Anatomical characteristics and surgical selections of upper lumbar disc herniation / 中国骨伤

<p><b>OBJECTIVE</b>To explore the anatomical characteristics and surgical selections of upper lumbar disc herniation, and evaluate its clinical effects.</p><p><b>METHODS</b>From January 2009 to January 2013, 26 patients with upper lumbar disc herniation were treated in our department. There were 16 males and 10 females, aged from 28 to 51 years old with an average of 45.7 years, 4 cases were in L₁,₂, 9 cases in L₂,₃, and 13 cases in L₃,₄. The data was collected including distance between outer edge of lower facet and the spinous process, the outer edge of the isthmus and spinous process, the lower edge of lamina and the upper edge of the intervertebral space, nerve root arising points and lower edge of the corresponding pedicle. Transforaminal discectomy and interbody fusion combined with pedicle screw fixation was performed in patients with L₁,₂, L₂,₃ herniated disk and 5 patients with L₃,₄ herniated disk complicated with lumbar instability. However another 8 patients with L₃,₄ herniated disk were treated with posterior fenestration decompression. Clinical effects were evaluated by Japanese Orthopaedic Association(JOA). The relative height rate(R) of the intervertebral space was measured preoperatively and 1 year postoperatively. The fusion of the bone graft was also observed.</p><p><b>RESULTS</b>Intraoperative anatomical measurement was taken in all patients. All patients were followed up for more than 1 year with an average of 16 months, and all incisions got healing, JOA was improved from preoperative(10.13±1.49) points to last follow up (25.21±2.13) points with the improvement rate of 79.9%. Among the patients underwent fusion operation, 17 cases obtained bone fusion and 1 case maybe non fusion and no internal fixation failure was found;the R value was (0.231±0.056) mm preoperatively, however (0.345±0.076) mm at 1 year after operation with statistical difference(<0.05). In the patient underwent posterior fenestration decompression, the R value was(0.243±0.036) mm preoperatively, and (0.212±0.046) mm at 1 year after operation without statistical difference (>0.05). No spinal instability and lumbar disc herniation recurrence were found in these patients.</p><p><b>CONCLUSIONS</b>According to the anatomical characteristics of L₁,₂ and L₃,₄ herniated disk, these patients could be treated with transforaminal discectomy and interbody fusion. The anatomical characteristics and clinical manifestations of L₃,₄ herniated disk is similar with the lower lumbar disc herniation, for the patients, an appropriate surgical method should be chosen according to the lumbar stability.</p>

The Comparative Analysis of Clinical Characteristics and Surgical Results between the Upper and Lower Lumbar Disc Herniations

OBJECTIVE: There are differences in the clinical characteristics and surgical results between upper (L1-2 and L2-3) and lower (L3-4, L4-5, and L5-S1) lumbar disc herniations. We conducted this study to compare the clinical features and surgical outcomes between the two types of lumbar disc herniations. METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed the clinical features of patients who underwent microdiscectomies from 2008 to 2012. We evaluated the clinical characteristics such as age, preoperative autonomic dysfunction, the presence or absence of previous lumbar surgery and fusion required during surgery. Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) scores about back pain and leg pain were evaluated preoperatively and at the final follow-up. RESULTS: Upper lumbar group (n=15) was significantly older than lower lumbar group (n=148). The incidence of autonomic dysfunction was significantly higher in upper lumbar group. The number of patients with a previous lumbar surgery was significantly greater in upper lumbar group. There was no statistical significance for fusion required during surgery between two groups. Both groups showed a significant decrease in the VAS scores of leg pain. VAS scores of back pain were significantly decreased in lower lumbar group. But this was not seen in upper lumbar group. Both groups showed significant improvement of Oswestry Disability Index score. CONCLUSION: Upper lumbar group had different clinical characteristics from those of lower lumbar group and these include older age, a higher incidence of autonomic dysfunctions and a higher incidence of patients with previous lumbar surgery. There were no significant differences in surgical outcomes, except for back pain, between two groups.

Herniation of Upper Lumbar Disc: Clinical Finding & Surgical Result

STUDY DESIGN: A retrospective study. OBJECTIVES: We attempted to establish an efficient diagnosis and treatment modality by analyzing clinical manifestations and operative results of upper lumbar disc herniations. SUMMARY OF LITERATURE REVIEW: Upper lumbar disc herniations represented a lower incidence but have become easier to diagnose by predictable clinical aspects and an MRI scan. The operative results have been satisfactory. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We evaluated 41 cases, which were operated with posterior laminectomy and discectomy from September, 1996 to November, 2009. We analyzed pre-operative history, clinical and MRI findings, and then assessed operative results by Kim's criteria and functional change in the follow up. RESULTS: The prevalence of upper lumbar disc herniations in all disc herniations was 8.8%. Pre-operative manifestations were lower back pain (85.4%), radiating pain (80.5%), sensory deficit (53.7%), motor deficit (53.7%), and depressed knee jerk (65.9%). The positive rate of the femoral stretching test (78.0%) was higher than the straight leg raising test (39.0%). The VAS score changed from preoperative 9.0+/-0.8 into postoperative 1.4+/-1.3 points. The operative results were excellent or good in 82.9%. The rate of resuming previous work, including slight modification was 90.2%. CONCLUSIONS: Predictable clinical aspects of the upper lumbar disc herniations are anterior thigh pain with lower back pain, variable motor deficit, sensory deficit, depressed knee jerk and the positive femoral nerve stretching test. Through careful examination and radiological evaluations such as MRI, operative treatment can obtain a symptomatic improvement and satisfactory results.

Cantilever Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion for Upper Lumbar Degenerative Diseases (Minimum 2 Years Follow Up)

PURPOSE: To evaluate the clinical outcomes of cantilever transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (c-TLIF) for upper lumbar diseases. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Seventeen patients (11 males, 6 females; mean +/- SD age: 62 +/- 14 years) who underwent c-TLIF using kidney type spacers between 2002 and 2008 were retrospectively evaluated, at a mean follow-up of 44.1 +/- 12.3 months (2 year minimum). The primary diseases studied were disc herniation, ossification of posterior longitudinal ligament (OPLL), degenerative scoliosis, lumbar spinal canal stenosis, spondylolisthesis, and degeneration of adjacent disc after operation. Fusion areas were L1-L2 (5 patients), L2-L3 (9 patients), L1-L3 (1 patient), and L2-L4 (2 patients). Operation time, blood loss, complications, Japanese Orthopaedic Association (JOA) score for back pain, bone union, sagittal alignment change of fusion level, and degeneration of adjacent disc were evaluated. RESULTS: JOA score improved significantly after surgery, from 12 +/- 2 to 23 +/- 3 points (p < 0.01). We also observed significant improvement in sagittal alignment of the fusion levels, from - 1.0 +/- 7.4 to 5.2 +/- 6.1 degrees (p < 0.01). Bony fusion was obtained in all cases. One patient experienced a subcutaneous infection, which was cured by irrigation. At the final follow-up, three patients showed degenerative changes in adjacent discs, and one showed corrective loss of fusion level. CONCLUSION: c-TLIF is a safe procedure, providing satisfactory results for patients with upper lumbar degenerative diseases.

Clinical Features and Treatments of Upper Lumbar Disc Herniations

OBJECTIVE: Disc herniations at the L1-L2 and L2-L3 levels are different from those at lower levels of the lumbar spine with regard to clinical characteristics and surgical outcome. Spinal canals are narrower than those of lower levels, which may compromise multiple spinal nerve roots or conus medullaris. The aim of this study was to evaluate the clinical features and surgical outcomes of upper lumbar disc herniations. METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed the clinical features of 41 patients who had undergone surgery for single disc herniations at the L1-L2 and L2-3 levels from 1998 to 2007. The affected levels were L1-L2 in 14 patients and L2-L3 in 27 patients. Presenting symptoms and signs, patient characteristics, radiologic findings, operative methods, and surgical outcomes were investigated. RESULTS: The mean age of patients with upper lumbar disc was 55.5 years (ranged 31 to 78). The mean follow-up period was 16.6 months. Most patients complained of back and buttock pain (38 patients, 92%), and radiating pain in areas such as the anterior or anterolateral aspect of the thigh (32 patients, 78%). Weakness of lower extremities was observed in 16 patients (39%) and sensory disturbance was presented in 19 patients (46%). Only 6 patients (14%) had undergone previous lumbar disc surgery. Discectomy was performed using three methods : unilateral laminectomy in 27 cases, bilateral laminectomy in 3 cases, and the transdural approach in 11 cases, which were performed through total laminectomy in 10 cases and unilateral laminectomy in 1 case. With regard to surgical outcomes, preoperative symptoms improved significantly in 33 patients (80.5%), partially in 7 patients (17%), and were aggravated in 1 patient (2.5%). CONCLUSION: Clinical features of disc herniations at the L1-L2 and L2-L3 levels were variable, and localized sensory change or pain was rarely demonstrated. In most cases, the discectomy was performed successfully by conventional posterior laminectomy. On the other hand, in large central broad based disc herniation, when the neural elements are severely compromised, the posterior transdural approach could be an alternative.

Transforminal lumbar interbody fusion technique in treatment of upper lumbar intervertebral disc herniation / 中国矫形外科杂志

[Objective] To investigate the surgical method of transforminal lumbar interbody fusion(TLIF)technique in treatment of upper lumbar intervertebral disc herniation.[Methods]From January 2002 to December 2006,a retrospective analysis on TLIF surgery treatment of 45 patients with upper lumbar intervertebral disc herniation were carried out and they acquired 12~24 months(mean,15 months)follow up.There were 29 males,and 16 females aging from 30~55 years(mean,39.2 years).Eleven intervertebral spaces were T12-L1 hernination,25 intervertebral spaces were L1、2 hernination,and 18 intervertebral spaces were L2、3 hernination of the space.Nine were double disc herniation.All cases were treated with TLIF technique.A retrospective analysis on surgical therapeutic effect was made.[Results]Five patients developed complications after operation and recovered by symptomatic treatment.Patients moved around in 2~3 d after surgery.Oswestry score improved from(52.32 ?9.17)to(20.33 ?5.72)in an average 15-months follow-up.X-ray showed that all cases had bone graft fusion and no adjacent segment degeneration occurred.[Conclusion]TLIF technique is an effective method in treatment of upper lumbar intervertebral disc herniation.It can offer satisfactory clinical effects.

Posterior lumbar interbody fusion in treatment of upper lumbar disc herniation / 中国矫形外科杂志

[Objective]To evaluate the effectiveness of posterior lumbar interbody fusion(PLIF) in the treatment of upper lumbar disc herniation.[Method]Twenty six patients of upper lumbar disc herniation underwent posterior lumbar interbody fusion,lumbago VAS and the pain in waist and lower extremities grades were tested before operation,all patients had an average follow-up period of 20.8 months,then lumbago VAS and the pain in waist and lower extremities grades were tested at last follow-up,lumbago VAS and the pain in waist and lower extremities grades were compared through paired t-test.[Result]All 26 patients had a followed-up.Postoperative VAS had significant lower than preoperative,statistical analysis has remarkable significance(P

