ABSTRACT
Objective:To investigate the effect of different scanning modes, detector width and location in detector on high and low contrast resolution of wide-detector CT image.Methods:The Catphan600 phantom with high and low contrast resolution modules was scanned with GE Revolution CT at the same CTDI vol. The scans were performed with the detector widths of 40, 80 and 160 mm for sequential scanning mode and with the detector width/pitch combinations of 40 mm/0.516, 40 mm/0.984, 80 mm/0.508 and 80 mm/0.992 for spiral scanning mode. The resolution modules were placed at the adjacent region between two sequential scans, central and foot side edge in the longitudinal scanning range seperately. The subjective evaluation of the high and low contrast resolution was performed by two radiologists. Results:The high contrast resolution was 8 LP/cm at adjacent region between two sequential scans with the detector width of 80 mm or 160 mm in sequential scanning mode, and at the pitch of 0.5 in spiral scanning mode, while it was 7 LP/cm for the rest of detector combinations. The distinguishable diameter was 3 mm at 1% low contrast resolution at foot side edge with the detector widths of 80 mm or 160 mm in the sequential scanning mode, and it was 2 mm for all the other conditions. The distinguishable diameter was 2 mm at 1% low contrast resolution with the detector width of 40 mm and pitch 0.516 in the spiral scanning mode and it was worse with the wider detector and larger pitch.Conclusions:For the wide-detector CT, scanning mode, detector width, location in detector and pitches will affect the high and low contrast resolution to some degree. Appropriate selection should be done according to actual needs in clinical practice.
ABSTRACT
Objective To explore the distribution characteristics on z-axis of scattered radiation from a wide-detector CT with different scan modes and detector widths.Methods The CT standard-dose phantom was scanned using a 16 cm wide detector Revolution CT.Thermoluminescent dosimeters (TLDs)were placed on the central axis (z-axis) of the scan hole at given intervals.As scan modes,both axial scan mode (using detector with width in 4,8 or 16 cm) and the helical scan mode (using detector with width in 4 and 8 cm) are used.The scan parameters were as follows:tube voltage 120 kV;effective tube current 200 mAs;scan length 16 cm;pitch (for helical scan):0.984 ∶ 1 and 0.516 ∶ 1,and all scans were repeated for 4 times.All TLDs were measured,after exposure,and divided by four for further analysis.Results The scattered radiation on z-axis was higher at the direction of human head than at the direction of human foot (Z=-2.366,-2.197,-2.366,-2.371,-2.028,-2.236,-2.028,P＜0.05).Under the axial scan,the difference in distribution of scattered radiation with different detector widths was statistically significant.The maximum increase for detector width of 4 cm and 16 cm was 67.5 μ Gy(x2=28.000,P＜0.05).Under the helical scan,the difference in distribution of scattered radiation with different detector widths was statistically significant (Z =-3.233,-2.982,P＜0.05).The largest distribution of scattered radiation was found when the detector width was 8 cm and the smallest at the detector width is 4 cm.The maximum increase for detector width of 8 and 4 cm was 97.67 μGy at a pitch of 0.516 ∶ 1.Furthermore,when the detector width and effective mAs were the same,the scattered radiation at a pitch of 0.516∶1 was greater than that at a pitch of 0.984 ∶ 1,with the statistically significant difference(Z =-3.296,-3.296,P＜0.05).The maximum increase was 49.95 μGy when the detector width was 8 cm.Conclusions In a 16 cm wide-detector CT,the selection of different detector widths can significantly influence the distribution of radiation field and related radiation values.Suitable detector width and relevant parameters shall be chosen according to the specific clinical requirements so as to reduce the radiation doses to workers,patients and carers.