Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 2 de 2
Filter
Add filters








Year range
1.
Article in English | IMSEAR | ID: sea-165688

ABSTRACT

A 24 year old male presented with acute pain in left loin with burning micturition, investigation revealed minimal functioning of left kidney with left hydronephrosis and hydroureter and a giant ureteric calculus. He underwent open ureterolithotomy. A giant ureteric calculus measuring 10.5 cm and weighing 49 gm was retrieved from the left ureter post-operative recovery was eventful and was discharged after 10 days.

2.
Korean Journal of Urology ; : 1034-1038, 1993.
Article in Korean | WPRIM | ID: wpr-116698

ABSTRACT

The current practice for the management of upper ureteral stones is to push the stone back into the renal pelvis before extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy. But recent treatment modality for urinary stone is required to be less invasive and morbid. We evaluated 194 patients with upper ureter stones for the effectiveness or push-back. When in situ treatment was performed in 122 patients, the stone free rate at 3 months was 83.6% and the storage for complete fragmentation was 153.5. Push back was tried in 72 patients randomly. Out of them, 13 cases(18.6 %) were manupulated into the renal pelvis successfully and operation was required in 2 cases due to ureteral perforation. The stone free rate was 79.6% and storage for complete fragmentation was 153.7 in push back success group. There was no significant difference between two groups. We think that the primary treatment of choice for upper urinary stone is in situ ESWL. The treatment modality of push back is secondary choice in the case that was railed by primary in situ ESWL.


Subject(s)
Humans , Kidney Pelvis , Kidney , Lithotripsy , Shock , Ureter , Urinary Calculi
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL