ABSTRACT
ABSTRACT Objective: To conduct an epidemiologic review, analyzing treatment, evolution, and survival of soft tissue sarcomas. Methods: Retrospective study based on medical records of patient with STS treated by the Orthopedic Oncology Group at the Santa Casa de São Paulo, from 2006 to 2019. Data from 121 patients were analyzed according to age, sex, histological type, tumor location, treatment, previous surgery in a non-specialized service, local recurrences, lung metastases, and survival analysis. Results: The most frequent location was the thigh. Patients who underwent surgery with a non-specialized group had higher rates of local recurrence and those with pulmonary metastasis had a lower survival rate. Conclusion: STS can occur at any age and the prevalence of the histological type depends on the patients' age group. Level of Evidence II, Prognostic Study.
RESUMO Objetivo: Conduzir uma avaliação epidemiológica analisando tratamento, evolução e sobrevida dos sarcomas de partes moles (SPMs). Métodos: Estudo retrospectivo de prontuários de pacientes com SPM tratados pelo Grupo de Oncologia Ortopédica da Santa Casa de Misericórdia de São Paulo, no período de 2006 a 2019. Foram analisados os dados de 121 pacientes referentes a idade, sexo, tipo histológico, localização do tumor, tratamento, cirurgia prévia em serviço não especializado, presença de recidivas, metástases pulmonares e análise de sobrevida. Resultados: A localização mais frequente foi a coxa. Verificou-se que pacientes que realizaram cirurgia com grupo não especializado tiveram maiores índices de recidiva local, e aqueles com metástase pulmonar tiveram menor sobrevida. Conclusão: Os SPMs podem ocorrer em qualquer idade, e a prevalência do tipo histológico depende da faixa etária dos pacientes. Nível de Evidência II, Estudo Prognóstico.
ABSTRACT
Abstract Soft tissue defects around dental implants, such as papilla or volume loss, peri-implant recession and alterations of the ridge color and/or texture, lead to esthetic and functional complaints. Treatments of these defects in implants are more demanding than in teeth because peri-implant tissue exhibits different anatomical and histological characteristics. This narrative review discusses the proposed treatments for soft tissue defects around implants in the current literature. Several clinical and pre-clinical studies addressed methods to augment the quantity of the peri-implant keratinized mucosa. Autogenous grafts performed better than soft tissue substitutes in the treatment of soft tissue defects, but there is no clinical consensus on the more appropriate donor area for connective tissue grafts. Treatment for facial volume loss, alterations on the mucosa color or texture and shallow peri-implant recessions are more predictable than deep recessions and sites that present loss of papilla. Correction of peri-implant soft tissue defects may be challenging, especially in areas that exhibit larger defects and interproximal loss. Therefore, the regeneration of soft and hard tissues during implant treatment is important to prevent the occurrence of these alterations.