Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 4 de 4
Filter
Add filters








Year range
1.
Ghana Med. J. (Online) ; 57(2): 97-101, 2023. tables
Article in English | AIM | ID: biblio-1436154

ABSTRACT

Objective: This study aimed to determine the duration of SARS-CoV-2 clearance in persons in Ghana. The research question was whether the duration of virus clearance in Ghana matched the 14 days recommended by the World Health Organization (WHO); this had direct implications for transmission, which was key in managing the COVID-19 pandemic. Design: This was a retrospective analytical study. Setting: All facilities that submitted clinical specimens to Noguchi Memorial Institute for Medical Research (NMIMR) for SARS-CoV-2 diagnosis between March to June 2020 were included in the study. Interventions: Samples from 480 persons who tested positive for SARS-CoV-2 by RT-PCR from March to June 2020 at NMIMR and submitted at least two follow-up samples were retrospectively analysed. Individuals with two consecutive negative RT-PCR retesting results were considered to have cleared SARS-CoV-2. Results: The median time from the initial positive test to virus clearance was 20 days (IQR: 5-56 days). This was six days longer than the WHO-recommended 14 days, after which infected persons could be de-isolated. Sputum and nasopharyngeal swabs proved more sensitive for detecting viral RNA as the infection progressed. At a significance level of 0.05, age and sex did not seem to influence the time to SARS-CoV-2 clearance. Conclusions: The median time to SARS-CoV-2 clearance in this study was 20 days, suggesting that SARS-CoV-2 infected persons in Ghana take longer to clear the virus. This finding calls for further investigations into whether patients who remain PCR positive continue to be infectious and inform isolation practices in Ghana.


Subject(s)
Humans , Male , Female , Signs and Symptoms , Middle East Respiratory Syndrome Coronavirus , SARS-CoV-2 , COVID-19 , COVID-19 Nucleic Acid Testing
2.
Article | IMSEAR | ID: sea-212392

ABSTRACT

Background: In view of recent publications of conflicting evidence on the safety and efficacy of hydroxychloroquine as prophylaxis and as a treatment for COVID-19 patients, we need to assess the effect of hydroxychloroquine in COVID-19 patients of authors own local population.Methods: In this retrospective chart review study, categorization of confirmed COVID-19 cases nasopharyngeal swab of RT-PCR was done into a group of patients who received hydroxychloroquine standard dose and another control group who did not receive hydroxychloroquine. The main comparing parameter was to see virus clearance days across both groups.Results: A total of 112 patients were included for the study, and grouped of 72 patient who received HCQS and remaining 40 patients as control. The virus clearance time in days was found to be 9.01±3.08 for HCQS group and for control group it was 8.64±2.34 days (Man Whitney U test value = 2.13, p=0.756).Conclusions: There is no significant difference found in attaining virus negative status with use of HCQS administration in this study.

3.
Chinese Journal of Clinical Infectious Diseases ; (6): E009-E009, 2020.
Article in Chinese | WPRIM | ID: wpr-811496

ABSTRACT

Objective@#To study the effect of low-to-moderate dose glucocorticoid therapy on viral clearance time in patients with COVID-19.@*Methods@#A total of 72 patients diagnosed with COVID-19 from January 19 to February 17, 2020 at the First Affiliated Hospital, School of Medicine, Zhejiang University were recruited. All patients received oral abidol and/or combined lopinavir/ritonavir, darunavir antiviral, and symptomatic supportive care. Among them, 51 patients received methylprednisolone (0.75-1.50 mg·kg-1·d-1) (glucocorticoid treatment group), and 21 patients who did not use glucocorticoid were the control group. The time of stable virologic conversion insputumand the time of radiologic recovery in lungsince onset were compared between the two groups and among the normal patients.The Kruskal-Wallis test or Fisher exact test was used to compare the difference between groups.@*Results@#The median ages of the glucocorticoid group and the control group were 52 [interquartile range (IQR):45, 62] years and 46 (IQR: 32, 56)years, and the differences were significant (P<0.05). The clinical conditions at hospital admission were different between the two groups (P<0.01). There were 52.0% critical ill patients in the glucocorticoid treatment group, compared to that of 71.4% normal patients in the control group. The median times from the onset tostable virologic conversion to negative in the two groups were 15 (IQR:13,20) days and 14 (IQR:12,20) days (P>0.05), and the difference was no statistically significant. The median times from onset to radiologic recovery were 13 (IQR: 11,15) days and 13 (IQR:12,17) days in the two groups, and there was no difference (P>0.05). In ordinary patients, the median timesfrom the onset tostable virologic conversion insputum were no difference (P>0.05), with 13 (IQR:11,18) days in the glucocorticoid group and 13 (IQR:12,15) days in the control group; The median times from onset to radiologic recovery in lungwere also no difference (P>0.05), with 12 (IQR: 10,15)days in the glucocorticoid group and 13 (IQR: 12,17) days inthe control group.@*Conclusions@#Low-to-moderate glucocorticoid treatment has no effect on the time of virus clearance in patients with different clinical types of COVID-19. The glucocorticoid is not recommended since no effectiveness on accelerating the improvement of radiologic recovery in lung has been observed.

4.
Chinese Journal of Immunology ; (12)1985.
Article in Chinese | WPRIM | ID: wpr-674975

ABSTRACT

Objective:To gain insight into the mechanism responsible for clearance of natural hepa DNA virus infections.Methods:A group of seven 2~3 month old ducks were infected intravenously with 10~20 ml DHBV positive serum containing 5?10 7 genomes/ml.Following inoculation,ducks were bled at weekly intervals to obtain serum samples for analysis of DHBV DNA and DHBsAg and anti DHBV antibodies.Peripheral blood mononuclear cells were collected at 10,35 days postinoculation(p.i) and used to conduct antigen specific blastogenesis assay.Liver samples were obtained at 5,30,60 days p.i for analysis of DHBV DNA and surface antigens and liver histology.Results:Infection of all 7 animals with approximately 5?10 8~1?10 9 DHBV genomes led to a transient viremia after an incubation period of 1 to 2 weeks.Liver samples contained multiple copies of all of the expected species of DHBV DNA replicative intermediates,including DHBV cccDNA during the peak of viremic phase.Further analysis showed that the absence of a prolonged viremia could be explained by immediate antigen specific blastogenesis and high titer of antibody response.Meanwhile,there was no obvious evidence of liver cell injury during transient DHBV infection.Conclusion:These results demonstrate that noncytopathic antiviral mechanisms make a role in hepa DNA virus clearance.

SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL