ABSTRACT
Resumen Por ser el Perú un país endémico de HTLV-1, es importante conocer la confiabilidad de las marcas comerciales para el diagnóstico más usadas en nuestro país. En el presente estudio, evaluamos dos marcas comerciales de pruebas de ELISA (Biokit y Wantai) para la detección de anticuerpos contra HTLV-1 frente a muestras peruanas. Ambas marcas comerciales fueron evaluadas frente a 242 sueros: 123 positivos a HTLV-1 y 119 negativos a HTLV-1 (referencia: inmunoblot). Se estimaron los parámetros de precisión diagnóstica. La sensibilidad, especificidad, VPP, VPN e índice de validez de Biokit fueron: 100%, 93,2%, 93,8%, 100%, 96,6%; respectivamente y de Wantai fue de 99,1% para todos los parámetros. Concluimos, que la marca Biokit fue la más adecuada para ser usada en el Laboratorio de Referencia Nacional de Virus de Transmisión Sexual, VIH/SIDA de Perú.
Abstract As Peru is endemic to HTLV-1, it is important to know the reliability of the most used screening trademarks in our country. In the present study, we evaluated two brands of ELISA (Biokit and Wantai) for the detection of antibodies against HTLV-1/2 against Peruvian samples. Both brands were evaluated against 242 sera: 123 positive for HTLV-1 and 119 negative for HTLV-1 (Reference: Immunoblot). We estimated diagnostic accuracy parameters. The sensitivity, specificity, PPV, NPV and validity index of Biokit were: 100%, 93.2%, 93.8%, 100%, 96.6%; respectively and Wantai were 99.1% for all parameters. We conclude that the Biokit brand is the most suitable for use in the National Reference Laboratory of Sexually Transmitted Viruses HIV/AIDS, Peru.
Subject(s)
Humans , Human T-lymphotropic virus 1 , HTLV-I Infections , Acquired Immunodeficiency Syndrome , Peru , Enzyme-Linked Immunosorbent Assay , HTLV-I Infections/diagnosis , Reproducibility of ResultsABSTRACT
Abstract: Background. There are only few reports about travel-associated, imported tropical hepatitis E virus (HEV) genotype 1 infections within Western travellers. We describe the clinical course of a single outbreak of hepatitis E in a German travellers group returning from India and compare the results of two commercial HEV-seroassays. Material and methods. After identifying hepatitis E in an index patient returning from a journey to India all 24 members of this journey were tested for anti-HEV-IgG and IgM using two commercial seroassays (Wantai and Mikrogen), for HEV-RNA by PCR and HEV-Ag by an antigen-assay (Wantai). Results. 5/24 (21%) individuals were viraemic with viral loads between 580-4,800,000 IU/mL. Bilirubin and ALT levels in these patients ranged from 1.3-14.9 mg/dL (mean 7.3 mg/dL, SD 5.6 mg/dL) and 151-4,820 U/L (mean 1,832U/L, SD 1842U/L), respectively and showed significant correlations with viral loads (r = 0.863, p < 0.001; r = 0.890, p < 0.001). No risk factor for food-borne HEV-transmission was identified. All viraemic patients (5/5) tested positive for anti-HEV-IgG and IgM in the Wantai-assay but only 4/5 in the Mikrogen-assay. Wantai-HEV-antigen-assay was negative in all patients. Six months later all previously viraemic patients tested positive for anti-HEV-IgG and negative for IgM in both assays. However, two non-viremic individuals who initially tested Wantai-IgM-positive stayed positive indicating false positive results. Conclusions. Despite the exact number of exposed individuals could not be determined HEV genotype 1 infections have a high manifestation rate of more than 20%.The Wantai-antigen-test failed, the Wantai-IgMrapid-test and the Mikrogen-IgM-recomblot showed a better performance but still they cannot replace real-time PCR for diagnosing ongoing HEV-infections.