ABSTRACT
Objective To investigate the distribution and drug resistance ofEnterococcus faecium,provide evidence for clinical rational use of antimicrobial agents.Methods Retrospective analysis of drug resistance of Enterococcus faecium,summarize the specimen type,distribution of departments and so on,to explore the trend of drug resistance.Results Enterococcus faecium to vancomycin resistance rate from 3.54％ (4/113) in 2010,rose to 8.45％ (18/213) in 2013.One strains of hnezolid resistant Enterococcus faecium 717 was found,the minimum inhibitory concentration of 7.9 mg/L,not tigecycline resistance in Enterococcus faecium found.Conclusion Vancomycin resistant Enterococcus faecium for linezolid and tigecycline susceptibility is still high,the two kinds of antimicrobial agents can be used for the treatment of vancomycin resistant Enterococcus faecium.
ABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Nosocomial infections caused by vancomycin-resistant enterococci (VRE) are increasing problem in Korea. Until now, no nationwide study has been performed. The aim of the present study was to monitor the antimicrobial resistance of vancomycin-resistant Enterococcus faecium (VREF). METHODS: Two hundred and two E. faecium isolated in 10 teaching hospital were studied. To detect VRE, the brain heart infusion agar containing 6 /mL vancomycin was used as the screening agar. The MIC was determined using agar dilution test. The vancomycin resistance genes (vanA, vanB & vanD) and genes (aac(6 ') Ie-aph(2 ") Ia & ant(6 ') Ia encoding the aminoglycoside-modifying enzymes were detected by multiplex PCR using specific primers. RESULTS: Thirty-nine VREF were detected from 202 isolates. All had vancomycin MICs > or =256 /mL and harboured vanA gene. No isolates revealed positive results for the vanB or vanD gene. However, the MIC range for teicoplanin was 2 to > or =256 /mL. All isolates with gentamicin MIC > or = 500 /mL gave positive results for the aac(6 ') Ie aph(2 ") Ia genes and with streptomycin > or =2000 /mL gave positive results for the ant(6 ') Ia gene. CONCLUSIONS: All VREF harboured vanA gene. According to MIC tests, 7 isolates(18%) showed intermediate or susceptible to teicoplanin. Therefore we need a study concerning the clinical meaning. The VREF in Korea contain at least one of genes encoding the aminoglycoside-modifying enzymes. This means there are only limited numbers of antibiotics to choose.
Subject(s)
Agar , Anti-Bacterial Agents , Brain , Cross Infection , Enterococcus faecium , Enterococcus , Gentamicins , Heart , Hospitals, Teaching , Korea , Mass Screening , Multiplex Polymerase Chain Reaction , Streptomycin , Teicoplanin , Vancomycin , Vancomycin ResistanceABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Recently, an acquired resistance to vancomycin in enterococci has become a serious clinical problem. For the prevention of further propagation of vancomycin-resistant enterococci (VRE), epidemiological study of the infection is essential, but studies on the VRE infection are rare in Korea. We conducted an analysis of the epidemiology of a VRE outbreak in a neonatal intensive care unit (NICU) to clear up the route of propagation of the VRE. METHODS: Vancomycin-resistant Enterococcus faecium (VREFM) strains were isolated from urine specimens of seven patients, rectal swabs from seven patients, and three skin swabs from two patients in the Kosin Medical Center neonatal intensive care unit, Pusan, Korea. Antimicrobial susceptibilities were tested by a disk diffusion method and agar dilution method. Genotypes of vancomycin-resistance were determined by PCR and SmaI-digested genomic enterococcal DNAs were analyzed by pulsed-field gel electrophoresis. RESULTS: All of the 17 strains of VREFM were resistant to ampicillin, vancomycin, and teicoplanin and they showed the same genotype (vanA). SmaI-digested genomic DNAs of seven strains isolated from urine were typed as I (1), II (1), IIIb (4), and IV (1). Three strains from skin swabs were I (2) and II (1). Six strains from rectal swabs were I (2), II (1), and IIIa (3). Genomic DNA typing of one isolate from a rectal swab failed. Each genomic DNA type of VREFM strains isolated from skin swabs of two patients were the same with those from urine specimens as I and II, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: This study suggests that VRE strains colonized in the intestines can cause infections after skin colonizing and can be transmitted/propagated to other people through skin contact. In conclusion, it is important for the prevention of the dissemination of VRE that controls for patients' skin hygiene, as well as hand washing by medical persons, be put in place.