CT-guided Transthoracic Needle Biopsy with an 18-Guage Automated Cutting Needle: Diagnostic benefits and safety

PURPOSE: We wanted to evaluate the diagnostic benefits and safety of performing CT-guided transthoracic needle biopsy (TTNB) with using an18-gauge automated cutting needle. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed the medical records of 332 patients who underwent CT-guided transthoracic biopsy with an automated 18-gauge cutting needle for 341 thoracic lesions. The histopathologic results, diagnostic accuracy and complication rate were determined. RESULTS: 316 (92.7%) of 34l lesions were histopathologically diagnosed by CT-guided TTNB. The lesions were malignant in 172 patients and benign in 144 patients. The diagnostic accuracy was 92.9%. The sensitivity and specificity for malignant lesions were 93% and 92.3%, respectively. The sensitivity and specificity for benign lesions were 92.3% and 93%, respectively. TTNB induced complications developed for 54 of 341 (15.8%) procedures. The most frequent complication was pneumothorax (41/341, 12%). Nine patients with pneumothorax (9/41, 22%) required chest tube placement. CONCLUSION: CT-guided TTNB with an 18-gauge automated cutting needle could be useful for making the histopathologic diagnosis of malignant and benign pulmonary lesions as the technique provides a big enough tissue sample for histopathologic examination. The procedure-related complication rate was acceptably low.

Transthoracic Needle Biopsy of Thoracic Lesions / 결핵

In the diagnostic evaluation of thoracic lesions, the image-guided transthoracic needle biopsy was developed, and its role was expanded with the development of cross-sectional detection and characterization of thoracic lesions and advances in biopsy needle design and techniques. Particularly for diagnostic evaluation of solitary pulmonary nodules, transthoracic needle biopsy has emerged as the invasive procedure of choice. This article covers the indication, the pre-procedure preparation, various guidance-modalities and techniques, and complications. COMMENT: Perhaps a little more detail even though it is an abstract.

Percutaneous Fine Needle Aspiration Biopsy for the Intrathoracic Lesions: What is the Meaning of Non-Diagnostic Results?

PURPOSE: To know what is the meaning of non-diagnostic results of fine needle aspiration biopsy (FNAB) and whether repeated aspiration is needed or not in those situations. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We reviewed 1845 patients who underwent FNAB from 1997 to 2001. Non-diagnostic results of the first FNAB were divided into four groups: insufficient number of cells, inflammatory cells, necrotic debris and atypical cells. We analyzed final diagnosis of 531 patients who had non-diagnostic results from the first FNAB. Among them, 207 lesions were re-biopsied because of clinical and radiologic suspicion of malignancy. The diagnostic yield of repeated FNAB was analyzed and compared with the results of the first FNAB. RESULTS: Among 255 cases with "inflammatory cells only" results, 120 cases were confirmed benignancy on follow-up. Twenty nine of 50 atypical cells (58%) were malignant on follow-up. One hundred one of 207 repeated FNAB resulted in the non-diagnostic reports, and 106 of 207 repeated FNAB were diagnosed as specific diagnosis. Among thirty lesions showing atypical cells on the repeated FNAB, 22 (73%) were identified as malignant neoplasms. CONCLUSION: When the specimen of FNAB shows atypical cells, the possibility of malignancy is very high. When the results of FNAB is non-diagnostic in the cases with clinical and radiological suspicion of malignancy, repeated FNAB procedures should be seriously considered and will be helpful for accurate specific diagnosis.