ABSTRACT
Background: Globally, there is an increased trend of cesarean section (CS). Repeat CS is associated with various complications. Successful vaginal birth after caesarean section (VBAC) helps to decrease CS rate and its associated morbidities. Practice of protocol of applying FLAMM score and monitoring by partogram reduces the rate of cesarean section in the previous one lower segment cesarean section patient. Aims and Objectives: The present study is conducted to evaluate the impact of FLAMM scoring for vaginal birth after CS on obstetrics and perinatal outcome in case of the previous one lower segment CS delivery. Materials and Methods: The prospective and observational study was conducted in Obstetrics and Gynaecology department of one of the teaching institutes of Ahmedabad over a period of 1 year. Total 100 pregnant women from labour room with history of the previous one CS, who gave consent for trial of labor after the previous cesarean (TOLAC) were selected and FLAMM score applied on them. Study participants were divided in two groups according to outcome. Group A: Successful TOLAC and Group B: Failed TOLAC. Maternal and neonatal outcome was measured in both groups. Results: Out of 98 patients <40 years, 74.48% had VBAC and 25% had failed TOLAC and two patients were >40 years of age had VBAC. Out of 94 patients with favorable FLAMM’s score, 79% (n = 75) had VBAC and 100% (n = 6) with unfavorable FLAMM had CS. Conclusion: Careful patient selection for TOLAC is of utmost priority to increase success rate and decrease complications. FLAMM scoring system is a very efficient guiding tool for this. By applying FLAMM score, we increase success rate of TOLAC and thereby decrease CS rate in case of previous CS.
ABSTRACT
Objective To establish a midwife-obstetrician collaboration-based management model for pregnant women after caesarean sections and to evaluate its effectiveness on women′s childbirth outcomes. Methods A panel of experts including obstetricians and midwives was established. A revised management scheme for women after cesarean sections was finally formed through multiple expert consultation method. A historical control method was implemented in our study. Women giving birth before the implementation of collaboration-based management scheme between 2011 and 2013 were recruited in the control group;and women giving birth afterwards between 2014 and 2016 were recruited in the intervention group. Childbirth outcomes such as the mode of delivery, rate of trial of labor after cesarean sections, and vaginal birth rate after cesareans were compared between the two groups. Results A total of 3326 women in intervention group, of those women 281 (8.4%) under trial of labor after cesarean, of the women who under trial of labor 264(94.0%) had successful vaginal birth. A total of 1625 women in control group, of those women 28(1.7%) under trial of labor after cesarean, of the women who under trial of labor 22(78.6%) had successful vaginal birth. The trial of labor after cesarean sections rate and the vaginal birth rate after cesareans rate was significantly higher in intervention group than that in control group (P<0.01). Conclusions The midwife-obstetrician collaboration-based management model can promote vaginal birth for women after cesarean sections, and has no adverse effect on other childbirth outcomes, which is worthy of being implemented more widely in China.
ABSTRACT
Objective To establish a midwife-obstetrician collaboration-based management model for pregnant women after caesarean sections and to evaluate its effectiveness on women′s childbirth outcomes. Methods A panel of experts including obstetricians and midwives was established. A revised management scheme for women after cesarean sections was finally formed through multiple expert consultation method. A historical control method was implemented in our study. Women giving birth before the implementation of collaboration-based management scheme between 2011 and 2013 were recruited in the control group;and women giving birth afterwards between 2014 and 2016 were recruited in the intervention group. Childbirth outcomes such as the mode of delivery, rate of trial of labor after cesarean sections, and vaginal birth rate after cesareans were compared between the two groups. Results A total of 3326 women in intervention group, of those women 281 (8.4%) under trial of labor after cesarean, of the women who under trial of labor 264(94.0%) had successful vaginal birth. A total of 1625 women in control group, of those women 28(1.7%) under trial of labor after cesarean, of the women who under trial of labor 22(78.6%) had successful vaginal birth. The trial of labor after cesarean sections rate and the vaginal birth rate after cesareans rate was significantly higher in intervention group than that in control group (P<0.01). Conclusions The midwife-obstetrician collaboration-based management model can promote vaginal birth for women after cesarean sections, and has no adverse effect on other childbirth outcomes, which is worthy of being implemented more widely in China.