ABSTRACT
ABSTRACT Introduction: Intra-articular injection of corticosteroids (IIC) for treatment of patients with juvenile idiopathic arthritis (JIA) is increasingly used in Pediatric Rheumatology. Objectives: To describe the clinical course of patients undergoing IIC in our Pediatric Rheumatology Unit. Methods: Retrospective study of patients with JIA undergoing IIC from January 2008 to December 2012, with a minimum follow-up of six months after the injection. Good response to IIC was set as the presence of inactivity on the infiltrated joint by at least six months. Results: Eighty-eight patients underwent a total of 165 IICs. Of these, 75% were girls and 35.2% had persistent oligoarticular JIA. The mean age at diagnosis was 6.8 years, and when IIC was carried out, 12.2 years. Regarding patients, younger age at diagnosis (p = 0.037) and the occurrence of uveitis in the course of the disease (p = 0.015) were associated with good response to IIC. From 165 IICs, 63% had a good response and joints remained inactive for a median of 18.1 months. The type of joint injection (p = 0.001), lesser values stated in the overall visual analog scale by the physician (p = 0.015) and by parents/patient (p = 0.01) have been associated with a good response to IIC. Nine adverse events (5.4%) were observed. Conclusion: In our study, more than half of the joints showed a good response to IIC. Younger patients at diagnosis and uveitis during the course of the disease had good response to IIC. Knees, wrists and elbows were the joints that best responded to IIC. IIC proved to be a safe procedure.
RESUMO Introdução: A infiltração intra-articular de corticosteroides (IIC) para tratamento de pacientes com artrite idiopática juvenil (AIJ) é cada vez mais usada em reumatologia pediátrica. Objetivos: Descrever a evolução clínica dos pacientes submetidos à IIC em nosso setor de reumatologia pediátrica. Métodos: Estudo retrospectivo de pacientes com AIJ submetidos à IIC de janeiro/2008 a dezembro/2012, com seguimento mínimo de seis meses após a infiltração. Boa resposta à IIC foi definida como inatividade na articulação infiltrada por, no mínimo, seis meses. Resultados: Foram submetidos a 88 pacientes a 165 IICs. Desses, 75% eram meninas e 35,2% apresentavam AIJ oligoarticular persistente. A média de idade ao diagnóstico foi de 6,8 anos e à IIC de 12,2 anos. Em relação aos pacientes, a menor idade ao diagnóstico (p = 0,037) e a ocorrência de uveíte no curso da doença (p = 0,015) foram associados à boa resposta à IIC. Das 165 IICs, 63% apresentaram boa resposta e as articulações permaneceram inativas por um tempo médio de 18,1 meses. O tipo de articulação infiltrada (p = 0,001), menores valores na escala visual analógica global do médico (p = 0,015) e dos pais/paciente (p = 0,01) foram associados a uma boa resposta à IIC. Nove efeitos adversos (5,4%) foram observados. Conclusão: Em nosso estudo, mais da metade das articulações mostrou boa resposta à IIC. Os pacientes com menor idade ao diagnóstico e uveíte durante o curso da doença tiveram boa resposta à IIC. Os joelhos, punhos e cotovelos foram as articulações que mais bem responderam à IIC. A IIC mostrou ser um procedimento seguro.
Subject(s)
Humans , Male , Female , Child , Arthritis, Juvenile/drug therapy , Glucocorticoids/therapeutic use , Injections, Intra-Articular/methods , Retrospective Studies , Treatment Outcome , Glucocorticoids/administration & dosageABSTRACT
Objetivos: Identificar fatores preditivos de resposta à infiltração intra-articular (IIA) com triancinolona hexacetonida (TH). Métodos: Este estudo foi realizado em pacientes de artrite reumatóide (AR) (segundo critérios do American College of Rheumatology) submetidos à IIA (infiltração mono, pauci ou poliarticular). Avaliação: Um observador “cego” avaliou prospectivamente as articulações uma semana (T1), quatro semanas (T4), 12 semanas (T12) e 24 semanas (T24) após IIA. As medidas de desfecho foram Escala Visual Analógica (0-10 cm) em repouso, em movimento e para articulações edemaciadas. As variáveis clínicas e demográficas e aquelas relacionadas à infiltração no início do estudo foram analisadas de acordo com a resposta à IIA. Resultados: Foram estudados 289 pacientes com AR (635 articulações) com média de idade de 48,7 (± 10,68) anos; 48,5% eram caucasianos, EVA para dor global = 6,52 (± 1,73). Na análise univariada, as variáveis relativas às melhores respostas em seguida à IIA (melhora >70%) foram: “IIA no cotovelo e metacarpofalangeanas (MCF)” e “classe funcional II”. Na análise multivariada, “homens” e “não brancos” foram os preditores com melhor resposta à IIA na T4, enquanto “IIA no cotovelo e MCF”, “infiltração poliarticular”, “uso de metotrexato” e “dose total maior de TH” obtiveram a melhor resposta na T24. Conclusão: Foram identificados diversos fatores preditivos de boa resposta à IIA em pacientes com AR. Os preditores de melhor resposta para IIA de TH em longo prazo foram “aplicar IIA no cotovelo e MCF” e “aplicar infiltração poliarticular”. .
Objectives: Identify good response predictors to intra-articular injection (IAI) with triamcinolone hexacetonide (TH). Methods: This study was carried out in rheumatoid arthritis (RA) patients (American College of Rheumatology criteria) submitted to IAI (mono, pauci or polyarticular injection). Assessment: a “blinded” observer prospectively evaluated joints at one week (T1), four weeks (T4), twelve weeks (T12) and 24 weeks (T24) after IAI. Outcome measurements included Visual Analogue Scale (0-10 cm) at rest, in movement and for swollen joints. Clinical, demographic and variables related to injection at baseline were analyzed according to IAI response. Results: We studied 289 patients with RA (635 joints) with a mean age of 48.7 years (±10.68), 48.5% of them Caucasians, VAS for global pain = 6.52 (±1.73). Under univariate analysis, the variables relating the best responses following IAI (improvement > 70%) were: “elbow and metacarpophalangeal (MCP) IAI, and functional class II”. Under multivariate analysis, “males” and “non-whites” were the predictors with the best response to IAI at T4, while “elbow and MCP IAI”, “polyarticular injection”, “use of methotrexate” and “higher total dose of TH” obtained the best response at T24. Conclusion: Several predictors of good response to IAI in patients with RA were identified. The best-response predictors for TH IAI of long term were “inject elbow and MCP IAI” and “perform polyarticular injection”. .
Subject(s)
Humans , Male , Female , Middle Aged , Anti-Inflammatory Agents/administration & dosage , Arthritis, Rheumatoid/drug therapy , Triamcinolone Acetonide/analogs & derivatives , Injections, Intra-Articular , Prognosis , Prospective Studies , Time Factors , Treatment Outcome , Triamcinolone Acetonide/administration & dosageABSTRACT
Excellent responses were obtained from the use of intra-articular injections of triamcinolone hexacetonide in a group of 32 patients with rheumatoid arthritis, degenerative joint disease, ankylosing spondylitis, and gouty arthritis. Side effects are occasional "post-injection flare" and transient dizziness and nausea. It is concluded that this drug offers a distinct advantage in intra-articular therapy of the rheumatic diseases, particularly the rheumatoid arthritis