ABSTRACT
RESUMO Objetivo Realizar a adaptação transcultural do Instrumento Profiles of Early Expressive Phonological Skills- Brazilian Portuguese (PEEPS-BP) - Lista expandida, realizando a validação de conteúdo. Método Estudo de adaptação transcultural, quantitativo e transversal, considerando critérios psicométricos. Realizou-se o estudo da lista de 423 palavras do Inventário de Desenvolvimento Comunicativo- MacArthur- Palavras e Sentenças, adaptado para o Português Brasileiro. O método foi dividido em quatro Etapas. A lista foi julgada por juízes especialistas (JE) e juízes não especialistas (JNE), considerando como critério a familiaridade da palavra para uma criança entre 24 e 36 meses, e a representatividade da palavra com brinquedo/objeto, contemplando as Etapas 1 e 2. Os juízes crianças analisaram, em situação de coleta de dados, a familiaridade e a representatividade das palavras-estímulos, apresentado na Etapa 3. Após, realizou-se o estudo piloto- Etapa 4, com as palavras-estímulo selecionadas. Na análise estatística dos juízes especialistas e não especialistas utilizou-se o índice de Concordância do Kappa Fleiss e Gwet. Na análise das respostas dos juízes crianças e no estudo piloto, a análise foi feita em relação ao tipo de resposta da criança, especificamente pontuando a nomeação espontânea do brinquedo/objeto, pontuando de forma qualitativa. Resultados O resultado da Etapa 1 e 2, e a concordância dos testes estatísticos para os critérios de Familiaridade e Representatividade foi de 45,7% para JE e 76,4% para JNE, e resultado de 100% para a concordância da Representatividade. Foram analisadas 122 palavras, resultantes dos critérios previamente estabelecidos, totalizando 34 palavras (exclusão de uma palavra por parte das pesquisadoras), totalizando 33 palavras-estímulos. Na Etapa 3, das 33 palavras-estímulos aplicadas, nove apresentaram pontuação de nomeação espontânea abaixo do esperado, sendo retestadas para a Etapa 4, Estudo Piloto. O resultado do Estudo Piloto evidenciou que das nove palavras-estímulos retestadas, quatro delas ainda apresentaram pontuação abaixo, sendo excluídas do estudo. Portanto com a aplicação do estudo piloto a lista expandida do PEEPS-BP, resultou em 29 palavras. Conclusão O PEEPS-BP - Lista Expandida apresentou evidências de validade de conteúdo satisfatórias para a adaptação transcultural do teste.
ABSTRACT Purpose To carry out the cross-cultural adaptation of the Instrument Profiles of Early Expressive Phonological Skills- Brazilian Portuguese (PEEPS-BP) - Expanded list, performing content validation. Methods Cross-cultural, quantitative and cross- sectional adaptation study, considering psychometric criteria. A study was carried out on the list of 423 words from the Communicative Development Inventory - MacArthur - Words and Sentences, adapted to Brazilian Portuguese. The method was divided into four steps. The list was judged by expert judges (JE) and non-specialist judges (JNE), considering as a criterion the familiarity of the word for a child aged between 24 and 36 months, and the representativeness of the word with toy/object, contemplating Steps 1 and 2. The child judges analyzed, in a data collection situation, the familiarity and representativeness of the stimulus-words, presented in Step 3. Afterwards, the pilot study - Step 4, was carried out with the selected stimulus-words. In the statistical analysis by expert and non-specialist judges, the Fleiss' Kappa and Gwet Concordance index was used. In the analysis of the responses of the child judges and in the Pilot Study, the analysis was made in relation to the type of response of the child, specifically scoring the spontaneous naming of the toy/object, scoring qualitatively. Results The result of Steps 1 and 2, and the agreement of the statistical tests for the Familiarity and Representativeness criteria was 45.7% for JE and 76.4% for JNE, and a result of 100% for the agreement of Representativeness. A total of 122 words were analyzed, resulting from previously established criteria, totaling 34 words (exclusion of one word by the researchers), totaling 33 stimulus-words. In Stage 3, of the 33 stimulus-words applied, nine presented spontaneous naming scores below expectations, being retested for Step 4, the Pilot Study. The result of the Pilot Study showed that of the nine retested stimulus-words, four of them still had a score below, being excluded from the study. Therefore, with the application of the Pilot Study, the expanded list of PEEPS-BP resulted in 29 words. Conclusion The PEEPS-BP - Expanded List showed satisfactory evidence of content validity for the cross-cultural adaptation of the test.
ABSTRACT
RESUMO Objetivo construir um instrumento de triagem do vocabulário para crianças entre 3 e 7 anos de idade. Métodos a etapa 1, de construção do instrumento, consistiu em revisão da literatura nacional e internacional, para verificar os instrumentos utilizados para triagem do vocabulário, por meio de pesquisa nas bases de dados SciELO, LILACS, ERIC e PubMed. Na etapa 2, denominada formulação de itens e manual de uso, foi elaborado um instrumento direcionado para o vocabulário, com a criação de um banco de dados de palavras para crianças de 3 a 7 anos, de acordo com 11 categorias semânticas, em habilidades expressivas e receptivas. Por fim, a etapa 3 consistiu na criação das fichas de aplicação do instrumento. Resultados na primeira etapa do estudo, foram identificados três instrumentos internacionais para triagem do vocabulário. Nenhum instrumento nacional foi encontrado. Quanto à segunda etapa, o banco de dados consistiu em um total de 210 palavras, dentre elas, substantivos, adjetivos e verbos. Na terceira etapa, foram criadas as imagens, manual e folhas de resposta. Conclusão verificou-se escassez de instrumentos de triagem do vocabulário na literatura internacional e nacional. Portanto, foi construído um instrumento de triagem do vocabulário infantil para crianças entre 3 e 7 anos de idade.
ABSTRACT Purpose To develop a vocabulary screening tool for children from 3 to 7 years of age. Methods Step one, development of the instrument, consisted of an integrative review of the National and International literature to verify instruments for vocabulary screening, and used the SciELO, LILACS, ERIC and PubMed databases. For step two, the items and user's manual were developed. A vocabulary-oriented instrument was developed: a database of words for children from 3 to 7 years old comprised 11 semantic categories and tapped expressive as well as receptive skills. The final step involved the creation of protocols for the instrument. Results In the first step of the study, three international vocabulary screening instruments were identified. No national instrument was found. For the second step, a set of a total of 210 words were selected, including nouns, adjectives and verbs. During the third and final step, images, manual and answer protocols were developed. Conclusion There was a scarcity of vocabulary screening instruments identified in international and national literature. Therefore, a vocabulary screening instrument for children between 3 and 7 years of age was developed.
Subject(s)
Humans , Child, Preschool , Child , Triage/methods , Language Development Disorders/diagnosis , Language Tests , Mass Screening , Early DiagnosisABSTRACT
OBJECTIVES: The objective of this study was to compare the long-term auditory performance and language skill depending on the age of cochlear implantation in the Korean population. We especially tried to separate the effect of maturation/development from that of the age at implantation. METHODS: Eighty-six pre-lingual children with profound hearing loss who underwent a cochlear implantation before the age of six and had been followed for more than 3 yr were included in this study prospectively. Categories of Auditory Performance (CAP) and Korean Picture Vocabulary Test (K-PVT) were serially followed up. In order to separate the age at implantation effect, K-PVT results were readjusted to the child's chronological age in the normal hearing population. RESULTS: When the CAP and K-PVT scores were directly compared without chronological readjustment, we failed to show a significant difference for improvements according to the age at implantation. Early cochlear implantation was associated with better language development, only when the K-PVT scores were readjusted to percentile scores of their chronological age. CONCLUSION: Early cochlear implantation was associated with better language development even within the critical period. This advantage may be recognized only when the effect of the age at implantation is separated from the effect of maturation/development.