ABSTRACT
Introducción: Los subependimomas intracraneales son raros, representan el 0.2-0.7% de todos los tumores del sistema nervioso central1,2 y se originan en los ventrículos laterales en el 30-40% de los casos.3 Los síntomas usualmente se asocian a hipertensión endocraneana secundaria a hidrocefalia obstructiva.4 La resección completa del tumor es curativa en esta patología.5 El abordaje trans-surcal es seguro para lesiones ventriculares profundas y el uso de los retractores tubulares minimizan la retracción del parénquima cerebral evitando la compresión directa con valvas. Esto permite disminuir la presión del tejido cerebral que puede ocluir los vasos y producir isquemia local generando una lesión neurológica permanente. Descripción del caso: Se presenta el caso de una paciente de 66 años, diestra, con cefalea crónica que aumenta en frecuencia en el último mes. La resonancia cerebral contrastada muestra un tumor extenso en el ventrículo lateral izquierdo con signos de hidrocefalia obstructiva. Intervención: Se coloca la paciente en posición supina. Se hace una incisión bicoronal y se hace un abordaje trans-surcal F1/F2 izquierdo. Se coloca un retractor tubular guiado con el puntero de neuronavegación, introduciéndolo directamente en el parénquima cerebral y fijándolo al soporte de Leyla. Se colocó un catéter de ventriculostomía contralateral y se retira a las 48 horas sin complicaciones asociadas. La resonancia contrastada postoperatoria demuestra una resección completa del tumor. El análisis de patología reveló un subependimoma grado I de la clasificación de la Organización Mundial de la Salud. La paciente presentó transitoriamente apatía y pérdida del control del esfínter urinario que resolvieron completamente a las 3 semanas después de la cirugía. Se firmó un consentimiento firmado para la publicación de la información utilizada en este trabajo. Conclusión: La resección completa microscópica de un subependimoma extenso del ventrículo lateral izquierdo es factible a través de un abordaje tubular transulcal.
Introduction: Intracranial subependymomas are rare, representing only 0.2-0.7% of all central nervous system tumors1,2 and arise in the lateral ventricles in 30-40% of the cases.3 Symptoms depend on tumor location and usually arise when the cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) is blocked, generating a consequent intracranial hypertension.4 Microsurgical gross-total resection is possible and curative for these tumors.5 The transcortical/trans-sulcal approach is a safe approach for the access of deep-seated intraventricular lesions. The use of tubular retractor systems minimizes retraction injury when passing through the cortex and deep white matter tracts. This allows a decrease in the pressure on brain tissue that can occlude the brain vessels and produce local ischemia and a consequent permanent neurological injury. Case description: This is a case of a 66-year-old woman who presented chronic headaches that increased in frequency in the last month. Enhanced-brain MRI demonstrated a large left ventricular lesion with signs of obstructive hydrocephalus. Procedure: Patient was positioned supine. A bicoronal incision was used to perform a left frontal craniotomy. An F1/F2 transcortical/trans-sulcal approach was used. A guided tubular retractor is placed with the neuronavigation pointer, inserting it directly into the brain parenchyma and fixing it to the Leyla support. Postoperative postcontrast MRI demonstrated a complete resection of the tumor. Histopathological analysis revealed a subependymoma (World Health Organization Grade I). The patient presented transient apathy and loss of urinary sphincter control that completely resolved 3 weeks after surgery. Written informed consent was obtained for publication of information used for this work. Conclusions: A complete microsurgical resection of a large left ventricular subependymoma is feasible through a trans-sulcal tubular approach.
Subject(s)
Ventriculostomy , Brain , Intracranial Hypertension , Lateral Ventricles , Craniotomy , Neuronavigation , NeoplasmsABSTRACT
Introducción: Los quistes artrosinoviales espinales son lesiones infrecuentes que se originan principalmente en la región lumbar. Aunque el tratamiento conservador es posible, la resección quirúrgica es considerada el tratamiento de elección en pacientes sintomáticos. La inestabilidad postoperatoria es una preocupación. Las técnicas mínimamente invasivas (MISS) demostraron ser una alternativa válida que podría disminuir el riesgo de inestabilidad postoperatoria. Objetivo: Describir la importancia de la orientación facetaria en la elección del lado del abordaje (ipsilateral o contralateral) y la conservación de la unión articular en una serie de pacientes operados de quistes sinoviales lumbares por técnica tubular mínimamente invasiva. Material y métodos: Se evaluaron 8 pacientes con quistes sinoviales lumbares operados con técnica tubular mínimamente invasiva. Se analizó en RMN la relación entre la orientación de las facetas articulares y la vía de abordaje seleccionada, se evaluó además la resección de los quistes sinoviales y el grado de preservación facetaria postoperatoria. Información demográfica e intraoperatoria fue detallada. El resultado clínico fue valorado usando la Escala Visual Analógica (VAS) y los criterios de Macnab modificados para medir la satisfacción postoperatoria de los pacientes. El seguimiento mínimo fue de 6 meses. Resultados: Ocho quistes sinoviales fueron operados y resecados completamente. Cinco pacientes presentaron orientación facetaria coronal y 3 sagital los cuales fueron abordados del lado ipsilateral y contralateral respectivamente. En todos los casos se logró preservar al menos 2/3 de la unión facetaria del nivel comprometido. El tiempo promedio de cirugía fue de 110 minutos. Todos los pacientes fueron dados de alta dentro de las 24 hs. Se observó una mejoría de 6 puntos en el VAS. Según la escala de Macnab; 6 pacientes refirieron resultados excelentes, 1 bueno y 1 regular. No se registraron fístulas ni infecciones. Conclusión: La orientación de las facetas articulares definió el lado del abordaje. En facetas articulares con orientación coronal recomendamos el abordaje tubular ipsilateral y en facetas articulares con orientación sagital el abordaje contralateral. Esto permite una excelente exposición del quiste sinovial y la preservación de la articulación facetaria. Ensayos prospectivos con mayor tiempo de seguimiento y cohortes más grandes serían de utilidad para avalar nuestras recomendaciones.
Background: Spinal arthro-synovial cysts are uncommon lesions that largely originate in the lumbar area. Although conservative management is an option, surgical resection is considered the treatment of choice in symptomatic patients. Post-operative instability is of concern, however. Minimally-invasive surgery techniques have proven a valid option which might reduce post-surgical instability. The aim of this paper is to describe the importance of facet orientation in side selection for the surgical approach (ipsilateral or contralateral) and facet joint sparing in a series of patients undergoing minimally-invasive tubular surgery (MITS) for lumbar synovial cysts. Methods: Eight patients with lumbar synovial cysts undergoing MITS were assessed. Pre-operatively, magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) was performed to identify facet joint orientation and aid in surgical approach selection. Post-operatively, MRI was repeated to confirm resection of the synovial cysts and the level of post-surgical facet sparing. Demographic and intraoperative data were recorded, with post- versus pre-operative pain compared using a visual analog scale (VAS), and the modified Macnab criteria used to measure patients' post-operative satisfaction. Minimum post-operative follow-up was six months. Results: Eight synovial cysts were resected completely. Five patients had a coronal and three a sagittal orientation of their facet and were managed with an ipsilateral versus contralateral approach, respectively. In all cases, at least 2/3 of the involved facet joint was spared. Average surgical time was 110 minutes, and all patients were discharged within 24 hours. A mean 6-point improvement was observed in VAS pain severity. Using the Macnab scale, six patients reported excellent results, one a good result and one a fair result. No spinal leaks or infections were reported. Conclusions: Facet-joint orientation determines which side is used for the surgical approach. For facet joints with a coronal orientation, we recommend the ipsilateral tubular approach; while for joint facets with a sagittal orientation, the contralateral approach. This enables both excellent exposure of the synovial cyst and facet-joint sparing. Prospective trials with longer follow-up and larger cohorts are needed to validate our recommendations.