L1-2 Disc Herniations: Clinical Characteristics and Surgical Results

OBJECTIVE: Among upper lumbar disc herniations, L1-2 disc herniations are especially rare. We present the specific clinical features of L1-2 disc herniation and compared results of different surgical options. METHODS: The authors undertook a retrospective single institution review of the patients who underwent surgery for L1-2 disc herniation. Thirty patients who underwent surgery for isolated L1-2 disc herniations were included. RESULTS: Buttock pain was more frequent than anterior or anterolateral thigh pain. Standing and/ or walking intolerance was more common than sitting intolerance. The straight leg raising test was positive only in 15 patients (50%). Iliopsoas weakness was more frequent than quadriceps weakness. Percutaneous discectomy group demonstrated worse outcome than laminectomy group or lateral retroperitoneal approach group. CONCLUSION: Standing and/or walking intolerance, positive femoral nerve stretch test, and iliopsoas weakness can be useful clues to the diagnosis of L1-2 disc herniation. Posterior approach using partial laminectomy and medial facetectomy or minimally invasive lateral retroperitoneal approach seems like a better surgical option for L1-2 disc herniation than percutaneous endoscopic discectomy.

Simultaneous Paraspinal and Midline Approach for Upper Lumbar Disc Herniation: Technique to Prevent Lamina Fracture

OBJECTIVE: Upper lumbar disc herniation is rare disease, compared with lower. The lamina of this high level lumbar vertebra is narrower than that of low level, and this have taken surgeon into important consideration for surgical methods because partial removal of lamina for discectomy weakens the base of the articular process and may result in fracture. The authors an accurate preoperative diagnosis that enables the surgeon to operative approach for preserving the facet joint. METHODS: Thirteen patients with upper lumbar disc herniation have underone surgical procedure by midline approach for removal of ruptured disc fragment and paraspinal approach for removal of residual disc materials simultaneously without instrumentation. All patients who underwent surgery were analyzed and long-term follow-up was conducted. RESULTS: At a mean follow-up of 24months, there were complete resolution of presenting radiating leg pain in 85% of the patients, 7.5% were left with minimal residual discomfort, and 7.5% derived little or no benefit from surgery. The follow-up radiologic findings of all patients shows that lamina and facet joint have preserved safely and no instability. CONCLUSION: Simultaneously, paraspinal with midline approach provides highly satisfactory operating methods by simplifying exposure and greatly limiting the risk of complications. This provides the basis for a planned surgical approach in which destruction of the facet joint can be avoided.

Multi-access for the Diagnosis of Missed Upper Lumbar Disc Herniation

Herein, a case of missed upper lumbar disc herniation, diagnosed by thorough neurological examination, digital infrared thermographic imaging(DITI), and repeated magnetic resonance(MR) image study, is reported. A 36-year-old female presented with intractable leg pain on left anterior thigh. Although she underwent lumbar MR image at other hospital, she was misdiagnosed as acute sprain. Neurological examination suggested the possibility of upper lumbar disc herniation, which was confirmed by DITI, MRI, and selective root block. After operation, her leg pain was significantly improved. It should be considered that upper lumbar disc herniation might be misdiagnosed as an acute sprain, as in our case. A high index of suspicion based on thorough neurological examination is most important in such cases. Then, multi-access such as DITI, MR image, and selective block, base on thorough neurological examination, are warranted.

Anterloateral Approach Combined with Modified Posterolateral Approach for a Lesion of the Thoracic or Upper Lumbar Region

During recent 3 years, 10 patients with epidural cord compression from a lesion in the anterior portion of the thoracic or upper lumbar area have been treated surgically by an anterolateral approach combined with modified posterolateral approach for decompression. Of 10 patient-two cases of OPLL(ossification of posterior longitudinal ligament) with herniated disc, two cases of metastatic tumor, one case of neurilemmoma, one case of pyogenic osteomyelitis of the vertebral body, two cases of herniated disc, one case of traumatic fracture-dislocation, and one case of congenital hemivertebra-5 patients with mild paraparesis improved postoperatively and returned to normal neurologically, 4 patients with moderate gait disturbance were ambulatory without any device, and one completely paraplegic patient was able to walk with device at 1 year after the operation. This approach could be used for removal of disc material, transverse process, lamina, or pedicle through one stage operation. This point is an advantage of this method compared to postero-lateral approach, lateral approach, or anterolateral approach. Anterior decompression by a modified anterolateral approach should be considered for management of spinal cord compressions such as tumor, infective lesion, traumatic lesion, or congenital malformation.