ABSTRACT
Background: Modern obstetrics has a tremendous issue in inducing full-term labor in women with a viable fetus. When the hazards of prolonging pregnancy outweigh the advantages of birth, induction is undertaken. This study’s objective was to evaluate the efficacy of misoprostol 50µg administered sublingually, orally and vaginally in the process of inducing labor.Material & Methods:Between June 2021 and July 2022, 120 pregnant women admitted in Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, ShaheedZiaur Rahman Medical College and Hospital, Bogura in Bangladesh were recruited randomly for a randomized control trial as per inclusion criteria. Misoprostol was administered either orally or sublingually to each patient. A maximum of three doses might be administered if necessary. A previous cesarean birth was an exclusion criterion. The number of women who had a vaginal birth during 24 hours of induction was our major metric for success. SPSS 26 was used to analyze the data.Results:The induction to delivery intervals were considerably shorter in the sublingual group (18 hours versus 25.5 hours; mean difference was 6.2 hours; 95 percent confidence interval, 1.5 to 14.6). In the sublingual group, there was just 2% occurrence of uterine hyperstimulation. The two groups did not vary significantly in terms of delivery method, fetal distress, or newborn outcomes. A total of 80% percent and 82.60 percent of patients were satisfied with the oral and sublingual groups, respectively, and only 10% percent believed the sublingual tablets didn’t entirely dissolve.Conclusion:Sublingual misoprostol seems to be a successful method of delivery, although further clinical studies are needed to demonstrate the safety and effectiveness of the sublingual mode.
ABSTRACT
Background:Labour progress in partograph plotting helps to early recognition and prevention of the complication of labour. This helpful in better maternal and perinatal outcome. Aim of the study is to evaluate the maternal and perinatal outcome in primigravida and multigravida by comparing their partograph in labour.Material And Methods:This prospective observational study was carried out in Smt. SCL General Hospital a teaching tertiary care hospital from May-2018 to November-2019. Total 250 cases out of which 125 cases of primigravida and 125 cases of multigravida admitted in labour room were randomly selected and monitored by using modified WHO partograph. All the cases reporting to labour room and fulfilled the inclusion criteria were included in thisstudy. Individual partograph was studied to know the various aspect of course of labour.Result:208 out of 250 cases were before alert line, 34 cases were between alert and action line and 8 cases were beyond action line. Rate of cervical dilatation in most primigravida was between 1.1-2cm/hour and in multigravida was >2.1cm/hour. In Zone A, in primigravida 90.7% had VD and 9.3% had LSCS whereas in multigravida 96.4% had VD and 3.6% had LSCS. In Zone B, in primigravida 47.8% had vaginal delivery and 52.2% had LSCS whereas in multigravida 54.4% had VD and 45.5% LSCS. In Zone C, in primigravida and multigravida there were no VD and 100% had LSCS. Protracted active phase (50%) was presents the most common abnormality of first stage of labour in both group inpresent study and in second stage, arrest of decent (82%) was more common. In both groups, NICU admission were more in Zone C (3.2%) as c ompared to Zone A (2%) and Zone B (1.6%).Conclusion:This study has shown that using the partograph can be highly effective in reducing complications from both mother and neonate. It is also helpful in monitoring of labour and early diagnosis of abnormal labour. It prevents maternal mortality and morbidity.