Translaminar Microendoscopic Herniotomy for Cranially Migrated Lumbar Disc Herniations Encroaching on the Exiting Nerve Root in the Preforaminal and Foraminal Zones

STUDY DESIGN: Case series. PURPOSE: The aim of this study was to describe translaminar microendoscopic herniotomy (TL-MEH) for cranially migrated lumbar disc herniations encroaching on the exiting nerve root in the preforaminal and foraminal zones and to report preliminary results of the procedure. OVERVIEW OF LITERATURE: Conventional interlaminar approaches for preforaminal and foraminal lumbar disc herniations result in extensive removal of the lamina and facet joint to remove disc fragments safely. More destructive approaches increase the risk of postoperative segmental instability. METHODS: TL-MEH is a minimally invasive procedure for herniotomy via the translaminar approach using a microendoscopic technique. TL-MEH was performed in seven patients with a cranially migrated lumbar disc herniation encroaching on the exiting nerve root. The disc fragments were located in the preforaminal zone in four patients, and in the preforaminal and foraminal zones in three. RESULTS: All patients experienced immediate relief from symptoms after surgery and satisfactory results at the final follow-up. Surgical complications, such as a dural tear, nerve injury, and surgical site infection, were not investigated. CONCLUSIONS: TL-MEH seemed to be an effective and safe alternative minimally invasive surgical option for patients with a cranially migrated lumbar disc herniation encroaching the exiting nerve root in the preforaminal and foraminal zones.

Effects of Translaminar Approach and Transforaminal Approach in Lumbar Epidural Steroid Injection

OBJECTIVE: The goal of this study was to compare the therapeutic and the functional value between translaminar approach and transforaminal approach of epidural steroid injection in patient with refractory radicular pain. METHOD: Among 31 patients with unilateral herniated nucleus pulposus (HNP) which was confirmed by physical examination and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), 17 patients received a transforaminal approach and 14 patients received a translaminar approach. All patients were evaluated by independent observer and were checked by visual analogue scale (VAS), functional score before and 1 day, 2 weeks and 4 weeks after injection. RESULTS: The VAS of transforaminal approach was significantly lower than that of translaminar approach after 2 weeks and after 4 weeks (p<0.05), although there were no statistical difference before and 1 day after injection. The functional score of transforaminal approach was significantly higher than that of translaminar approach after 4 weeks (p<0.05), although there were no statistical difference before and 1 day, 2 weeks after injection. The translaminar approach needs more frequent injection (p<0.05). CONCLUSION: This study suggests that both translaminar approach and transforaminal approach could be valuable to the initial management of refractory radicular pain, but the duration of therapeutic effects was relatively short in translaminar approach. Transforaminal approach will be the promising treatment of refractory radicular pain, because it has better therapeutic efficacy, safety and longer duration of therapeutic effects than translaminar approach.