Evaluación del Rendimiento y Producción de Humedad de los Humidificadores de Burbuja usados con Mascarillas Oxígeno de Concentración Variable / Evaluation of the Performance and Humidity Production of Bubble Humidifiers used with Variable Concentration Oxygen Masks

Introducción. Introducción. El uso de humidificadores de burbuja asociados a equipos de oxigenoterapia es una práctica común en los centros hospitalarios de nuestro país. Sin embargo, no se ha evaluado el aporte real de humedad que entregan estos equipos cuando son usados con sistemas de concentración variable a distintas concentraciones de oxígeno. Además, se han descrito problemas de funcionamiento en la entrega de oxígeno cuando se han ocupado este tipo de humidificador. Objetivo. Determinar el aporte real de humedad que entregan los humidificadores de burbuja al ser usados con sistemas de oxigenoterapia de concentración variable. Métodos. Se evaluaron 10 humidificadores de burbuja, marca Hudson RCI®, con válvula liberadora de presión, los cuales se conectaron a un sistema de oxigenoterapia de concentración variable (Marca Hudson RCI®, modelo MULTI-VENT). La medición de la humedad relativa (HR) se realizó en una cámara de acrílico, donde se conectó el inyector del sistema de oxigenoterapia. Para medir H.R. y temperatura se utilizó un higrómetro digital (Veto®, Italia) y un higrómetro análogo (Hygromat®, Alemania). Cada medición requirió un tiempo de 5 minutos para lograr un valor estable. Se realizaron mediciones de la humedad relativa y temperatura entregada por este sistema, con y sin humidificador, a concentraciones de oxígeno de 0.24, 0.26, 0.28, 0.3, 0.35, 0.4 y 0.5. Resultados. Para las la temperatura, no hubo diferencias entre las mediciones realizadas con y sin humidificador de burbuja. Para la humedad relativa, sólo hubo diferencias estadísticamente significativas a concentraciones de oxígeno altas (> 0.35), pero con escaso cambio en la entrega de humedad absoluta. Cuando se utilizó flujos operativos ≥ 6 L/min se activó la válvula liberadora de presión del humidificador. Conclusión. El uso de humidificadores de burbuja asociados a sistemas de oxigenoterapia de concentración variable no genera un aumento significativo de la humedad entregada a concentraciones bajas de oxigeno, por lo cual se podría prescindir de su uso.

Background. The use of bubble humidifiers associated with oxygen therapy equipment is a common practice in hospitals in our country. However, the real contribution of humidity delivered by these equipments when used with variable concentration systems at different oxygen concentrations has not been evaluated. In addition, operating problems have been described in the delivery of oxygen when this type of humidifier has been used. Objetive. Determine the real contribution of humidity delivered by bubble humidifiers when used with variable concentration oxygen therapy systems. Methods. 10 Hudson RCI® brand bubble humidifiers with a pressure release valve were evaluated, which were connected to a variable concentration oxygen therapy system (Hudson RCI® brand, MULTI-VENT model). The relative humidity (RH) was measured in an acrylic chamber, where the injector of the oxygen therapy system was connected. To measure R.H. and temperature, a digital hygrometer (Veto®, Italy) and an analog hygrometer (Hygromat®, Germany) were used. Each measurement required a time of 5 minutes to achieve a stable value. Measurements of the relative humidity and temperature delivered by this system were made, with and without a humidifier, at oxygen concentrations of 0.24, 0.26, 0.28, 0.3, 0.35, 0.4 and 0.5. Results. For temperature, there were no differences between the measurements made with and without a bubble humidifier. For relative humidity, there were only statistically significant differences at high oxygen concentrations (> 0.35), but with little change in absolute humidity delivery. When operating flows ≥ 6 L/min were used, the humidifier pressure relief valve was activated. Conclusion. The use of bubble humidifiers associated with variable concentration oxygen therapy systems does not generate a significant increase in the humidity delivered at low oxygen concentrations, so their use could be dispensed with.

The role of absolute humidity in respiratory mortality in Guangzhou, a hot and wet city of South China

BACKGROUND@#For the reason that many studies have been inconclusive on the effect of humidity on respiratory disease, we examined the association between absolute humidity and respiratory disease mortality and quantified the mortality burden due to non-optimal absolute humidity in Guangzhou, China.@*METHODS@#Daily respiratory disease mortality including total 42,440 deaths from 1 February 2013 to 31 December 2018 and meteorological data of the same period in Guangzhou City were collected. The distributed lag non-linear model was used to determine the optimal absolute humidity of death and discuss their non-linear lagged effects. Attributable fraction and population attributable mortality were calculated based on the optimal absolute humidity, defined as the minimum mortality absolute humidity.@*RESULTS@#The association between absolute humidity and total respiratory disease mortality showed an M-shaped non-linear curve. In total, 21.57% (95% CI 14.20 ~ 27.75%) of respiratory disease mortality (9154 deaths) was attributable to non-optimum absolute humidity. The attributable fractions due to high absolute humidity were 13.49% (95% CI 9.56 ~ 16.98%), while mortality burden of low absolute humidity were 8.08% (95% CI 0.89 ~ 13.93%), respectively. Extreme dry and moist absolute humidity accounted for total respiratory disease mortality fraction of 0.87% (95% CI - 0.09 ~ 1.58%) and 0.91% (95% CI 0.25 ~ 1.39%), respectively. There was no significant gender and age difference in the burden of attributable risk due to absolute humidity.@*CONCLUSIONS@#Our study showed that both high and low absolute humidity are responsible for considerable respiratory disease mortality burden, the component attributed to the high absolute humidity effect is greater. Our results may have important implications for the development of public health measures to reduce respiratory disease mortality.

El frasco humidificador como sistema de humidificación del gas inspirado no cumple con las recomendaciones. Evaluación y comparación de tres sistemas de humidificación. Estudio de laboratorio / The humidifier bottle as humidification system of the inspired gas does not meet with the recommendations. Evaluation and comparison of three humidification systems. Laboratory study

Objetivos. Demostrar que el frasco humidificador (FH), como sistema de humidificación del gas inspirado, no alcanza los valores mínimos de humedad relativa (HR), humedad absoluta (HA) y temperatura (Tº) recomendados por la literatura. Secundariamente, comparar el rendimiento del FH y dos sistemas activos de humidificación (SAH). Materiales y métodos. Las variables principales fueron T° del agua, HR, Tº y HA del gas entregado. Se realizaron mediciones a diferentes niveles de Tº, volumen de agua y flujos. Resultados. El FH no alcanzó los valores recomendados de HR 100%, HA 30 mg/l y Tº 31ºC. El SAH sin circuito calefaccionado alcanzó valores recomendados en el NIVEL III con flujos de 20-60lpm, y en el NIVEL II con flujos de 20-30lpm. El SAH con circuito calefaccionado logró valores sugeridos en los NIVELES II y III (20-60lpm). Se encontró diferencia significativa (p<0,001 Global) para flujo, Tº y tipo de humidificador. El modelo ANOVA arrojó significación estadística (p<0,001) del término interacción de flujo y tipo de humidificador en cada nivel de Tº. Conclusiones. El FH no acondiciona el gas de acuerdo a lo recomendado. El mejor rendimiento fue con 300 ml y flujo de 1 lpm: Tº 23,92(±0,69), HR 74,02%(±6,53) y HA 16,02 mg/l (±1,86), estos valores apenas superan el 50% de lo mínimo sugerido en la literatura. Los SAH acondicionaron el gas adecuadamente. El modelo ANOVA arroja que existen otros factores involucrados en mantener la HA y que la significación varía en cada tipo de humidificador a cada nivel de flujo(AU)

