ABSTRACT
AIM:To evaluate corrective effect and stability of corneal morphology in patients with moderate to high myopia after 2a treatment of femtosecond laser assisted laser in situ keratomileusis(FS-LASIK)Xtra.METHODS:Retrospective case-control study. A total of 30 cases(58 eyes)Patients with moderate to high myopia combined with astigmatism who planned to undergo refractive surgery in our hospital from August 2019 to August 2020 were included, and different types of surgery were performed respectively based on the relevant index of keratoconus screening in the preoperative corneal topography. They were divided into FS-LASIK group and Xtra group, with 15 cases(29 eyes)in each group. Uncorrected visual acuity(UCVA), best corrected visual acuity(BCVA), spherical equivalent(SE)and the corneal curvature of the anterior and posterior surfaces of different diameters(3, 5 and 7 mm)measured by Sirius three-dimensional corneal topography were observed preoperatively and 3 mo, 1 and 2 a postoperatively.RESULTS: The UCVA of the two groups of patients at different time points after surgery was significantly increased compared with preoperatively(both P<0.01), and there was no difference in UCVA and SE between the two groups(P>0.05). After 2 a postoperatively, residual astigmatism was -0.25-0 D in 25 eyes(86%)of the FS-LASIK Xtra group and 24 eyes(83%)of the FS-LASIK group. The actual corrected SE and expected corrected SE of both groups were positively correlated(both P<0.05). There were differences in corneal curvature on the surface of different diameter areas(3, 5, and 7 mm)between the two groups at 3 mo, 1, and 2 a postoperatively compared with preoperatively. After 1 and 2 a postoperatively, the corneal posterior surface curvature of the FS-LASIK Xtra group with corneal diameter of 3 and 5 mm was higher than that of the FS-LASIK group(P<0.05).CONCLUSIONS:FS-LASIK Xtra has good safety, efficacy and predictability in correcting patients with moderate to high myopia.
ABSTRACT
Purpose: To analyze the efficacy, safety, predictability, and stability in myopic and astigmatic small?incision lenticule extraction (SMILE) with simultaneous prophylactic corneal crosslinking (CXL) in thin corneas. Methods: A total of 48 eyes from 24 patients who underwent myopic and astigmatism SMILE with simultaneous prophylactic CXL were included in this retrospective study. All patients had a 24?month follow?up. A femtosecond laser was performed with VisuMax (Carl Zeiss Meditec). CXL treatment was applied when the predicted stromal thickness was less than 330 ?m. Results: The patients’ mean age was 31.58 ± 6.23 years. The previous mean spherical equivalent was ? 6.85 ± 1.80 (?9.75 to ? 2.00) D. The postoperative mean spherical equivalent was ? 0.50 ± 0.26 (?1.00 to + 0.25) D; 60% of the eyes had 20/20 or better; 19% lost one line; 58% were within ± 0.50 D; and 8.3% of the eyes changed 0.50 D or more between 3 and 24 months. Conclusion: Prophylactic CXL with simultaneous SMILE for myopia and astigmatism femtosecond laser surgery technique appears to be partially effective, safe, predictable, and stable after 24 months of follow?up
ABSTRACT
PURPOSE: To compare the clinical outcome of combined small incision lenticule extraction and collagen cross-linking (SMILE Xtra) with SMILE. METHODS: This study included 30 eyes from 15 patients who had undergone SMILE Xtra and a random sample of 30 eyes from 15 patients receiving SMILE alone during the same period. We obtained the following parameters from all patients: uncorrected (UDVA) and corrected distance visual acuity (CDVA), spherical equivalent (SE), efficacy and safety index, and corneal high-order aberrations. RESULTS: The SMILE Xtra group had higher preoperative SE and thinner central corneal and residual stromal bed thickness and optic zone diameter compared to the control group (p < 0.001). At 6 months, there was no significant difference in UDVA or CDVA between the two groups. The efficacy indices were 0.97 ± 0.16 and 1.05 ± 0.17 in the SMILE Xtra and control groups, respectively (p = 0.044), and there was no significant difference in safety index between the two groups during the follow-up period. Total corneal high-order aberrations numbered 2.59 ± 0.56 and 2.02 ± 0.41 in the SMILE Xtra and control groups, respectively (p < 0.001), and there was significant increase in spherical aberration and horizontal corneal aberration in both groups compared to preoperative results. Corneal haze was observed in 20% of eyes in the SMILE Xtra group, and no complication such as corneal ectasia was observed during the follow-up period. CONCLUSIONS: SMILE Xtra had good early clinical outcome compared to SMILE alone. It appears that SMILE Xtra can be a good modality when the cornea is thin or SE is high. However, postoperative corneal haze should be considered.
Subject(s)
Humans , Collagen , Cornea , Dilatation, Pathologic , Follow-Up Studies , Visual AcuityABSTRACT
PURPOSE: To compare the clinical outcome of combined small incision lenticule extraction and collagen cross-linking (SMILE Xtra) with SMILE. METHODS: This study included 30 eyes from 15 patients who had undergone SMILE Xtra and a random sample of 30 eyes from 15 patients receiving SMILE alone during the same period. We obtained the following parameters from all patients: uncorrected (UDVA) and corrected distance visual acuity (CDVA), spherical equivalent (SE), efficacy and safety index, and corneal high-order aberrations. RESULTS: The SMILE Xtra group had higher preoperative SE and thinner central corneal and residual stromal bed thickness and optic zone diameter compared to the control group (p < 0.001). At 6 months, there was no significant difference in UDVA or CDVA between the two groups. The efficacy indices were 0.97 ± 0.16 and 1.05 ± 0.17 in the SMILE Xtra and control groups, respectively (p = 0.044), and there was no significant difference in safety index between the two groups during the follow-up period. Total corneal high-order aberrations numbered 2.59 ± 0.56 and 2.02 ± 0.41 in the SMILE Xtra and control groups, respectively (p < 0.001), and there was significant increase in spherical aberration and horizontal corneal aberration in both groups compared to preoperative results. Corneal haze was observed in 20% of eyes in the SMILE Xtra group, and no complication such as corneal ectasia was observed during the follow-up period. CONCLUSIONS: SMILE Xtra had good early clinical outcome compared to SMILE alone. It appears that SMILE Xtra can be a good modality when the cornea is thin or SE is high. However, postoperative corneal haze should be considered.