what is observed after\r\napplication of the program. Commencing with the\r\nsecond session the information processed is about the\r\nrole of the caregiver, the sleep and commitment of\r\nthe caregiver with the need to improve their quality\r\nof sleep; a training is implemented in terms of sleep\r\nhygiene, relaxation techniques, a strategic plan in the\r\nbenefit of rest and cognitive restructuring. At the end\r\na three time follow-up phase at one month (in person),\r\nsix and twelve months by a telephone call. In the\r\noriginal study by Orozco, Esutache y Grosso (2011)\r\nthe complete program and Manualsare available.


Subject(s)
Psychology , Behavioral Medicine , Chronic Disease , Caregivers
2.
Salud ment ; 28(1): 28-37, ene.-feb. 2005.
Article in Spanish | LILACS | ID: biblio-985875

ABSTRACT

resumen está disponible en el texto completo


Abstract: Panic disorder is a complex phenomenon according to its biochemical and psychosocial etiology. Therapeutic interventions of panic disorder are aimed to promote effectiveness through the combined use of medication and behavioral cognitive therapy. Anxiety is a normal human response. Moderate levels of anxiety are well accepted because they act as an aid to improve performance, and high levels of anxiety are experienced as normal if they are consistent with the demands of the situation. Persons with anxiety disorders complain of experiencing anxiety too often but they seek help also to overcome fears they recognize as irrational and intrusive. From a psychological point of view, behavioral cognitive techniques -such as hyperventilation control, exposure, and cognitive therapy- and structured problem solving have been successful in the treatment of the symptoms associated to anxiety. It is worth to emphasize that graded exposure is perhaps the most powerful technique assisting patients to overcome fearful situations. Cognitions are also important because it has been found that panic attacks occur when people process information in the external environment, as well as internal somatic stimuli, as though they were threatening experiences. In other words, they feel they have no control over their sensations. Panic attacks prevalence in Mexico City is 1.1% in men and 2.5% in women. It is more frequent among 25-to 34- year old single men and married women, with an average scholarity between 7 and 9 years. From a biological point of view, it is suggested that the etiology of panic attacks involves the participation of the serotonergic and adrenergic neurotransmitter systems, as well as the GABA/ benzodiacepine. Studies based on the noradrenergic theory had lead to conclude that panicking patients have more sensitive brainstem carbon dioxide receptors than normal control subjects. At the same time, other lines of work indicate that serotonergic transmission may also play an important role in the genesis of panic attacks. It has been found that patients with panic disorder may have a lower tolerance threshold to methoclorophenylpiperazine response than control subjects because of hypertensive serotonergic receptors. The accumulated laboratory evidence seems to support the idea that panic attacks begin with the stimulation of irritable foci in one of three brainstem areas: the medullary chemoreceptors, the noradrenergic pontine locus coeruleus, or the serotonergic midbrain dorsal raphe. On the other hand, biofeedback is a psychophysiological intervention that allows in the first place for the external control of some of the physical symptoms involved in this disorder, which is later transferred to internal control of psychophysiological cognitions and behaviors that enable the patient to prevent symptom's occurrence. Based on the principles of the General Systems Theory, biofeedback utilizes the concepts of self regulation and disregulation to describe the conditions under wich normally integrated self-regulatory systems may become imbalanced with regard to their positive and negative feedback loops. Technically, all that a person needs to do is to attend to the signals feedback and not to "try" to control them; the effects of a positive feedback loop should occur automatically, without conscious awareness, as long as the person processes the stimuli. Biofeedback has been effectively used in the treatment of essential hypertension, migraine headaches, Raynaud's disease, tension headaches, temporomandibular joint syndrome, asthma, primary dysmenorrhea, peptic ulcers, fecal incontinence, and conditioning of electroencephalographic rhythms, among other problems. The present study reports data from 32 panic disorder outpatients from the National Psychiatry Institute, Mexico City. They were randomly assigned to: Control Group (N = 14): daily doses of 75 milligrams of imipramine. The participants of this group were required to assist to the psychology department in order to obtain a baseline (pre-test and post-test) with the biofeedback equipment. In addition, every two weeks they visited a psychiatrist who verified that there were no collateral effects from the medicament. Experimental Group (N = 18): besides daily doses of imipramine, and visits to the psychiatrist, these patients went through eight multimodal biofeedback and behavioral cognitive techniques which were assisted with relaxation training sessions. All biofeedback sessions lasted 30 minutes divided in six five-minute trails. The first and final trials served to stabilize the biological responses, and the four middle trials were used to give biofeedback and reinforcement to the response being trained in addition to the verbal explanation of the changes occurring on the screen of the computer. All patients were assessed with the Anxiety Sensitivity Index, and with Beck's Anxiety and Depression Inventories. Results showed that patients in the experimental group reported significant lower scores in the anxiety sensitivity index than the control group. Post-test differences showed that the electromiographic and electrodermic activity from the experimental group was lower than the one from the control group. Diaphragmatic respiration training and progressive muscular relaxation and imagery proved to be effective in reducing the symptoms associated to panic attacks. The overall final result is that all patients improved clinically. They verbally reported that the intensity, frequency and evitative behaviors derived from panic attacks had almost disappeared. However, the cognitive factor of anxiety sensitivity changed significanty only in the experimental group. These findings support the hypothesis that clinical improvement results from a symptom "reattribution" which gives them cognitive skills to cope with stressing stimuli. Further studies should reassess the effectiveness of the combined treatment (imipramine and behavioral cognitive techniques). It is also recommended to expand the study to generalized anxiety disorder and to adjust the experimental design in order to incorporate a second phase with neurofeedback as independent variable. Equally important is to investigate the mechanisms of the hypnotic ability and its impact on the clinical improvement of anxiety disorders.

SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL