Quantitative Sensory Test in Normal Adult

OBJECTIVE: To obtain normal data of quantitative sensory test (QST) in Korean adult. METHOD: The subjects were 85 normal adults aging from 30 to 69 years old, who had no abnormal sensory and neurologic problem. We performed following three QSTs on dominant side and one verbal questionnaire. 1) Semmes-Weinstein monofilament wire system (0.05 G, 0.2 G, 2 G, 4 G, 10 G, 300 G) for touch sensation, 2) Rydel-Seiffer Tuning Fork for vibration sensation, 3) TSA-2001 Thermal sensory analyser for thermal sensation, 4)University of Texas Subjective Peripheral Neuropathy verbal questionnaire. RESULTS: 1) Touch perception score measured with Semmes-Weinstein monofilament wire system, declined with age (p<0.01). 2) Vibration perception score measured with the tuning fork, declined with age in foot (p<0.01). 3) Warm sense and heat pain threshold measured with TSA-2001 thermal sensory analyser increased with age, and cold sense and cold pain threshold declined with age. 4) Weight showed negative correlation with vibration perception score in man's foot. CONCLUSION: Normal data of three sensory test obtained from this study could be used for the early detection of peripheral neuropathy or loss of "protective sensation".

Quantitative Sensory Test for the Detection of Diabetic Peripheral Neuropathy / 대한정형외과학회잡지

The aim of this study was to compare widely used quantitative sensory tests to evaluate the diabetic neuropathy(DN). We tested plantar sensation of 40 patients with diabetes mellitus(Group I: 20 with neuropathic symtom, Group II: 20 without symptom) using Semmes-Weinstein monofilament(touch sensation), Biothesiometer(vibration sensation) and EMG. This result was also compared with that of the control group. Eighty percent of Group I and thirty percent of Group II had abnormal EMG findings. Group I had decreased vibration and touch sensation. Comparison of vibration perception threshold(Biothesiometer) with touch pressure sensation(Semmes-Weinstein monofilament) showed that the test with Biothesiometer was relatively accurate, however it was complicated, time consuming and that the test with monofilament was simple and easily performed in the field even though it was relatively crude. 5.07 monofilament could be very effective in the eearly detection of diabetic neumpathy. In conclusion, we recommend 5.07 monofilament as a screening method of diabetic neuropathy and biothesiometer as its follow-up method.