ABSTRACT
INTRODUÇÃO: Poucos estudos discutem as reações corporais de indivíduos saudáveis no momento em que os exercícios em superfícies instáveis estão sendo executados, embora os efeitos do treinamento efeitos crônicos do exercício- sejam bastante estudados. OBJETIVO: Descrever a cinemática articular do tornozelo e retropé durante essa interação. MÉTODOS: Dezoito voluntários participaram do estudo. A posição articular da região do tornozelo foi estudada em três superfícies: Airex® Balance-pad, BOSU® e chão (controle). Para análise estatística, utilizou-se ANOVA e Pós-teste de Tuckey, considerando um nível de significância menor que 0,05. RESULTADOS: A posição articular da região tornozelo no plano sagital foi diferente no BOSU® em relação ao Airex® (p < 0.001) e ao chão (p < 0.001). O tornozelo ficou em posição mais próxima à neutra no AIREX® e no chão. Com o BOSU, a dorsiflexão foi acentuada. Não houve diferença da posição média no no plano frontal. A variabilidade da posição da região do tornozelo foi maior no BOSU® que no Airex® (p < 0.001) e no chão (p < 0.001), tanto no plano sagital, quanto no plano frontal. A frequência média de deslocamento da posição articular na região do tornozelo no plano sagital foi maior no BOSU® que no chão (p < 0.001); e no plano frontal, para o retropé, foi maior no BOSU® que no Airex® (p < 0.001) e chão (p < 0.001). CONCLUSÃO: Houve diferença no comportamento articular da região do tornozelo na condição BOSU® em relação às demais nas superfícies utilizadas, havendo um aumento das oscilações articulares no processo de controle postural em condições mais instáveis e maior dosiflexão no BOSU®. [AU]
INTRODUCTION: There are few studies approaching the bodily reactions of healthy individuals while performing exercises on unstable surfaces, although the training effects exercise chronic effects - are well studied. OBJECTIVE: The goal of this study is to describe the ankle and rear foot region osteoarticular kinematic during this interaction. METHODS: Eighteen volunteers participated in the study. The ankle region osteoarticular displacement was studied in three different surfaces: AIREX® Balance-pad, BOSU® and Ground (control). Statistical analysis was performed using ANOVA and Tukey test, considering a significance level of 0.05. RESULTS: The position of the ankle joint in the sagittal plane was greater in the BOSU® than in the AIREX® (p < 0.001) and ground (p < 0.001). The ankle was close to the neutral position in the AIREX® and on the ground. With BOSU, the dorsiflexion was accentuated. Considering the frontal plane, there was no difference in the rear foot position. Moreover, the variability in the ankle region position in sagittal and frontal planes was higher in BOSU® than AIREX® (p < 0.001) and ground (p < 0.001). The mean frequency of the ankle position in the sagittal plane was greater in the BOSU® than on the ground (p < 0.001), and, in frontal plane, the rear foot frequency displacement was largest in the BOSU® than in the AIREX® (p < 0.001) and on the ground (p < 0.001). CONCLUSION: There were observed differences in ankle region postural control strategies in the BOSU® condition when compared with the other surfaces tested. The ankle and rear foot oscillations increase and there is a greater dorsiflexion for the postural control under the most unstable condition - BOSU. [AU]
Subject(s)
Ankle , Ankle JointABSTRACT
Objective To explore any changes in surface electromyogram (sEMG) signals from the lumboabdominal muscles during exercise on stable and unstable surfaces. Methods sEMG signals from the lumbo-abdominal muscles of 33 healthy young persons [18 male and 12 female; average age (26.5 ± 4.3 ) years] were measured with the FlexComp Infiniti apparatus.Each subject performed 5 exercises on and off a Swiss ball:sit,bridge,bridge with both knees flexed,reverse bridge as well as press-up. Results ①In bridging there was a significant increase in the activation of the erector spinae during exercise on the ball compared with on the stable surface.②Bridging with both knees flexed gave a significant increase in activations of the erector spinae,the external obliques and the transverses abdominus/internal obliques during exercise on the unstable surface compared with the stable surface.③During reverse bridging there was a significant increase in activation of the erector spinae and rectus abdominus during exercise on the unstable surface compared with the stable surface.④During press-ups there was a significant increase in activation of the rectus abdominus,the external obliques and the transverses abdominus/internal obliques during exercise on the ball compared with the stable surface. Conclusion The unstable surface provides better training stimulus for the activation of the lumbo-abdominal muscles.