Objetive. To demonstrate that humidifier bottle (HB) as inspired gas humidification system does not attain the minimum values of relative humidity (RH), absolute humidity (AH) and temperature (Tº) as recommended by the literature. Furthermore, to compare the HB performance with two active humidification systems (AHS). Materials and Methods. Main variables were: water Tº, RH, Tº and AH of delivered gas. Measurements were made at different levels of Tº, water and flows volume. Results. Recommended values of RH 100%, AH 30 mg/l and Tº 31º C were not reached by the HB. AHS without heating circuit reached recommended values in LEVEL III with flows of 20-60 lpm, and in LEVEL II with flows of 20-30lpm. AHS with heating circuit obtained recommended values in LEVELS II and III (20-60lpm). A significant difference (p<0.001 Global) for flow, Tº and humidifier type was found. ANOVA model showed statistical evidence (p<0.001) of interaction between flow and type of humidifier in each Tº level. Conclusions. The HB does not condition gas in accordance with recommended values. The best performance was with 300ml and 1lpm flow: Tº 23.92 (±0.69), RH 74.02% (±6.53) and AH 16.02 mg/l (±1.86) and these values hardly exceed the 50% of minimum recommended by literature. AHS conditioned gas in a proper way. ANOVA model shows that there exist other factors involved to maintain AH and that there are important differences between each type of humidifier and each flow level.(AU)

Humidity of Inspired Gases in Partial Rebreathing Anesthesia Method with and without Bird Humidifier / 대한마취과학회지

BACKGROUND: Adequate humidification of anesthetic gases has been recommended both for the prevention of pulmonary damage during endotracheal anesthesia and for the maintenance of body temperature, especially in long-duration operated patients. Partial rebreathing anesthesia technique frequently lacks adequate humidity. So, this study was designed to compare inspired humidities in partial rebreathing anesthesia method with and without humidifier in the system. METHODS: The author examined inspired humidity using a controlled partial rebreathing anesthesia method with and without Bird humidifier in 10 and 22 healthy adult patients respectively. The patients were divided into two groups (1 and 2). All patients were anesthetized with pancuronium, halothane or enflurane, nitrous oxide-oxygen, 50-50 per cent, and their lungs were mechanically ventilated. Inspired humidity was measured for three hours at 30-min intervals in both groups. RESULTS: Significant differences were found among group 1- and 2-inspired humidities for 3 hours. While group 2-inspired humidity remained constant between 13 and 16 mgH2O/L during entire anesthesia procedure group 1-inspired humidity remained under 9 mgH2O/L. CONCLUSIONS: The humidities in all partial rebreathing anesthesia method with Bird humidifier not only exceeded those of method without humidifier but also seemed to be high enough to prevent dysfunction of tracheobronchial ciliated epithelium, while the standard partial rebreathing anesthesia method does not provide adequate inspired humidity.

Effects of Six Heat and Miosture Exchange for Use during Endotracheal Anesthesia / 대한마취과학회지

Despite many theoretical advantages of humidification of anesthetic gas, the role and method of choice of humidification in anesthesia remains uncertain. With the recent introduction of disposable heat and moisture exchangers (HME), a paueity of information of the specific performance characteristics of various HMEs exists. Using an on-line humidity detector, based on the dry-wet bulb principle, with a fast response temperature sensor (0.l sec), I have reexamined the effectiveness in maintaining humidity and temperature of various commercially available HMEs in clinical settings, and the relationship of the effectiveness of the rate of fresh gas flow. Humid-Vent 2 demonstrated the best result that increased the inspired temperature from 22.78+/-0.2degrees C to 31.35+/-0.89degrees C (absolute humidity; 27.4+/-0.7mg H2O/L). Extreme low fresh gas flow(500ml/min) demonstrated low absolute humidity (18.87+/-1.28 mg H2O/L) that was lower than use of HME.

Effects of Six Heat and Miosture Exchange for Use during Endotracheal Anesthesia / 대한마취과학회지

Despite many theoretical advantages of humidification of anesthetic gas, the role and method of choice of humidification in anesthesia remains uncertain. With the recent introduction of disposable heat and moisture exchangers (HME), a paueity of information of the specific performance characteristics of various HMEs exists. Using an on-line humidity detector, based on the dry-wet bulb principle, with a fast response temperature sensor (0.l sec), I have reexamined the effectiveness in maintaining humidity and temperature of various commercially available HMEs in clinical settings, and the relationship of the effectiveness of the rate of fresh gas flow. Humid-Vent 2 demonstrated the best result that increased the inspired temperature from 22.78+/-0.2degrees C to 31.35+/-0.89degrees C (absolute humidity; 27.4+/-0.7mg H2O/L). Extreme low fresh gas flow(500ml/min) demonstrated low absolute humidity (18.87+/-1.28 mg H2O/L) that was lower than use of HME.