Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 3 de 3
Filter
Add filters








Year range
1.
Braz. j. med. biol. res ; 55: e11542, 2022. graf
Article in English | LILACS-Express | LILACS | ID: biblio-1360234

ABSTRACT

The periaqueductal gray matter (PAG) is an essential structure involved in the elaboration of defensive responses, such as when facing predators and conspecific aggressors. Using a prey vs predator paradigm, we aimed to evaluate the PAG activation pattern evoked by unconditioned and conditioned fear situations. Adult male guinea pigs were confronted either by a Boa constrictor constrictor wild snake or by the aversive experimental context. After the behavioral test, the rodents were euthanized and the brain prepared for immunohistochemistry for Fos protein identification in different PAG columns. Although Fos-protein-labeled neurons were found in different PAG columns after both unconditioned and conditioned fear situations at the caudal level of the PAG, we found greater activation of the lateral column compared to the ventrolateral and dorsomedial columns after predator exposure. Moreover, the lateral column of the PAG showed higher Fos-labeled cells at the caudal level compared to the same area at the rostral level. The present results suggested that there are different activation patterns of PAG columns during unconditioned and conditioned fear in guinea pigs. It is possible to hypothesize that the recruitment of specific PAG columns depended on the nature of the threatening stimulus.

2.
Braz. j. med. biol. res ; 45(4): 349-356, Apr. 2012. ilus
Article in English | LILACS | ID: lil-622750

ABSTRACT

Electrical stimulation of midbrain tectum structures, particularly the dorsal periaqueductal gray (dPAG) and inferior colliculus (IC), produces defensive responses, such as freezing and escape behavior. Freezing also ensues after termination of dPAG stimulation (post-stimulation freezing). These defensive reaction responses are critically mediated by γ-aminobutyric acid and 5-hydroxytryptamine mechanisms in the midbrain tectum. Neurokinins (NKs) also play a role in the mediation of dPAG stimulation-evoked fear, but how NK receptors are involved in the global processing and expression of fear at the level of the midbrain tectum is yet unclear. The present study investigated the role of NK-1 receptors in unconditioned defensive behavior induced by electrical stimulation of the dPAG and IC of male Wistar rats. Spantide (100 pmol/0.2 μL), a selective NK-1 antagonist, injected into these midbrain structures had anti-aversive effects on defensive responses and distress ultrasonic vocalizations induced by stimulation of the dPAG but not of the IC. Moreover, intra-dPAG injections of spantide did not influence post-stimulation freezing or alter exploratory behavior in rats subjected to the elevated plus maze. These results suggest that NK-1 receptors are mainly involved in the mediation of defensive behavior organized in the dPAG. Dorsal periaqueductal gray-evoked post-stimulation freezing was not affected by intra-dPAG injections of spantide, suggesting that NK-1-mediated mechanisms are only involved in the output mechanisms of defensive behavior and not involved in the processing of ascending aversive information from the dPAG.


Subject(s)
Animals , Male , Rats , Anxiety/physiopathology , Escape Reaction/physiology , Fear/physiology , Inferior Colliculi/drug effects , Neurokinin A/pharmacology , Periaqueductal Gray/drug effects , Receptors, Neurokinin-1/antagonists & inhibitors , Substance P/analogs & derivatives , Avoidance Learning , Electric Stimulation , Inferior Colliculi/physiology , Periaqueductal Gray/physiology , Rats, Wistar , Substance P/pharmacology , Vocalization, Animal
3.
Acta investigación psicol. (en línea) ; 1(1): 92-107, abr. 2011. graf
Article in Spanish | LILACS | ID: lil-706772

ABSTRACT

Cuando las ratas tienen acceso a una solución azucarada al 32% y luego la concentración disminuye al 4%, los animales consumen o permanecen en contacto con el bebedero menos tiempo que los animales que siempre consumieron la solución al 4%. A este fenómeno de Contraste Sucesivo Negativo consumatorio (CSNc) se le considera un modelo animal de frustración. Existe evidencia de que en una prueba de luz-oscuridad, las ratas prefieren permanecer en el compartimiento oscuro, lo que sugiere una respuesta de miedo incondicionado hacia lugares claros. Se presentan dos experimentos en los que se evaluó la preferencia de ratas en una prueba de luz-oscuridad y a un CSNc (Experimento 1) y a una Extinción Consumatoria (Ec, acceso a un bebedero vacío, Experimento 2) para evaluar la correlación entre la primera reacción a la devaluación u omisión de reforzadores con las respuestas de miedo incondicionado a los lugares oscuros. Las ratas que permanecieron más tiempo en el lugar oscuro permanecieron menos tiempo en contacto con el bebedero durante el primer ensayo de devaluación del reforzador (Experimento 1) y durante el primer minuto del primer ensayo de Ec (Experimento 2). Esos resultados se discuten en relación con las teorías de Amsel (1958), Gray (1987) y Flaherty (1996).


When rats have access to a 32% sucrose solution and the concentration is decreased to 4%, the animals drink less than those that were always exposed to the 4% solution. This phenomenon is called consummatory Successive Negative Contrast (cSNC) and is considered an animal model of frustration. Existing evidence shows that in a light-dark test, rats prefer to stay in the dark compartment, which suggests an unconditioned fear response to illuminated places. Two experiments were conducted in which the preference of rats in a light-dark test was assessed during a cSNC (Experiment 1) and during a Consummatory Extinction (Ec, access to an empty water tube, Experiment 2) in order to assess the correlation between the first reaction to the devaluation or to the omission of reinforcers with unconditioned fear responses to dark places. Results showed that the rats that spent more time in the dark place spent less time in contact with the water tube during the first reinforcer-devaluation trial (Experiment 1) and during the first minute of the first Ec trial (Experiment 2). The relation of these results and Amsel (1958), Gray (1987), and Flaherty's theories is discussed.

SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL