ABSTRACT
INTRODUCCIÓN El error técnico más común durante la reconstrucción del ligamento cruzado anterior (LCA) es la ubicación incorrecta del túnel. Es incierto si un túnel tibial mal ubicado puede corregirse en el intraoperatorio. OBJETIVO Medir el desplazamiento del injerto de tejido blando con tornillos de interferencia tibial.MATERIALES Y MÉTODOS Estudio experimental ex vivo en 28 rodillas porcinas. Se cosechó el tendón flexor de la extremidad posterior, que fue duplicado y dimensionado para que pasara a través de un túnel tibial mal posicionado. Las muestras se dividieron en 4 grupos según el cuadrante de entrada (anterior [A], posterior [P], medial [M], o lateral [L]) de un tornillo de interferencia tibial de 9 mm con relación al injerto. Se ubicó una regla milimétrica en la meseta tibial, la cual fue fotografiada con una cámara EOS T6 (Canon Inc., Ota, Tokio, Japón), y la imagen fue digitalizada, y puesta en escala a tamaño. La distancia y dirección de los desplazamientos del injerto se midieron con Adobe Photoshop CC 2019 (San José, CA, EEUU). Se analizaron las diferencias medias entre los grupos por análisis de la varianza (analysis of variance, ANOVA, en inglés) unidireccional. El análisis estadístico se realizó con el programa Statistical Package for the Social Sciences (IBM SPSS Statistics for Windows, IBM Corp., Armonk, NY, EEUU), versión 25.0 (p ≤ 0,05)).RESULTADOS La distancias medias de los desplazamientos del injerto fueron similares en todos los grupos: A 4,4 mm; P 4,6 mm; M 4,5 mm; y L 4,3 mm, sin diferencias estadísticamente significativas (p = 0,894). Las direcciones medias de los desplazamientos del injerto también fueron similares entre los 4 grupos: A 176° (desviación estándar [DE]: ± 15,4°); P 165° (DE: ± 16,6°); M 166° (DE: ± 12,1°); y L 169° (DE: ± 10,6°). No se encontraron diferencias estadísticamente significativas (p = 0.42).CONCLUSIONES Independientemente del cuadrante de entrada, se observó un desplazamiento constante del injerto hacia el lado opuesto cuando el tornillo tibial alcanzaba la superficie articular. Relevancia clínica: el tornillo tibial mal posicionado puede corregirse en el intraoperatorio con fijación proximal en cuadrante específico, y debe alcanzar la superficie articular para generar un desplazamiento efectivo del injerto. Sin embargo, no podemos predecir la magnitud de error en todos los túneles mal brocados, que debe ser evaluada caso a caso.
BACKGROUND The most common technical error during anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction is incorrect tunnel placement. It remains unclear if a misplaced tibial tunnel may be corrected intraoperatively. AIM To measure the displacement of soft-tissue grafts with tibial interference screws. MATERIALS AND METHODS Ex-vivo experimental study in 28 porcine knees. The flexor tendon of the posterior limb was harvested, doubled and sized to fit through a 9-mm misplaced tibial tunnel. The specimens were divided into 4 groups according to the quadrant of entry (anterior [A], posterior [P], medial [M], or lateral [L]) of a 9-mm tibial interference screw in relation to the graft. A millimetric ruler was placed at the tibial plateau, which was photographed with a an EOS T6 (Canon Inc., Ota, Tokio, Japan) camera, and the image was digitalized and scaled to size. The length and direction of the graft displacements were measured with Adobe Photoshop CC 2019 (San José, CA, US). The mean differences among the groups were analyzed through one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA). The statistical analysis was performed using the Statistical Package for the Social Sciences (IBM SPSS Statistics for Windows, IBM Corp., Armonk, NY, US) software, version 25.0 (p 0.05) RESULTS The mean lengths of the graft displacements were similar among the groups: A 4.4 mm; P 4.6 mm; M 4.5 mm; and L 4.3 mm, without statistically significant differences (p » 0.894). The mean directions of the graft displacements were also similar among the groups: A 176° (standard deviation [SD]: 15.4°); P 165° (SD: 16.6°); M 166° (SD: 12.1°); and L 169° (SD: 10.6°). No statistically significant differences were found (p » 0.42). CONCLUSIONS Regardless of the entry quadrant, constant graft displacement to the opposite side was observed when the tibial screw reached the articular surface. Clinical relevance: a misplaced tibial tunnel may be corrected intraoperatively with a quadrantspecific screw, which must reach the articular surface to produce an effective graft displacement. Nevertheless, we cannot predict the magnitude of this error in every poorly-drilled tibial tunnel; it should be assessed case by case.
Subject(s)
Animals , Tibia/surgery , Tibia/transplantation , Orthopedic Procedures/methods , Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction/methods , Swine , Bone Screws , Tissue TransplantationABSTRACT
Objective:To measure the anatomical parameters of the simulated low tibial tunnel of posterior cruciate ligament (PCL) based on knee CT images so as to provide clinical reference for accurate location of the tunnel.Methods:The CT images of 201 healthy knee joints collected at Department of Orthopedics, The Second Hospital of Lanzhou University from June 2016 to September 2021 were used for simulation of the PCL low tibial tunnel. The anatomical parameters of the tibial tunnel were measured using the RadiAnt DICOM Viewer. The primary measures included the angle between tibial plateau and tibial tunnel (ATPT) and the perpendicular distances from the tibial tunnel entrance and exit point to the tibial plateau (L1 and L2). The secondary measures included the angle between tibial plateau and posterior slope (PSA), the angle between tibial anatomical axis and central line of tibial tunnel (ATAA), the angle between posterior tibial slope line and the central line of tibial tunnel (APST), the anterior and posterior diameter of tibial plateau (APD), the length of posterior tibial slope (LPTS), and the length of tibial tunnel (LTT). The measurement results were analyzed according to the body height (divided into 3 groups: a 1.00 to 1.60 m group, a 1.61 to 1.70 m group, and a ≥1.71 m group) and gender using the software IBM SPSS 26.Results:The primary measures: ATPT was 37.0°±4.5°, and L1 and L2 were respectively (57.8±7.4) mm and (34.5±3.3) mm. The secondary measures: PSA 128.1°±5.4°, ATAA 52.7°±4.1°, APST 89.1°±5.9°, APD was (32.9±2.6) mm, LPTS (20.5±2.4) mm, and LTT (40.9±5.7) mm. After grouping by gender, there was no significant difference in PSA between men and women ( P>0.05) while there were significant differences in the other indexes between men and women ( P<0.05). After grouping by body height, there was no significant difference in ATPT, PSA, APST or ATAA between the 3 groups (1.00 to 1.60 m group, 1.61 to 1.70 m group and ≥1.71 m group) ( P>0.05) while there were significant differences in L1, L2, APD, LPTS and LTT between the 3 groups ( P<0.05). Conclusions:Based on the knee CT images, the primary measures of PCL low tibial tunnel are as follows: the angle between tibial plateau and tibial tunnel is 37.0°±4.5°, and the perpendicular distances from the tibial tunnel entrance and exit point to the tibial plateau are (57.8±7.4) mm and (34.5±3.3) mm, respectively. Gender and body height are the important factors influencing the above measurement outcomes.
ABSTRACT
Posterior cruciate ligament (PCL) injury is common in sports medicine. Arthroscopic reconstruction of PCL has become a routine procedure to stabilize the knee joint after PCL injury. The location of tibial tunnel during operation is crucial to a successful surgery. This article reviews the current studies on transtibial PCL reconstruction from the aspects of the anatomy related to the tibial tunnel, the anteromedial and anterolateral tibial tunnels, the maximum angle and optimal angle of tibial tunnel, and the anatomical and non-anatomical tibial tunnels, hoping to provide helpful references for the treatment of PCL injury.
ABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Accuracy and repeatability of bone tunnel in anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction has been a difficult point in surgery. As a new navigation technology, electromagnetic navigation system can realize three-dimensional positioning in application, hoping to make up for the mistakes made by surgeons. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the feasibility and accuracy of a new electromagnetic navigation system in anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. METHODS: Totally 30 cases of fresh frozen knee joint were treated with anterior cruciate ligament amputation to prepare knee joint specimens with anterior cruciate ligament rupture. They were randomly divided into two groups, using magnetic channel navigation combined with arthroscopy (navigation group) and traditional arthroscopy (control group). Postoperative lateral radiography of knee joint was performed to observe the exit position of bone tunnel in two groups, to measure the position of the middle of the tibial tunnel on the tibial plateau, to measure the a angle between the Blumensaat line and the axis of the tibial tunnel, and to measure the position of the femoral tunnel on the Blumensaat line. RESULTS AND CONCLUSION: (1) In the navigation group, the lateral X-ray radiographs of knee joint extension showed that the front edge of all tibial tunnels was slightly behind of Blumensaat line, avoiding intercondylar collision. In control group, two cases were located slightly ahead of Blumensaat line. (2) The distance (a) between the Blumensaat line at the level of tibial plateau and the front edge of the tibial tunnel, the ratio of a to width of tibial plateau anteroposterior diameter (c) and alpha angles of tibial tunnel were smaller in the navigation group than in the control group (P < 0.05). This increased the accuracy of tibial tunnel positioning. (3) There was no significant difference in the location of the tibial tunnel between the two groups (P=0.323). However, the range of the central position of the tunnel (38.1 %-53.8%) was slightly lower in the navigation group than that in the control group (30.4%-56.4%). The range of a distance (0.1-3.2 mm) in the navigation group was smaller than that in the control group (-2.1-5.7 mm), and the location of bone marrow tract was more stringent, which increased the repeatability of location tibial tunnel. (4) The position of femoral tunnel was in the position of the posterior upper quadrant (4/4) in all navigation groups and in 13 cases of the control group. The position of femoral tunnel in the navigation group was more backward compared with the control group (P=0.001). The femoral tunnel in the navigation group could ensure the stability of the knee. (5) In the cadaveric knee joint experiment, magnetic navigation technology can be used to assist the location of bone tunnel in anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction, increase the accuracy and repeatability of bone tunnel, but there are still artificial and magnetic channel navigation system errors, which still need to be improved in clinical application.
ABSTRACT
Objective: To evaluate the effectiveness of arthroscopic anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction via tibial tunnel made by three-portal technique. Methods: Between July 2015 and December 2016, 45 patients with ACL ruptures were treated. There were 29 males and 16 females with an average age of 27.5 years (range, 18-42 years). There were 18 cases in the left side and 27 cases in the right side. There were 28 cases of sports injuries, 13 cases of traffic accidents, and 4 cases of other injuries. The average time from injury to operation was 21.6 days (range, 5-36 days). There were 25 cases of simple ACL injury and 20 cases of ACL complicated with medial collateral ligament, medial meniscus or lateral meniscus injuries. The Lachman tests of all patients were positive. The pivot shift tests of all patients were positive with grade Ⅰ in 27 cases, grade Ⅱ in 13 cases, and grade Ⅲ in 5 cases. The preoperative International Knee Documentation Committee (IKDC) score was 70.28±6.12, and the Lysholm score was 63.27±7.62. All patients underwent arthroscopic single-bundle ACL reconstruction, and the tibial tunnel was created through the anterolateral, high anteromedial, and additional low anteromedial approaches. Results: All incisions healed by the first intention. All patients were followed up 18.7 months on average (range, 14-32 months). The three-dimensional CT at 3 days after operation showed that the tibial tunnel positions were accurate and the middle points were located in the 36.81%-43.35% of tibial plateau on sagittal plane. The medial borders of the tibial tunnel on coronal plane were located at the lateral to the medial eminence of the tibia. There were 3 cases of thrombosis of intermuscular vein of lower limbs, 2 cases of joint swelling and pain, and 3 cases of stiffness of knee joint. At last follow-up, the Lachman tests of all patients were negative and the pivot shift test were negative in 42 patients and positive in 3 patients (grade Ⅰ). The IKDC score (92.59±4.36) and Lysholm score (93.15±5.53) were significantly higher than preoperative scores ( t=11.35, P=0.00; t=12.27, P=0.00). Conclusion: Arthroscopic ACL reconstruction via tibial tunnel made by three-portal technique, which was simple and accurate, can obtain the satisfactory function of the knee in the early stage after operation.
ABSTRACT
Abstract@#Medial meniscus root tear (MMRT) is uncommon and is often associated with osteoarthritis during presentation. Whether it is a cause or effect, it is still debatable at this point of time. However, when a combination of injuries occurs in a middle age group patient, a careful examination before offering a treatment is advised. We herein report a case of a middle-aged gentleman suffering from both arthritis and MMRT.
ABSTRACT
Objective To introduce a new posterior-anterior approach used to establish tibial tunnel for all-inside posterior cruciate ligament (PCL) reconstruction and evaluate its short-term therapeutic effects.Methods We retrospectively analysed the 15 patients (15 knees) with PCL injury who had been treated at Department of Orthopaedics,Zhejiang Provincial People's Hospital from January 2017 to January 2018.They were 9 men and 6 women,with a mean age of 46.3 years (from 23 to 60 years).Of them,8 left and 7 right sides were injured.The intervals from injury to surgery averaged 33.6 days (from 4 to 120 days).Their injury was complicated with medial meniscus tear in 3 cases,lateral meniscus tear in one case,lesion of medial collateral ligament in 2 cases and lesion of lateral medial collateral ligament in one case.After preoperative physical examination and MRI confirmed complete PLC tear in all of them,they were treated by arthroscopic all-inside PCL reconstruction in which a new posterior-anterior approach was used to establish the tibial tunnel.Lysholm scoring and International Knee Documentation Committee (IKDC) scoring were used preoperatively and postoperatively to evaluate the knee functions.Results Their follow-ups averaged 8.3 months (from 6 to 12 months).Operation time averaged 55 minutes (from 45 to 70 minutes).All the patients got rid of the knee instability after surgery.All their posterior drawer tests and sag signs turned to be negative.At the final follow-up,their range of motion of the knee ranged from 110° to 130° (average,118°);their average IKDC score was 88.1 ±3.3 (from 82 to 93),significantly higher than the preoperative value (52.3 ±2.1) (P ＜ 0.05);their average Lysholm score was 90.6 ± 3.1 (from 84 to 96),significantly higher than the preoperative value (43.1 ± 2.3) (P ＜ 0.05).Conclusions This new method can avoid neurovascular damage and overcome the killer turn because it provides adequate exposure of the tibial PCL footprint and accurate placement of the tibial tunnel.It is also very convenient because the new posterior-anterior approach can be used to establish the tibial tunnel in all-inside PCL reconstruction without special tools like tibia1 PCL guide and retrograde drill.Its short-term clinical results have proved to be satisfactory.
ABSTRACT
Objective To localize the tibial attachment of the posterior cruciate ligament (PCL) on the magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and provide parameters for clinical PCL reconstruction.Methods We retrospectively analyzed 524 patients with intact tibial PCL attachment who had undergone knee MRI from January 2010 to January 2016.They were 286 men and 238 women with an average age of 35 years (from 20 to 50 years).The size and positions of the tibial PCL attachment were measured on the sagittal and coronal MRI slices.The differences were analyzed between different genders.Results On the sagittal slices,the mean distance from the central tibial PCL attachment to the posterior edge of the tibial plateau was 17.9 ± 3.0 mm and the mean anteroposterior diameter of the tibial PCL attachment was 9.7 ± 2.4 mm,with those for males significantly larger than for females (P ＜ 0.05).The above mean values when expressed as a percentage of the posterior tibial slop were 79.9％ ±4.5％ and 43.7％ ± 9.6％,respectively,showing no significant differences between males and females (P ＞ 0.05).On the coronal slices,the distances from the central tibial PCL attachment to the medial and lateral edges of the tibial plateau were 33.5 ± 3.1 mm and 37.4 ±4.1 mm,respectively,and the mediolateral diameter of the tibial PCL attachment was 12.0 ± 1.6 mm,with those for males significantly larger than for females (P ＜ 0.05).The above mean values when expressed as a percentage of the mediolateral diameter of the tibial PCL attachment were 47.4％ ± 3.2％,52.7％ ±3.1％ and 16.9％ ± 1.7％,respectively,showing no significant differences between males and females (P ＞ 0.05).Conclusions On knee MRI images,the distance from the central tibial PCL attachment to the posterior edge of the tibial plateau is about 17.9 mm,the anteroposterior diameter of the tibial PCL attachment around 9.7 mm,and the mediolateral diameter of the tibial PCL attachment roughly 12.0 mm.These measurements for males are larger than for females.
ABSTRACT
PURPOSE: The effect of sagittal plane angle of the tibial tunnel on the severity of tibial intra-articular aperture expansion caused by iatrogenic re-reaming in anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction using a modified transtibial technique is unknown. The purpose of this study was to compare the severity of intra-articular aperture widening at different angles (40°, 45°, and 50°) of the tibial guide (TG). MATERIALS AND METHODS: Ninety-seven patients who underwent modified transtibial ACL reconstruction were randomly allocated to TG 40°, 45°, and 50° groups. Intra-articular tibial aperture width (TW) and tibial tunnel length (TTL) were measured intraoperatively using an arthroscopic ruler and a depth gauge. RESULTS: The TG 50° group had significantly greater tibial aperture widening than the TG 40° group. There was a significant difference among TG 40°, 45°, and 50° groups and the percentage of knees with TTL <35 mm was 8%, 9% and 3%, respectively. There were 2 females with TTL <35 mm in TG 40° and 45° groups each. The average mediolateral length of the tibial plateau was 75 mm. CONCLUSIONS: This study shows that the TG angle of 40° would reduce the severity of intra-articular aperture widening of the tibial tunnel compared to 45° or 50° in modified transtibial ACL reconstruction.
Subject(s)
Female , Humans , Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction , Anterior Cruciate Ligament , KneeABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Anatomic tunnel positioning is important in anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstructive surgery. Recent studies have suggested the limitations of a traditional transtibial technique to place the ACL graft within the anatomic tunnel position of the ACL on the femur. The purpose of this study is to determine if the 2-incision tibial tunnel-independent technique can place femoral tunnel to native ACL center when compared with the transtibial technique, as the placement with the tibial tunnel-independent technique is unconstrained by tibial tunnel. METHODS: In sixty-nine patients, single-bundle ACL reconstruction with preservation of remnant bundle using hamstring tendon autograft was performed. Femoral tunnel locations were measured with quadrant methods on the medial to lateral view of the lateral femoral condyle. Tibial tunnel locations were measured in the anatomical coordinates axis on the top view of the proximal tibia. These measurements were compared with reference data on anatomical tunnel position. RESULTS: With the quadrant method, the femoral tunnel centers of the transtibial technique and tibial tunnel-independent technique were located. The mean (+/- standard deviation) was 36.49% +/- 7.65% and 24.71% +/- 4.90%, respectively, from the over-the-top, along the notch roof (parallel to the Blumensaat line); and at 7.71% +/- 7.25% and 27.08% +/- 7.05%, from the notch roof (perpendicular to the Blumensaat line). The tibial tunnel centers of the transtibial technique and tibial tunnel-independent technique were located at 39.83% +/- 8.20% and 36.32% +/- 8.10%, respectively, of the anterior to posterior tibial plateau depth; and at 49.13% +/- 4.02% and 47.75% +/- 4.04%, of the medial to lateral tibial plateau width. There was no statistical difference between the two techniques in tibial tunnel position. The tibial tunnel-independent technique used in this study placed femoral tunnel closer to the anatomical ACL anteromedial bundle center. In contrast, the transtibial technique placed the femoral tunnel more shallow and higher from the anatomical position, resulting in more vertical grafts. CONCLUSIONS: After single-bundle ACL reconstruction, three-dimensional computed tomography showed that the tibial tunnel-independent technique allows for the placement of the graft closer to the anatomical femoral tunnel position when compared with the traditional transtibial technique.
Subject(s)
Adolescent , Adult , Female , Humans , Male , Young Adult , Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction/methods , Femur/diagnostic imaging , Imaging, Three-Dimensional , Retrospective Studies , Tibia/diagnostic imaging , Tomography, X-Ray ComputedABSTRACT
PURPOSE: To compare the results of posterior cruciate ligament reconstructions by tibial inlay and tibial tunnel techniques. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Despite of conservative treatment, all patients (31 cases) had pain and grade 2 or more posterior instability. Posterior drawer test and posterior drawer stress radiography were performed. Clinically, Lysholm knee score and Tegner activity score were evaluated. RESULTS: In the tibial tunnel group, posterior drawer test demonstrated grade 1 instability in 7 cases, grade 2 in 4 cases, and grade 3 in 1 case at the last follow-up. In the tibial inlay group, there was grade 1 instability in 14 cases and grade 2 in 5 cases. On posterior drawer stress radiography, the mean side-to-side difference in measurement of the tibial tunnel group improved from 12.4 mm preoperatively to 4.0 mm at follow-up, and that of the tibial inlay group improved from 11.8 mm to 2.9 mm. Lysholm knee score and Tegner activity score improved to 86.8 points and 5.83 points, respectively, in the tibial tunnel group, and to 88.2 points and 5.84 points, in the tibial inlay group. CONCLUSION: PCL reconstruction with the tibial inlay technique tends to maintain better posterior stability, but there is no statistically significant difference between the two techniques. Further study may be required.
