ABSTRACT
OBJECTIVE:to provide reference for the continuous improvement of surgical site infection (SSI). METHODS:There were totally 7 472 patients with typeⅠand typeⅡincision surgeries in a hospital after the targeted monitoring and special recti-fication(Jul. 2012 to Jun. 2013,monitoring group)and 5 958 patients with surgeries during the same period before special rectifi-cation(Jul. 2010 to Jun. 2011,control group). The clinic data of typeⅠand typeⅡincision surgical was compared,including infec-tion,the perioperative antibiotics use and hospitalization time after surgery,etc. RESULTS:The infection rate of typeⅠand typeⅡstandardized incision in monitoring group was respectively 0.35% and 0.43% and control group was respectively 0.60% and 1.36%(P<0.05). The rate of typeⅠincision perioperative antibiotics use in monitoring group was 10.72% and control group was 86.88%(P<0.05). The post-operative non-medication rate of patients was increased from the 6.98%(control group)to 49.20%(monitor-ing group)(P<0.05),the discontinuance rate within 48 h was increased from the 32.09%(control group)to 44.11%(monitoring group),and the ratio of patients who took antibiotics after the surgery for more than 3 d was decreased from the 42.82%(control group)to 3.05%(monitoring group)(P<0.05). The inguinal hernia repair time in monitoring group was 3.90 d,shorter than con-trol group(4.22 d)(P=0.018). The patient with gallbladder surgery in monitoring group was 6.47 d,compared with control group (6.38 d),there was no significant difference (P=0.619). CONCLUSIONS:The special rectification can obviously promote the standardized of perioperative antibiotics use,reduce the incidence of SSI and shorten the hospitalization time after operation.
ABSTRACT
Objective:To investigate the rationality of prophylactic antibiotics application during perioperative period in the pa-tients with type Ⅱ incision operation in gynecology and obstetrics in our hospital after the intervention. Methods:Totally 274 medical records of obstetrics and gynecology patients with typeⅡincision operation in our hospital from April 2012 to March 2013 were collect-ed as the control group, another 321 medical records of obstetrics and gynecology patients with typeⅡincision operation in our hospital from April 2013 to March 2014 were collected as the intervention group. The rationality of prophylactic antibiotics application before and after the intervention was compared. Results:Compared with those in the control group, the average administration time, the hos-pitalization time and the cost of antimicrobial agents were significantly decreased in the intervention group (P0. 05). Compared with those in the control group, the incidence of irrational choice of antibacterial drugs, the combined use without indication, irrational medication time,over-time use, inappropriate use and improper choice of solvents in the intervention group was significantly reduced ( P<0. 05). Conclusion:After the intervention, the rationality of prophylactic antibiotics application during perioperative period in the patients with type Ⅱ incision operation in gynecology and obstetrics in our hospital is improved significantly.