ABSTRACT
OBJECTIVE@#To analyze the effectiveness and safety of one stage three column osteotomy in treatment of scoliosis with split spinal cord malformation.@*METHODS@#The clinical data of 41 patients with scoliosis and split spinal cord malformation underwent one-stage three-column osteotomy from January 2015 to December 2017 were retrospectively analyzed. There were 17 males and 24 females with average age of (25.14±4.51) years old and the average weight of (65.14±9.11) kg. According to the classification of longitudinal spina bifida, 15 cases of Pang typeⅠwere group A and 26 cases of Pang typeⅡwere group B. The general situations of two groups were recorded ; preoperative and postoperative Cobb angle were observed and the correction rate of Cobb angle of coronal plane was calculated ; the coronal and sagittal torso offset distances were compared between two groups and the trunk balance was evaluated ; the complication of two groups was recorded.@*RESULTS@#All 41 patients were followed up for more than 12 months. The operation time, intraoperative blood loss, and perioperative blood transfusion volume in group A were (610.14±115.02) min, (4 001.12±1 014.33) ml, (3 951.14±1 021.55) ml, respectively, and group B were (520.12±101.14) min, (2 701.57±1 021.45) ml, (2 565.77±880.47) ml, the difference between the two groups was statistically significant (0.05). There was no significant difference in postoperative coronary Cobb angle and correction rate between two groups (>0.05). Immediately after surgery and 12 months after surgery, there was no significant difference in the trunk displacement distance of coronal view and sagittal view between two groups (>0.05). Six patients in group A had complications, which was higher than that in group B of 1 case (=4.885, < 0.05).@*CONCLUSION@#One-stage three-column osteotomy in treatment of scoliosis with split spinal cord malformation has high correction rate and good balance of the trunk. However, for patients with typeⅠsplit spinal cord malformation, they will face longer operation time, more intraoperative bleeding volume, large amount of perioperative blood transfusion and higher risk of complications, and the safety is not as good as that of typeⅡpatients. Therefore, in the actual treatment of scoliosis, especially for those with typeⅠsplit spinal cord malformation, a more reasonable surgical plan should be developed in combination with the actual situations of the patients, so as to improve the safety of the operation.
ABSTRACT
The correction of rigid spinal deformities in adult patients can require a three-column osteotomy (pedicle subtraction osteotomy [PSO] or vertebral column resection [VCR]) to obtain spinal balance. Unfortunately, the existing adult deformity literature frequently reports the outcomes and complications of these procedures together even though VCR is a more extensive procedure with potentially higher rates of complications. We sought to address this shortcoming and provide clinicians with an overview of the existing literature regarding VCR in adult patients. The goals of this review are: to determine the rate of overall and neurologic complications following VCR, the rate of complications with VCR compared to PSO, and the impact of VCR on clinical and radiographic outcomes. An electronic literature search was used to identify studies reporting outcomes or complications following VCR in adult patients. Raw data on patient demographics, case information, radiographic outcomes, complications and clinical outcomes were extracted. Data were pooled to report a rate of overall complications and neurologic complications. A pooled relative risk of complications following PSO vs. VCR was also calculated. Eleven retrospective studies (Level IV) met our inclusion criteria. The overall rate of complications was 69.2%. The reoperation rate was 9.6%. The rate of neurologic complications was 13.3% (range, 6.3% to 15.8%) with most cases being transient. The rate of permanent neurologic deficits was 2.0%. We found a significantly higher rate of all complications with VCR compared to PSO (relative risk, 1.36; 95% confidence interval, 1.24-1.49; p<0.001). All studies reporting clinical outcomes showed significant improvements in functional outcome postoperatively.