ABSTRACT
Objective To observe the clinical effect of cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) in the treatment of cardiac arrest. Methods A retrospective analysis was coducted, 137 patients with cardiac arrest admitted to Department of Emergency of Fuyang People's Hospital from January 2017 to December 2018 were enrolled, emergency rescue with CPR machine. There were 116 cases of CPR in emergency room, including 44 cases of cardiac arrest before hospital and 72 cases of cardiac arrest in hospital. There were CPR was 21 cases of CPR in EICU. The difference of return of spontaneous circulation (ROSC) rate and rescue time between Emergency Room and Emergency Intensive Care Unit (EICU) and ROSC rate in patients with cardiac arrest before and after emergency rescue room were compared. Results There were 45 cases of ROSC in 137 patients, the success rate of rescue was 32.85%, rescue time was 30.00 (20.00-40.00) minutes, and the maximum duration of times was 180 minutes. The ROSC rate of EICU was significantly higher than that of emergency room [66.67% (14/21) vs. 26.72% (31/116), P < 0.05], and the rescue time was significantly shorter than that of emergency room [minutes: 25.00 (10.00-30.00) vs. 30.00 (25.00-40.00), P < 0.05]. The ROSC rate of patients with cardiac arrest in emergency room was significantly higher than that before hospitalization [33.33% (24/72) vs. 15.91% (7/44), P < 0.05], there was no significant difference in rescue time between patients with cardiac arrest in emergency room and that before hospitalization [minutes: 30.00 (20.00-40.00) vs. 30.00 (26.25-40.00), P > 0.05]. Conclusions The function of CPR provides high quality extrathoracic compression, which effectively saves the labor cost of cardiac compression, especially in the case of shortage of medical and nursing staff. In the face of patients who need continuous CPR for a long time, it is a feasible choice to use CPR machine instead of unarmed CPR, which is worth popularizing in clinic.
ABSTRACT
Objective To compare the clinical effect of unarmed cardiopulmonary resuscitationand cardiopulmonary resuscitationmachine in the emergency room.Methods One hundred cases patients with cardiopulmonary arrest in Hainan Agricultural Reclamation General Hospital from February 2014 to February 2016 were analyzed.The control group(n=50) were given unarmed cardiopulmonary resuscitation,while thetest group(n=50) were given ardiopulmonary resuscitation machine.Two groups' before and after cardiopulmonary resuscitation of arterial blood gas index(oxygen saturation (SaO2),C02 partial pressure (PaC02),oxygen partial pressure(Pa02)),cardiopulmonary resuscitation effectiveness and the success rate,and complications were compared.Results Before cardiopulmonary resuscitation,there were no significant differences on arterial blood gas index (SaO2,PaCO2,PaO2) between the two groups (t =0.069,0.097,0.121,P ＞ 0.05).After cardiopulmonary resuscitation,the SaO2,PaO2 of the test group were higher than that of the control group ((98.60± 8.51) ％ vs.(86.37 ± 7.84) ％,(13.84 ± 1.40) kPa vs.(8.69± 1.21) kPa),while PaCO2 of test group was lower than the control group ((3.24 ± 0.56) kPa vs.(6.41 ± 0.87) kPa),the differences were significant(t =7.474,21.665,19.679,P ＜ 0.05).The cardiopulmonary resuscitation of effective rate,success rate of test group were higher than the control group (84.00％ (42/50) vs.62.00％ (31/50),26.00％ (13/50)vs.10.00％(5/50),x2=6.139,4.336,P＜0.05).The total complication rate of the test group was lower than the control group(8.00％ (4/50) vs.28.00％ (14/50)),the difference was significant (x2 =6.775,P ＜0.05).Conclusion The clinical effect of cardiopulmonary resuscitation machine is significantly superior to unarmed cardiopulmonary resuscitation,which can effectively improve the patient's arterial blood gas state,improve the efficiency and success rate of cardiopulmonary resuscitation,and reduce the complications.