ABSTRACT
Objective:To evaluate the business performance of an urban public tertiary hospital in Jiangsu province since the comprehensive reform of urban public hospitals started from the end of 2015, for reference in developing relevant policies.Methods:Such level-1 indicators as risk management ability, asset operation ability, revenue and expenditure structure management, asset profitability and future development ability were selected based on literature review, along with 14 level-2 indicators, to build an operation performance appraisal indicator system for urban public hospitals. The entropy weight TOPSIS method was used to evaluate the business performance of an urban public hospital in Jiangsu province from 2015 to 2019.Results:The drugs proportion(a level-2 indicator) under the revenue and expenditure structure management, the growth rate of fixed assets(a level-2 indicator) under the future development ability, and the total return(a level-2 indicator) under the asset profitability, were important ones affecting the business performance of hospitals, with the weights of 0.099, 0.097 and 0.080 respectively. The business operation performance ranking as calculated by the relative closeness, was 2015(0.515), 2016(0.480), 2019(0.467), 2018(0.450) and 2017(0.356) respectively.Conclusions:The reform once resulted in fluctuations in the operation performance of this hospital, with constant declines from 2015 to 2017. With the deepening reform, its performance recovered after 2018 to some extent. It is suggested to improve the business operation performance of urban public hospitals by optimizing their income and expenditure structure, improving their asset operation ability, and matching rationally their asset liability structure, among other measures.
ABSTRACT
OBJECTIVE：To establish the eva luation criteria for the rationality of tumor nutritional standardized treatment ，and to provide reference for nutritional standardized treatment in tumer patients . METHODS ：Based on domestic and foreign guidelines or expert consensus ，the rationality evaluation standard of tumor nutritional standardized treatmentwas formulated in our hospital （Bozhou Municipal People ’s Hospital ）. 50 nutritional treatment medical records in our hospital from Jan. to Jun. 2019 were evaluated by weighted TOPSIS ；according to the evaluation results ，nutritional intervention was carried out ，and 50 nutritional treatment medical records （group B ）from Aug. to Dec. 2019 were re-evaluated by the same method after intervention. RESULTS ： The established evaluation criteria for the rationality of tumor nutritional standardized treatment in our hospital included 18 indicators，such as malnutrition diagnosis ，description of the nature of malnutrition ，nutrition screening and evaluation ，etc. After analysis ，the rational rate of nutritional treatment was only 18％ in group A （Ci of ideal solution with 9 medical records≥0.6），and 78％ in group B （Ci of ideal solution with59 medical records ≥0.6）. There was statistical significance in the rationality of nutritional treatment before and after nutritional intervention （Ci≥0.6）（P＜0.05）. CONCLUSIONS ：The established rational evaluation method of tumor nutritional standardized treatment is feasible ，and the evaluation results are intuitive and reasonable. Nutrition intervention is helpful to reduce the irrational rate of nutritional treatment.
ABSTRACT
OBJECTIVE：To provide reference for performance evaluation of pharmaceutical care for clinical pharmacists. METHODS：Based on literature review ，weighted TOPSIS method was used to formulate a performance evaluation system of pharmaceutical care. The performance of 120 pharmaceutical care work of 5 clinical pharmacists in our hospital from Jan. 2017 to Dec. 2018 was evaluated. RESULTS ：The performance evaluation detailed rules of clinical pharmacists ’pharmaceutical care work were successfully constructed ，including pharmaceutical ward round ，medication education ，medication consultation and pharmacy consultation，with a total of 17 evaluation indicators. Among 120 cases，there were 21 cases with relative approach degree ＞0.6 （17.5％）；73 cases had relative approach degree between 0.5 and ＜0.6（60.8％）；26 cases had relative approach degree between 0.4 and ＜0.5（21.7％）. The major problem was that the participation of clinical pharmacists in muti-disciplinary treatment ，the approval of scientific research fund projects were insufficient and not much paper was written. CONCLUSIONS ：The performance evaluation system of clinical pharmacists ’pharmaceutical care work based on weighted TOPSIS method is normative and reasonable，and it can be used in the evaluation of clinical pharmacists ’pharmaceutical care work . The results suggest that there are some defects in the performance of clinical pharmacists ’pharmaceutical care work in our hospital ，which need to be improved.
ABSTRACT
OBJECTIVE:To provide reference for rational application of Levofloxacin hydrochloride injection in the clinic. METHODS:With reference to the package insert of Levofloxacin hydrochloride injection,the guiding principles of clinical use of antibiotics,by reviewing related literatures,based on the weighted TOPSIS methods,detailed rules for drug utilization review (DUR) of Levofloxacin hydrochloride injection were made. And then 100 archived medical records of Levofloxacin hydrochloride injection in the first half of 2014 were evaluated in respect of medication rationality based on these rules. RESULTS:Among 100 cases,relative proximity of 51 cases was more than 70%(51.0%);that of 37 was between 50%-70%(37.0%);that of 12 cases was between 30%-50%(12.0%). CONCLUSIONS:Established DUR method of Levofloxacin hydrochloride injection on the basis of weighted TOPSIS methods can be used to evaluate the rationality of drug use and promote more rational evaluation behavior. And the results indicate that unreasonable use of Levofloxacin hydrochloride injection is still common in the hospital.
ABSTRACT
Objective Using principal components analysis and weighted TOPSIS method to make objective and accurate evaluation of hospital operation management quality.This aims at proving whether such methods are scientific and feasible for comprehensive evaluation for the quality of hospital operation management and providing the basis for hospital decision making.Methods 15 typical Hospital Performance Indicators were chosen from a cancer hospital during 2008-2012,which were subject to TOPSIS method and principal components analysis,weighted TOPSIS method for comprehensive evaluation.Results The results with principal components analysis and weighted TOPSIS method conform to the actual hospital conditions and prove the rising quality of operation management of the hospital.That is,the closer the date,the higher the ranking.Conclusion Principal components analysis and weighted TOPSIS method are proven flexible,practical,scientific and reliable and suitable for popularization and application in the quality evaluation of hospital operation management.
ABSTRACT
Weighted topsis method is applied to evaluate the key factors in medical management of diabetes mellitus.The key factors are admission examinations,drug selection,patient serf-management skills,nursing quality,and physicians'capability.