Subject(s)
Synovial Cyst , General Surgery , Lumbosacral RegionABSTRACT
OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to investigate the clinical features and outcomes of pediatric cavernous malformation (CM) in the central nervous system. METHODS: Twenty-nine pediatric patients with supratentorial CM underwent microsurgical excision. In selected cases, transparent tubular retractor system (TTRS) was used to reduce retraction injury and intraoperative neuromonitoring (IONM) was held to preserve functioning cortex. Patients' demographics and symptoms were reviewed and surgical outcomes were discussed. RESULTS: The main initial clinical manifestations included the following : seizures (n=13, 45%), headache (n=7, 24%), focal neurological deficits (n=3, 10%), and an incidental finding (n=6, 21%). Overt hemorrhage was detected in 7 patients (24%). There were 19 children (66%) with a single CM and 10 (34%) children with multiple CMs. In 7 cases with deep-seated CM, we used a TTRS to minimize retraction. In 9 cases which location of CM was at eloquent area, IONM was taken during surgery. There was no major morbidity or mortality after surgery. In the 29 operated children, the overall long-term results were satisfactory : 25 (86%) patients had no signs or symptoms associated with CMs, 3 had controllable seizures, and 1 had mild weakness. CONCLUSION: With the assistance of neuronavigation systems, intraoperative neuromonitoring, and TTRS, CMs could be targeted more accurately and excised more safely. Based on the satisfactory seizure outcome achieved, complete microsurgical excision in children is recommended for CMs presenting with seizures but removal of hemosiderin-stained areas seems to be unnecessary.
Subject(s)
Child , Humans , Central Nervous System , Demography , Headache , Hemangioma, Cavernous, Central Nervous System , Hemorrhage , Incidental Findings , Mortality , Neuronavigation , SeizuresABSTRACT
OBJECTIVE: The objective of this study is to evaluate the efficacy of microdecompression (MD) with microscope and tubular retractor in lumbar foraminal stenosis (FS) and to analyze the clinical outcomes. METHODS: From January 2006 to December 2007, 22 patients with symptomatic lumbar FS underwent conventional decompressive surgery (CDS) and MD was performed in other 20 patients. Clinical outcome was measured using a Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) and Macnab?fs criteria. Spinal instability was determined by radiologic assessment of flexion-extension radiographs. RESULTS: The CDS group included 14 men and 8 women. The MD group included 14 men and 6 women. The mean age was 66.2 years (range, 46-80 yrs) in the CDS group and 65.4 years (range, 59-74 yrs) in the MD group. Average follow-up periods were 18.6 months in the CDS group and 16.5 months in the MD group. Mean operating time was 126 minutes in the CDS group and 168 minutes in the MD group. The mean VAS of back pain decreased from 2.68 to 1.36 in the CDS group and from 2.85 to 1.25 in the MD group. The mean VAS score of leg pain decrea- sed from 6.68 to 1.48 in the CDS group and from 6.65 to 1.40 in the MD group. The success rate of CDS group was 86.3 % (19/22), compared with 85.0% (17/20) for MD group. Radiologically, there was no spinal instability. CONCLUSION:MD could achieve neural decompression and offer an effective treatment of lumbar FS. However it was a technically demanding procedure and effective in limited operative indications. We need to consider long-term follow-up.