Subject(s)
Humans , Follow-Up Studies , Inlays , Knee , Posterior Cruciate Ligament , RadiographyABSTRACT
PURPOSE: This study compared the surgical results of various posterolateral corner sling methods performed through either the fibula head tunnel or tibia tunnel in patients with chronic PLRI (PosteroLateral Rotatory Instability). MATERIALS AND METHODS: Between January 1999 and October 2003, 20 and 19 patients who had undergone surgery for PCL (posterior cruciate ligament) tensioning and an ALB (anterolateral bundle) reconstruction through the fibula head tunnel or tibia tunnel, respectively and were followed up more than 1 year were enrolled in this study. RESULTS: The fibular head tunnel was found to be superior compared with the tibia tunnel method in terms of the operation time (36.5+/-7.5 versus 68.4+/-12.8) (p<0.0001), rotational stability (p= 0.0018) and IKDC objective score (p<0.0001). In the fibula head tunnel group, 85% of patients had an equal to normal or tighter than normal rotational stability in the tibial tunnel group with 63% having an equal to normal or tighter than normal side at the last evaluation. In the IKDC objective score, 85% of patients in the fibula head tunnel group had a rating B or higher at the last evaluation compared with 79% in the tibial tunnel group (p<0.0001). However there were no significant differences in anteroposterior stability and OAK score. CONCLUSION: The modified posterolateral corner sling through the fibula head tunnel produces better results in terms of a posterolateral rotational stability of grade II chronic PLRL in a combined PCL injury than that using the tibia tunnel method.
Subject(s)
Humans , Fibula , Head , Knee , TibiaABSTRACT
PURPOSE: This study determined that knee extension and its relationship to the slope of the intercondylar roof for positioning the tibial tunnel in ACL reconstructions. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Fifty subjects (25 men and 25 women) between the age of 25 and 40 were recruited for the study. We obtain a lateral roentgenogram of their knees in maximum extension. We measured knee extension angle, roof angle and the location of central axis of the tibial tunnel. We also used statview IV program for statistics. RESULTS: Regression analysis of the measurements from the two authors revealed knee extension (r2=0.846, p<0.0001), roof angle were reliably measured(r2=0.630, p<0.0001). There was a strong relationship between the two authors in their selection of the position for the center of the tibial tunnel(r2=0.702, p<0.0001). There was considerable variety in the degree of knee extension, roof angle and the position of the tibial tunnel. We failed to detect a difference between men and women since the population was insufficient. A correlation between knee extension and roof angle was week (r2=0.207, p<0.008). CONCLUSION: There is variety of extension angle and roof angle of knees among persons. It is required to customize the position of tibial tunnel in ACL reconstructions because of differences in anatomy.
Subject(s)
Female , Humans , Male , Anterior Cruciate Ligament , Axis, Cervical Vertebra , KneeABSTRACT
PURPOSE: We analysed radiographic changes of bone tunnels after anterior cruciate ligament(ACL) reconstruction and evaluated the correlation between measurements and clinical variable. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Fifty patients were examined retrospectively. The interval between surgery and examination ranged from 12 to 48 months with a mean of 18 months. We measured the area and width of tibial tunnel from the radiographs of anteroposterior(AP) and lateral views of the knee after arthroscopic ACL reconstruction using computer program "Image-Pro ExpressRfi". The proximal, middle, distal one third of tibial tunnel area and maximum diameter of tibial tunnel were measured on AP and lateral radiographs. Each measurements were done on immediate postoperative, and postoperative 3, 6, 9, 12, 24, 36 months. RESULTS: The size of tibial tunnel was larger on lateral than AP radiograph. The proximal part was found to be the largest and the size decreased as it moved distally. The area of proximal one third was increased from postoperative 3 months and that of distal one third was decreased from postoperative 3 months. The shape of tibial tunnel area on the last follow-up was cylinder type in 33(66%) and 17(34%) on AP and lateral radiograph, mallet type 8(16%) and 4(8%), reverse bottle type 5(10%) and 11(22%), reverse triangle type 4(8%) and 18(36%) respectively. CONCLUSIONS: The tibial tunnel change was not correlated with clinical variable such as Lysholm score.
