ABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Lumbosacral transforaminal epidural injection (TFEI) is an effective treatment for spinal disease. However, TFEI may have several types of complications, some of which can be attributed to intravascular injection. We reviewed studies to compare the intravascular injection rate among different needle types. METHODS: We searched the literature for articles on the intravascular injection rate among different needle types used in TFEI. The search was performed using PubMed, MEDLINE, the Cochrane Library, EMBASE, and Web of Science. RESULTS: A total of six studies comprising 2359 patients were identified. Compared with the Quincke needle, the Whitacre needle reduced the intravascular injection rate (OR = 0.57, 95% CI = [0.44–0.73], P < 0.001). However, compared with the Quincke needle, the Chiba needle did not reduce the intravascular injection rate (OR = 0.80, 95% CI = [0.44–1.45], P = 0.46). In one study, the intravascular injection rate using a blunt-tip needle was lower than that using a sharp needle. In another study, the Whitacre and the blunt-tip needle have similar intravascular injection rates, while, the catheter-extension needle showed a reduced intravascular injection rate. CONCLUSIONS: This meta-analysis showed that the Whitacre needle reduced the intravascular injection rate as compared with the Quincke needle, but failed to establish that the Chiba needle can decrease the intravascular injection rate in TFEI. Moreover, the blunt-tip needle can reduce the intravascular injection rate compared with the Quincke needle, and the catheter-extension needle can reduce the intravascular injection rate compared with the Whitacre and the blunt-tip needle.
Subject(s)
Humans , Anesthesia, Epidural , Injections, Epidural , Needles , Spinal DiseasesABSTRACT
Se comunica un caso de inyección subdural accidental en el contexto de una inyección epidural transforaminal lumbar, con una aparente ubicación apropiada de la aguja. Se describen las imágenes observadas, se analizan las posibles complicaciones de la inyección en dicho espacio, y se discute la conducta a tomar una vez instalada la complicación.
A case on unexpected subdural injection despite apparent proper placement of the needle is reported. The watched images are described, the possible complications of the injection in this space are analyzed, and the proper conduct is discussed.
ABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: We evaluated the effects of combination of a transforaminal nerve root block and an epidural block using corticosteroid and local anesthetics, for the management of radiating pain to the lower extremities. METHODS: Thirty patients who suffered from chronic radiating pain that resistant conservative treatments including epidural steroid injection (ESI) were enrolled. Following a transforaminal nerve root block under fluoroscopic visualization, an ESI was administered at the level of the intervertebral space showing an obstacle to cephalad epidural spread of the dye injected during a transforaminal nerve root block. Twenty to forty mg of triamcinolone with 0.5% lidocaine was injected in divided doses. The patients received these nerve blocks at intervals of 1 2 weeks until the patients were satisfied with the results. If the pain reappeared, repeated blocks were administered at intervals of 2 months. Treatment results were evaluated twice using a pain relief scale and categorized as excellent, good, fair, or poor. RESULTS: Pain improvements of more than 50% of the initial pain intensity, graded excellent or good, were observed in 66.7% at 1 week after the 1st blocks and 73.3% at 3 months after the final blocks. CONCLUSIONS: These findings suggest that a combination of a transforaminal nerve root block and ESI is an effective procedure for radiating pain not responding to ESI. However, comparative prospective studies to determine the effects of this combination therapy versus classical transforaminal injections may be mandatory.