Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 2 de 2
Filter
Add filters








Language
Year range
1.
International Eye Science ; (12): 1286-1289, 2020.
Article in Chinese | WPRIM | ID: wpr-822262

ABSTRACT

@#AIM: To study the reliability of Pentacam, OCT, Tomey OA-2000, IOL Master700, and A ultrasound pachymetry in the measurement of central corneal thickness(CCT)in myopic eyes. <p>METHODS: CCTs of 56 myopic patients(112 eyes)were measured using Pentacam, RTVue OCT, Tomey OA-2000, IOL Master 700, and A ultrasound pachymetry(NIDEK US-500). The difference, correlation, and consistency were statistically analyzed using average values taken from the five devices and the measured values produced by each device. <p>RESULTS: CCTs of 112 eyes were determined using Pentacam(530.17±25.08)μm, OCT(519.79±26.90)μm, Tomey OA-2000(521.75±26.51)μm, IOL Master 700(519.53±28.15)μm, and A ultrasound pachymetry(542.23±26.88)μm. The average value across all five devices was 526.69±26.08μm. The results of root mean square error(RMSE)and theil inequality coefficient(TIC)showed that the degree of deviation from the average of the values measured using Pentacam was the smallest. The other four devices were, from least deviation to most, Tomey OA-2000, OCT, IOL Master 700, and A ultrasound pachymetry. Typical correlation analysis showed that the correlation coefficients between the measured values of Pentacam, OCT, Tomey OA-2000, IOL Master 700, and A ultrasound pachymetry and the average values were <i>ρ</i>=0.957, <i>P</i>=0.950, <i>P</i>=0.953, <i>P</i>=0.930, and <i>ρ</i>=0.949, respectively. The results of correlation coefficient showed that Pentacam and Tomey OA-2000 had the closest correlation with the average value. The other three were, in order of closest to furthest correlation, OCT, A ultrasound pachymetry and IOL master 700. The results also showed that the measurements of Pentacam and Tomey OA-2000 were more reliable, which was consistent with the clinical situation. The results of Bland-Altman analysis showed that the five groups of measurements were closely consistent with the average values, and the CCT measurements of Pentacam and Tomey OA-2000 were the most consistent with the average values.<p>CONCLUSION: Among the five instruments, Pentacam and Tomey OA-2000 produced results that were closest to the average value in CCT measurement, with the best correlation and consistency. Their measurement methods are more objective and safer than A-scan, so they may provide better reference data for clinical practice.

2.
Recent Advances in Ophthalmology ; (6): 845-848, 2017.
Article in Chinese | WPRIM | ID: wpr-607207

ABSTRACT

Objective To compare the ocular parameters measured by 2 biometry devices Tomey OA-2000 and IOLMaster in cataract eyes.Methods A total of 74 cataract patients (74 eyes) were included in this prospective study.Ocular parameters,including axial length (AL),keratometry (K),anterior chamber depth (ACD) and white to white (WTW),were obtained from Tomey OA-2000 and IOLMaster,respectively.Paired t-test was applied to analyze the differences of ocular parameters from Tomey OA-2000 and IOLMaster,while Bland-Altman plot was used to assess the agreement of these ocular parameters.Results The AL,flat K,steep K,mean K,central corneal thickness (CCT),ACD,lens thickness,pupil diameter and WTW values measured by Tomey OA-2000 were (24.26 ± 2.71) mm,(44.09 ± 1.76) D,(45.01 ± 1.73) D,(44.55 ± 1.72)D,(518.41 ±34.18) μm,(3.07 ±0.48)mm,(4.48 ±0.61)mm,(4.07 ±0.95)mm and (11.50 ± 0.52)mm respectively.Values of AL,flat K,steep K,mean K,ACD and WTW from IOLMaster were (24.33 ± 2.69) mm,(44.21 ± 1.74) mm,(45.15 ± 1.76) D,(44.69 ± 1.74) D,(3.04 ± 0.46)mm and (11.65 ± 0.41) mm respectively.The difference values of AL,flat K,steep K,mean K,ACD and WTW between Tomey OA-2000 and IOLMaster were (-0.07 ±0.10) mm (t =-5.99,P<0.01),(-0.12 ± 0.21) D (t =-4.14,P<0.01),(-0.14 ± 0.20)D (t =-5.88,P<0.01),(-0.12 ±0.13) D (t =-7.44,P<0.01),(0.03 ±0.14) mm (t=1.99,P=0.05) and (-0.14±0.32) mm (t=-3.73,P<0.01) respectively.The 95% limits of agreement (LoA) of the AL,flat K,steep K,mean K,ACD obtained from the two devices was 0.27 mm,0.50 D,0.53 D,0.38 D,0.30 mm,respectively,and the agreement was good;95% LoA of WTW was 0.78 mm,and the consistency was poor.Conclusion The differences of AL,K values and ACD between Tomey OA-2000 and IOLMaster were small,suggesting the agreement is unified.

SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL