ABSTRACT
Introducción Las fracturas del platillo tibial posterolateral exigen un abordaje que permita una buena visualización de la superficie articular para su restitución anatómica, restablecimiento de la altura y un espacio adecuado para la aplicación del material de osteosíntesis y fijación estable. Hay diversos abordajes descritos en la literatura que no proporcionan la visualización deseada o conllevan múltiples limitaciones y/o complicaciones. El propósito de este estudio es describir una modificación a la técnica quirúrgica de la osteotomía de la fíbula para el manejo de las fracturas de platillo tibial posterolateral. Materiales y métodos Se presentan los resultados clínicos de una serie de casos retrospectiva de 15 pacientes con fracturas de platillo tibial posterolateral que al momento del estudio tenían un seguimiento promedio de 6 meses. Resultados Los resultados funcionales en escala de Lysholm fueron excelentes en 3 pacientes, buenos en 8 y regulares en 4. En todos los pacientes se logró una reducción satisfactoria de la superficie articular de la tibia, sin pérdida de altura de la misma, con alineación adecuada, sin síntomas de inestabilidad, todos con consolidación de la fíbula que no retrasó la rehabilitación, no hubo lesiones del nervio peroneal ni problemas con la piel; se presentó un caso de infección superficial que se manejó con antibióticos orales sin complicaciones. Discusión El abordaje descrito facilita una amplia exposición de la superficie articular, es técnicamente fácil y reproducible, permite la reducción y fijación necesaria, con menor riesgo de complicaciones, con la cual se conserva el aporte vascular de la tibia proximal, se evita el daño a la articulación tibiofibular proximal y se propicia una mayor área de consolidación de la osteotomía. Ésta técnica puede utilizarse sola o en combinación con otros abordajes, para fracturas agudas o crónicas con mala unión. Consideramos que el abordaje con la técnica descrita es una alternativa para el manejo de las fracturas posterolaterales, con resultados alentadores.
Background Fractures of the posterolateral tibial plateau require an approach that allows a good visualization of the articular surface for its anatomical restitution, restoration of height and an adequate space for the application of osteosynthesis material and stable fixation. There are several approaches described in the literature that do not provide the desired visualization or involve multiple limitations and / or complications. The purpose of this study is to describe a modification to the surgical technique of the fibula osteotomy for the management of posterolateral tibial plate fractures. Methods We present the clinical results of a retrospective case series of 15 patients with posterolateral tibial plate fractures that at the time of the study had an average follow-up of 6 months. Results Functional results in Lysholm scale were excellent in 3 patients, good in 8 and regular in 4. Good results were obtained in all patients with a reduction of the tibia articular surface, without loss of height of the same, with alignment adequate, without symptoms of instability, all with consolidation of the fibula that did not delay rehabilitation, there were no peroneal nerve injuries or problems with the skin; There was a case of superficial infection that was managed with oral antibiotics without complications. Discussion The described approach facilitates a broad exposure of the articular surface, is technically easy and reproducible, allows the necessary reduction and fixation, with a lower risk of complications, with which the vascular supply of the proximal tibia is conserved, the damage is avoided to the proximal tibiofibular joint and a greater area of consolidation of the osteotomy is favored. This technique can be used alone or in combination with other approaches, for acute or chronic fractures with poor union. We consider that the approach with the described technique is an alternative for the management of posterolateral fractures, with encouraging results.
Subject(s)
Humans , Knee , Surgical Procedures, Operative , Fractures, BoneABSTRACT
PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to compare the clinical and radiologic results of arthrodesis between anterior approach and transfibular approach arthrodesis in ankle arthritis. MATERIALS AND METHODS: There were 61 cases of ankle arthritis treated by anterior or transfibular ankle arthrodesis in our hospital from April 2008 to March 2012. We investigated 29 cases (27 patients) who underwent ankle arthrodesis with an anterior approach (15 cases) and transfibular approach (14 cases), and were followed for over two years. Clinically, American Orthopaedic Foot and Ankle Society (AOFAS) ankle-hindfoot score, pain visual analogue scale (VAS), and subjective satisfaction degrees were evaluated. In addition, ankle coronal and sagittal alignments were evaluated using plain radiographs at 6 and 24 months, postoperatively. RESULTS: Clinically, preoperative mean AOFAS score and VAS was 41.3 and 6.4, and were changed to 58.9 and 3.3 postoperatively in the anterior approach group. In the transfibular approach group, preoperative mean AOFAS score was 36.6 and VAS was 7.1, and they were changed to 54.9 and 3.4 postoperatively. However, no significant differences in the clinical results were observed between the two groups (p=0.297). Duration of attaining union was 8.1 weeks in the anterior approach group and 10.4 weeks in the transfibular approach group. Complications were delayed union in one case, nonunion in three cases, cancellous screw breakage in three cases, and complex regional reflex syndrome in one case. CONCLUSION: After transfibular ankle arthrodesis as treatment of ankle osteoarthritis, the tendency for valgus angulation of the ankle at the final follow-up was observed and 6.5 mm cancellous screw breakage occurred frequently. Therefore, in order to achieve better stability, it is necessary to use 6.5 mm cannulated screws rather than 6.5 mm cancellous screws for ankle arthrodesis.
Subject(s)
Ankle , Arthritis , Arthrodesis , Follow-Up Studies , Foot , Osteoarthritis , ReflexABSTRACT
PURPOSE: We analyse and report the result of transfibular ankle arthrodesis using lateral malleolar saving procedureversus lateral malleolar sacrificing procedure. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Eighteen cases of transfibular ankle arthrodesis which were performed since 2001 were included. We devided them into lateral malleolar saving and lateral malleolar sacrificing groups. We reattached and fixed lateral malleolus in 10 cases and sacrificed malleolus for morcelized bone graft in 8 cases. We evaluated clinical results by AOFAS ankle-hindfoot score, visual analogue scale (VAS) and radiological results by union time. Complications and subjective satisfaction degrees were also recorded and compared between two groups. RESULTS: Preoperative mean AOFAS score was 32 points (16~41) and VAS was 7.5 points (7~8) and they were changed into 68.6 points (61~77) and 2.8 points (2~4) postoperatively. There was no significant difference in clinical results between the two groups even though lateral malleolar saving group showed higher AOFAS score (69.4) than lateral malleolar sacrificing group (67.7). Duration of getting union was 11.3 weeks in lateral malleolar saving group and 10.6 weeks in lateral malleolar sacrificing group. There was no difference in subjective satisfaction level. There were one delayed union and one nonunion in lateral malleolar sacrificing group and one nonunion in lateral malleolar saving group. CONCLUSION: There was no difference in clinical and radiological results between lateral malleolar saving group and lateral malleolar sacrificing group of transfibular ankle arthrodesis. Therefore it may not necessary to sacrifice lateral malleolus for bone graft except very selective case for which heavy graft is needed.
Subject(s)
Animals , Ankle , Arthritis , Arthrodesis , TransplantsABSTRACT
PURPOSE: We analyzed the clinical and radiological results of transfibular ankle arthrodesis for posttraumatic arthritis. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Eighteen cases of transfibular ankle arthrodesis were followed for more than 12 months postoperatively. Mean age was 55 years, and the mean follow-up period was 2.9 years. Preoperative and postoperative AOFAS ankle-hindfoot scores, operative times, postoperative complications and patients satisfaction level were checked. Radiologically preoperative ankle deformity, time to union, position of fusion, residual tarsal motion arc and degenerative changes of adjacent foot joints were evaluated. RESULTS: At the last follow-up, the mean AOFAS ankle-hindfoot score had increased from a preoperative 41 points to 79 points. Sixteen patients (89%) were satisfied with the result. The mean operative time was 108 minutes. Three cases of chronic tear of the peroneus brevis tendon were treated. Mean time to radiological union was 13.1 weeks. No degenerative changes in adjacent foot joints were observed at the last follow up. Two cases (11%) of nonunion and one case (5.5%) of delayed union were observed. Revision of arthrodesis was performed in one case of nonunion. CONCLUSION: Satisfactory results were obtained after transfibular ankle arthrodesis for posttraumatic arthritis. Long-term follow up is needed to evaluate the effects of ankle arthrodesis upon adjacent foot joints.