Subject(s)
Humans , Anterior Cruciate Ligament , Follow-Up Studies , Knee , Retrospective StudiesABSTRACT
After reconstruction of anterior cruciate ligament, increased idameter of femoral or tibia1 bone tunnel has been obsened on plain radiogram. The etiology of radiographic tunnel enlargement is not well understood and the significance of this tunnel enlargement is unknown. This retrospective study reviewed tibial tunnel diameter in 34 cases of anterior cruciate ligament reconstructions. And we evaluated the correlation between the tibial tunnel enlargement and the position of screw fixation, instability, choice of graft, and clinical results at 1 year postoperatively. AII operation was per formed using a single incision technique. After 3 or 4 months and one year after operation, the diameter of tibial tunnel was measured with digital caliper on the plain radiogram. Tibial tunnel sclerotic margins were measured in the level Of medial tibial plateau on the lateral view of knee. Average tunnel enlargement of 3 allografts was 1.62mm and that of 15 autografts was 2.03mm. No significant difference was seen in KT-10000 arthrometer measurements between enlarged group (amount of enlage-ent >+1 S.D) and not-enlarged group (less than +1 S.D). No coelation was present between the increased tunnel diameter and Lysholm score. Cases with 10mm or more vertical distance between the most proximal point of tihial interference screw and the level of m4eial tibial plateau had average 1.15mm tibial tunnel enlargement and cases with less than 10mm vertical distance ha & I average 2.52mm tibial tunne] enlargement;the difference was not significant (P>0.05). The tibial tunnel enlargement was not correlated with position of screw, clinical results, stability of knee. The tibial tunnel enlargement was not caused hy only mechanical factor such as motion of intra-tunnel portion of graft-tendon.
Subject(s)
Allografts , Anterior Cruciate Ligament , Autografts , Knee , Retrospective Studies , TransplantsABSTRACT
A major cause of less than ideal results following intraarticular anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction has been imprecise nonanatomic tunnel position for graft placement either in the femur, the tibia, or both. Lack of defined constant reference landmarks for reproducible tunnel placement has contributed to this problem on both sides of the joint. The purpose of this study was to define constant anatomic intraarticular and extraarticular landmarks that can be used as definitive reference points to reproducibly create a tibial tunnel for ACL reconstruction that (1) results in an impingement-free graft in full extension; (2) positions the tibial tunnel such that the sagittal tunnel-plateau angle is parallel with the sagittal intercondylar roof-plateau angle in full extension to minimize shear seen by the graft at the tibial tunnel inlet. Preoperative full extension and 90degrees flexion lateral radiographs were obtained. Preoperative measurements of the tibial tunnel-tibial shaft angle and distance from inferior pole of patella to entry point of tibial tunnel were useful tool for impingement free, Blumensaats line paralleling ACL reconstruction with autogenous bone patella tendon bone graft. The average tibial tunnel-tibial shaft angle was 34+/-4.59degrees (male), 33.5+/-3.37degrees (female). The mean distance between patella inferior pole and tibial tunnel entry point was 6.62+/-0.61cm (male), 6.21+/-0.89cm (female). This study sought to define constant anatomic landmarks extraarticularly as well as intraarticularly that can be used to reliably create an ideal tibial tunnel for ACL reconstruction.
Subject(s)
Anatomic Landmarks , Anterior Cruciate Ligament , Bays , Femur , Joints , Patella , Patellar Ligament , Tibia , TransplantsABSTRACT
The roentgenograms following arthroscopic ACL reconstruction show the enlargement of bone tunnels. Many authors hypothesized the cause of the tunnel enlargement, either mechanical or biological causes. The purpose of this study was to find the factors which affected the enlargement of the tibial tunnel following arthroscopic ACL reconstruction with bone-patellar tendon-bone or hamstring tendon. Sixty patients were reviewed retrospectively for radiographic measurement of tibial tunnel at post-operative one year (27 patients received bone-patellar tendon-bone autograft, 12 patients received bone-patellar tendon-bone autograft and Kennedy LAD-ligament augmentation device, 21 patients received Semitendinosus and Gracilis tendons with Endobutton). Roentgenographic anteroposterior and lateral films were checked and the tunnel was measured by two independent observers using a digital caliper. Statistical analysis was performed using a one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) and t-test. The tibial tunnel enlargement was only related to the position of the fixation of the tibial tunnel. We concluded that tibial tunnel enlargement following arthroscopic ACL reconstruction is attributed to the mechanical effect rather than the properties of grafts and the clinical results.