ABSTRACT
Background: Globally, there is an increased trend of cesarean section (CS). Repeat CS is associated with various complications. Successful vaginal birth after caesarean section (VBAC) helps to decrease CS rate and its associated morbidities. Practice of protocol of applying FLAMM score and monitoring by partogram reduces the rate of cesarean section in the previous one lower segment cesarean section patient. Aims and Objectives: The present study is conducted to evaluate the impact of FLAMM scoring for vaginal birth after CS on obstetrics and perinatal outcome in case of the previous one lower segment CS delivery. Materials and Methods: The prospective and observational study was conducted in Obstetrics and Gynaecology department of one of the teaching institutes of Ahmedabad over a period of 1 year. Total 100 pregnant women from labour room with history of the previous one CS, who gave consent for trial of labor after the previous cesarean (TOLAC) were selected and FLAMM score applied on them. Study participants were divided in two groups according to outcome. Group A: Successful TOLAC and Group B: Failed TOLAC. Maternal and neonatal outcome was measured in both groups. Results: Out of 98 patients <40 years, 74.48% had VBAC and 25% had failed TOLAC and two patients were >40 years of age had VBAC. Out of 94 patients with favorable FLAMM’s score, 79% (n = 75) had VBAC and 100% (n = 6) with unfavorable FLAMM had CS. Conclusion: Careful patient selection for TOLAC is of utmost priority to increase success rate and decrease complications. FLAMM scoring system is a very efficient guiding tool for this. By applying FLAMM score, we increase success rate of TOLAC and thereby decrease CS rate in case of previous CS.
ABSTRACT
Background: After year 2000 cesareanrates have increased from 15% to 30-50% worldwide. Practice of Trial of labor after cesarean has decreased from last two decades of 20thcentury. Predictors of vaginal birth after cesarean are not uniform and not suitable equally for all populations. FLAMM model was tested in this study for its predictability for a successful vaginal birth after previous one cesarean. Material And Methods:For an observational, retrospective study 72 patient files admitted in 2018 in Obstetric Department of C R Gardi Hospital were included which fulfille d criteria of having second pregnancy after cesarean for non recurrent indications like fataldistress, failure of induction of labor, pre-eclampsia, eclampsia, twins and others. Indication of contracted pelvis, rupture uterus, previous classical cesarean section; and multiple pregnancy, medical complications and obstetric complications in this pregnancywere excluded. FLAMM scoreparameters; cervical dilatation, effacement, presence of previous vaginal birth before cesarean, indication of it and age of woman wereused. Observations of successful and failed trial were done by scoring system. Chi square test was used to compare data. Study variables were success of trial in various FLAMM parameters. Result:Higher scores in cervical dilatation (p<0.001), effacement (p<0.001) and prior vaginal delivery (p=0.03) were significantly associated with a successful outcome. Higher theaggregate FLAMM score, higher were chances of successful trial. A non-recurrent indication other than non-progress of labor for previous cesarean had no statistical association with success of trial. Aggregate score of 6 and more has 100 % predictability for a successful vaginal birth. Conclusion:Prediction by FLAMM model resulted in 62. 5%successful trial. FLAMM model maybe used for near to accurate prediction of successful trial of labor after cesarean.
ABSTRACT
Background: Nowadays, cesarean sections are increasing consistently. Repeat cesarean sections are performed for a large percentage and associated with a higher rate of surgical complications and Long-term morbidities. The trial of labor after cesarean offers an alternative choice. This study carried out to assess the maternal and fetal outcome and to evaluate various parameters as a predictor of success of TOLAC.Methods: This prospective observational study conducted on 150 pregnant women with one previous LSCS who delivered at Mahatma Gandhi hospital, from January 2017 to July 2018. Patient having a singleton pregnancy, cephalic presentation, adequate pelvis size with spontaneous onset of labor were included. Cases were monitored carefully during the labor. Emergency LSCS was done if any indication appeared.Results: 78% of cases delivered safely by the vaginal birth and 22% of cases had an emergency repeat cesarean section (EmRCS). Favorable Bishop Score, active stage of labor and prior vaginal delivery were associated with higher success rate. One (0.66%) case of uterine scar rupture and 2 (1.33%) cases of scar dehiscence noted. No maternal mortality observed. Perinatal mortality occurred in 2 cases (1.33%).Conclusions: Present study shows that appropriate clinical settings and the properly selected group of patients can make the TOLAC safe and effective.
