ABSTRACT
Objective@#The present study evaluated postoperative reactions in adjacent teeth after the extraction of lower-level horizontal-impacted mandibular third molars using a T-shaped splitting method. @*Methods@#A total of 101 patients with lower-level horizontal impaction of mandibular third molars were selected and randomly divided into two groups. The impacted mandibular third molar was extracted using a T-shaped splitting method in group A （56 cases）, and the traditional two-section method was used in group B （45 cases）。 Postoperative reactions, including temperature sensitivity, percussion pain and mobility in the adjacent teeth, were compared between the 2 groups at 1-week, 2-week, and 1-month follow-up visits. The SPSS 13.0 software package was used for the statistical analysis.@*Results @#The postoperative reactions of temperature sensitivity （χ21w= 11.81, χ22w = 17.43, P < 0.05）, percussion pain （χ21w = 8.70, χ22w = 4.75, P < 0.05） and mobility （χ21w = 4.50, χ22w = 7.10, P < 0.05） in adjacent teeth in group A were significantly less than those in group B at the 1-week and 2-week follow-up visits. The temperature sensitivity in adjacent teeth in group A was significantly less than that in group B at the 1-month follow-up visit （χ2 = 7.10, P < 0.05）, but percussion pain and mobility in adjacent teeth disappeared in both groups. @*Conclusion@#The T-shaped splitting method for the extraction of mandibular lower-level horizontal impacted third molars can reduce the postoperative reactions in adjacent teeth.
ABSTRACT
Objective:To study the feasibility of extraction of impacted mandibular wisdom teeth using turbine drill and new instruments. Methods: 600 patients with impacted mandibular third molars were divides into 2 groups. A group used turbine drill and new instruments to extract the impacted mandibular third molar. B group used the dental chisel to extract the impacted mandibular third molar. The operation time, intraoperative and postoperative complications were recorded to assess the effects of the methods. Results: The operation time of group A and group B was (22.285±12.025 01) min and (16.115±12.078 62) min respectively. The operation time of group A was shorter(P<0.05). The intraoperative and postoperative complication incidence rate was lower(P<0.05). Conclusion: Turbine drill and new instruments method is superior to dental chisel method in the extraction of impacted mandibular wisdom teeth.
ABSTRACT
Objective:To study the feasibility of extraction of impacted mandibular wisdom teeth using turbine drill.Methods:Fifty-one patients with impacted mandibular wisdom teeth on both sides were included.In each patient the two wisdom teeth were randomly divided into test and control groups,the tooth on one side was extracted by means of turbine drill and that on another side by dental chisel method.The operation time,postoperative swell and pain were recorded to assess the effects of the methods.Results:In the extraction of deeply impacted teeth the operation time by turbine drill was shorter(P