Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 1 de 1
Filter
Add filters








Language
Year range
1.
Journal of Korean Academy of Conservative Dentistry ; : 477-482, 2011.
Article in Korean | WPRIM | ID: wpr-122165

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVES: The purpose of this study was to compare the microshear bond strength (uSBS) to enamel prepared with different burs and to determine what type of bur were chosen when a self-etching primer adhesive was used. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Enamel of forty-two human molars were used. They were divided into one of six groups (n = 7), Group 1, coarse (125 - 150 microm) diamond bur; Group 2, standard (106 - 125 microm) diamond bur; Group 3, fine (53 - 63 microm) diamond bur; Group 4, extrafine (20 - 30 microm) diamond bur; Group 5, plain-cut carbide bur (no. 245); Group 6, cross-cut carbide bur (no. 557). Clearfil SE Bond and Clearfil AP-X (Kuraray Medical Inc.) was bonded to enamel surface. The bonded specimens were subjected to uSBS testing. RESULTS: The uSBS of Group 4 was the highest among groups and it was significantly higher than that of Groups 1, 2, 3, and 6 (p < 0.05), but it was not significantly different from that of Group 5. CONCLUSIONS: Different burs used on enamel surface affected the microshear bond strengths of a self-etching primer adhesive to the enamel surface. In the case of Clearfil SE Bond, extrafine diamond and plain-cut carbide bur are recommended for bonding to enamel.


Subject(s)
Humans , Adhesives , Dental Enamel , Diamond , Methacrylates , Molar , Resin Cements
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL