ABSTRACT
Objective To compare and analyze clinical effects of Bipolar transurethral plasma kinetic enucleation of prostate (PKEP) and transurethral resection of the prostate(TURP) on the treatment huge benign prostatic hyperplasia.Methods Nine-six cases of huge benign prostatic hyperplasia were selected in this hospital from March 2012 to March 2015.All the patients were divided into two groups according to different operation method,namely PKEP group and TURP group.Then the operative time,bleeding amount,bladder washing time,hospital stay,complications between two groups were compared,and the international prostate symptom score (IPSS),quality of life score (QOL),maximal urinary flow rate (Qmax),residual urine volume 6 months before and after operation were compared between the two groups.Results The operative time [(100.0 ± 3.5)min],bleeding amount [(161.0 ± 9.2) mL],bladder washing time[(15.2 ± 1.2) h],hospital stay[(10.8 ± 2.6) d],complications (6 cases) in PKEP group were less than that in the TURP group,which were(132.0±4.2)min,(198.0±12.1)mL,(36.8±1.3)h,(13.6±2.9)d,complications (18 cases)respectively(P＜0.05).The IPSS,QOL,Qmax,residual urine volume in both group were significantly improved compared with surgery before(P＜0.05),and there were no significant differences between the two groups(P＞0.05).Conclusion PKEP and TURP both are effective surgeries for the treatment of huge BPH,while PKEP has short operation time,less intraoperarive bleeding and low incidence of complications,it is worthy of further clinical promotion.
ABSTRACT
Objective To evaluate the short-term safety and efficacy of transurethral plasma kinetic enucleation of the prostate (PKEP)for benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH)larger than 60 ml. Methods A retrospective analysis was carried out on clinical data and treatment outcomes of 87 cases of BPH with prostate volume larger than 60 ml in Fuzhou General Hospital of Nanjing Military Command from September 2013 to August 2015.The patients were divided into either PKEP group (45 cases)or plasma kinetic resection of prostate (PKRP)group (42 cases).The operation time,resected adenoma weight,decline in hemoglobin 1 day after operation,and catheterization and irrigation duration were recorded and analyzed.The international prostate symptom score (IPSS), quality of life score (QOL),post-void residual urine volume (PVR),maximum urinary flow rate (Qmax)before surgery and 1 ,3,6 months after operation respectively were evaluated. Results As compared with the PKRP group,the PKEP group excelled in greater resected prostate weight [(52.4 ±15.2)g vs.(40.0 ±14.1 )g,t =3.94,P =0.00],less decline in hemoglobin [(9 ±4)g /L vs. (17 ±6)g /L,t =-7.36,P =0.00],shorter irrigation duration [(1 .1 ±0.3)d vs.(1.4 ±0.5)d,t =-3.42,P =0.00],and shorter catheterization duration [(3.3 ±0.5)d vs.(5.5 ±0.5 )d,t =-20.50,P =0.00].There were no significant differences between the two groups in terms of operation time and operative complications such as transient incontinence and hematuria (P >0.05).Postoperative improvements in IPSS,QOL,PVR,and Qmax were similar between the two groups (P >0.05)but significantly improved as compared with before operation (P <0.05). Conclusion PKEP is a new,safe,and effective minimal invasive surgical option for the treatment of BPH larger than 60 ml.