Subject(s)
Female , Humans , Male , Back Pain , Constriction, Pathologic , Decompression , Follow-Up Studies , LegABSTRACT
OBJECTIVE: The minimally invasive spine surgery has become popular to reduce approach-related injury associated with the traditional spine surgery. The unilateral laminetomy and bilateral decompression(ULBD) using a microscopic tubular retractor system preserves interpedicular portion of the lamina, the spinous processes, supraspinous and interspinous ligamentous complex, contralateral facet and paraspinal musculature. The aim of this study is to evaluate the effectiveness of ULBD with microscope and tubular retractor system. METHODS: We retrospectively analyzed 24 patients who was diagnosed with lumbar spinal stenosis and treated with ULBD. The visual analogue scale(VAS) and oswestry disability index(ODI) to pain were checked for clinical assessment. We postoperatively observed a presence of spinal instability in flexion-extension radiographs. The cross sectional area (CSA) of dural sac was measured in the preoperative and postoperative magnetic resonance(MR) images. The mean follow up period was 18 months. RESULTS: The subjects were composed of 16 men and 8 women and average age was 67.4 years. Clinical improvement was assessed with VAS and ODI scale at last follow-up. The average VAS score of back pain was decreased from 3.6+/-1.3 to 1.7+/-0.9 after surgery(p<0.01). The average VAS score of leg pain also was decreased from 6.9+/-0.9 to 2.1+/-1.0 after surgery(p<0.01). Average ODI was decreased from 49.0+/-7.3 to 23.2+/-6.2(p<0.01). No patient developed spinal instability after operation on the flexion-extension radiographs. Postoperative CT and MR images showed bila- teral decompression by unilateral laminectomy. The mean dural CSA was significantly increased from 50.8+/-13.5mm2 to 130.5+/-16.5mm2(p<0.01). Complications were detected in two patients(dural tear in one and transient dysesthesia in 1 subject). CONCLUSIONS: ULBD using the microscopic retractor tubular system minimized trauma to posterior lumbar component with favorable clinical outcome. ULBD could be considered to be useful and effective technique for lumbar spinal stenosis.
Subject(s)
Female , Humans , Male , Back Pain , Decompression , Follow-Up Studies , Laminectomy , Leg , Ligaments , Magnetics , Magnets , Paresthesia , Retrospective Studies , Spinal Stenosis , SpineABSTRACT
Posterior lumbar interbody fusion can simultaneously achieve spinal stabilization, anterior-column support, and direct neural decompression via a posterior approach. Unilateral transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (TLIF) has several advantages such as less invasive and less retraction of neural components compared with conventional interbody fusion. But standard posterior spinal fusion with instrumentation requires a moderate amount of paraspinal musculoligamentous dissection. This dissection causes muscle denervation and atrophy that increases risk for failed back syndrome. Therefore, the authors performed a minimally invasive unilateral TLIF with a tubular retractor system combined with pedicle screw fixation to minimize the iatrogenic tissue injury. Although a less invasive unilateral approach was used, the early and longterm outcomes were as good as those on many reported series of posterior interbody fusion. More comfortness during the early postoperative period, small operation scar and less blood loss were the beneficial points compared with other conventional procedures. In the cases of instability of one-motion segment, pedicle screw fixation and TLIF with the tubular retractor system, minimally invasively, can reduce unnecessary trauma to the lumbar supporting structures while still accomplishing sufficient decompression and effective stabilization.
Subject(s)
Atrophy , Cicatrix , Decompression , Muscle Denervation , Postoperative Period , Spinal FusionABSTRACT
Tubular retractor system as a minimally invasive surgery (MIS) technique has many advantages over other conventional MIS techniques. It offers direct visualization of the operative field, anatomical familiarity to spine surgeons, and minimizing tissue trauma. With technical advancement, many spinal pathologies are being treated using this system. Namely, herniated discs, lumbar and cervical stenosis, synovial cysts, lumbar instability, trauma, and even some intraspinal tumors have all been treated through tubular retractor system. Flexible arm and easy change of the tube direction are particularly useful in contralateral spinal decompression from an ipsilateral approach. Careful attention to surgical technique through narrow space will ensure that complications are minimized and will provide improved outcomes. However, understanding detailed anatomies and keeping precise surgical orientation are essential for this technique. Authors present the technical feasibility and initial results of use a tubular retractor system as a minimally invasive technique for variaties of spinal disorders with a review of literature.