ABSTRACT
Background: The objective of this study is to evaluate the outcomes of induction of labor in women attempting trial of labor after cesarean delivery and to compare maternal and neonatal morbidity and mortality in women who were induced to those delivering spontaneously.Methods: The prospective study was carried out in the Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology in collaboration with the Neonatal Section, Department of Pediatrics at J.N. Medical College and Hospital, AMU Aligarh. The sample included 280 women with one previous cesarean section, of whom 130 women underwent induction of labor (study group) and 150 were admitted with spontaneous onset of labor. Prostaglandin gel and intracervical Foley’s were used for cervical ripening in the study group. Indication of cesarean section, mode of delivery, maternal and neonatal outcome were studied in between groups.Results: Overall rate of vaginal delivery after cesarean section was 45.3% and 56% in both study and control group respectively. The rate of cesarean section were higher in women who were induced and having unfavorable cervix. Maternal and neonatal morbidity were not significantly higher as compared in both groups, however one case of scar rupture was found in study group.Conclusions: Induction of labor in women with previous cesarean section had higher rates of cesarean section however it does not adversely affect neonatal and maternal morbidity. Overall vaginal birth is safe and effective in women with previous cesarean section by prostaglandin gel or intracervical Foley’s. Authors cautiously suggest, induction of labor should be considered in preselected patient with strict monitoring.
ABSTRACT
Objective To establish a midwife-obstetrician collaboration-based management model for pregnant women after caesarean sections and to evaluate its effectiveness on women′s childbirth outcomes. Methods A panel of experts including obstetricians and midwives was established. A revised management scheme for women after cesarean sections was finally formed through multiple expert consultation method. A historical control method was implemented in our study. Women giving birth before the implementation of collaboration-based management scheme between 2011 and 2013 were recruited in the control group;and women giving birth afterwards between 2014 and 2016 were recruited in the intervention group. Childbirth outcomes such as the mode of delivery, rate of trial of labor after cesarean sections, and vaginal birth rate after cesareans were compared between the two groups. Results A total of 3326 women in intervention group, of those women 281 (8.4%) under trial of labor after cesarean, of the women who under trial of labor 264(94.0%) had successful vaginal birth. A total of 1625 women in control group, of those women 28(1.7%) under trial of labor after cesarean, of the women who under trial of labor 22(78.6%) had successful vaginal birth. The trial of labor after cesarean sections rate and the vaginal birth rate after cesareans rate was significantly higher in intervention group than that in control group (P<0.01). Conclusions The midwife-obstetrician collaboration-based management model can promote vaginal birth for women after cesarean sections, and has no adverse effect on other childbirth outcomes, which is worthy of being implemented more widely in China.
ABSTRACT
Objective To establish a midwife-obstetrician collaboration-based management model for pregnant women after caesarean sections and to evaluate its effectiveness on women′s childbirth outcomes. Methods A panel of experts including obstetricians and midwives was established. A revised management scheme for women after cesarean sections was finally formed through multiple expert consultation method. A historical control method was implemented in our study. Women giving birth before the implementation of collaboration-based management scheme between 2011 and 2013 were recruited in the control group;and women giving birth afterwards between 2014 and 2016 were recruited in the intervention group. Childbirth outcomes such as the mode of delivery, rate of trial of labor after cesarean sections, and vaginal birth rate after cesareans were compared between the two groups. Results A total of 3326 women in intervention group, of those women 281 (8.4%) under trial of labor after cesarean, of the women who under trial of labor 264(94.0%) had successful vaginal birth. A total of 1625 women in control group, of those women 28(1.7%) under trial of labor after cesarean, of the women who under trial of labor 22(78.6%) had successful vaginal birth. The trial of labor after cesarean sections rate and the vaginal birth rate after cesareans rate was significantly higher in intervention group than that in control group (P<0.01). Conclusions The midwife-obstetrician collaboration-based management model can promote vaginal birth for women after cesarean sections, and has no adverse effect on other childbirth outcomes, which is worthy of being implemented more widely in China.