ABSTRACT
Objective To study the relationship between adolescent scoliosis and various biomechanical factors. Methods A total of 637 students in grade four to six in a primary school of Zhaoyang District in Zhaotong,Yunnan,Chi-na were screened for scoliosis in December,2016.Finally,a case control study of 19 patients with idiopathic sco-liosis who had been diagnosed by X-ray was carried out.According to the matching criteria,42 students were col-lected as control group.Then,eleven biomechanical factors were analyzed and evaluated in two groups.Those factors included unequal shoulders,cervical lateral flexion,cervical rotation,thoracic lateral flexion,thoracic ro-tation,lumbar lateral flexion,lumbar rotation,lateral tilt of pelvis,anterior and posterior pelvic tilt,leg inequality and flat foot. Eventually, the biomechanical factors were statistically analyzed with binary Logistic regression analysis. Results and Conclusion The unequal shoulders,thoracic rotation,lateral tilt of pelvis,leg inequality and flat foot were the risk factors for scoliosis(P<0.05).Detailed posture assessment should be carried out to find the biomechani-cal factors leading to abnormal posture,and achieve the goals of the more targeted medical intervention for the patients with spinal asymmetry.
ABSTRACT
Adolescent scoliosis is spinal deformity happening in early adolescent or before bone mature.It can affect the body figure and appearance of children,threat the physical and mental health of the youth.Serious malformation even leads to heart and lung function failure.This paper summarizes the causes of disease incidence,the incidence situation in domestic and abroad,census method,the latest gene chip technique,the latest progress of treatment,and investigates the method of early prevention,early diagnosis,and early treatment.For younger children,non-surgical treatment such as brace could be used to avoid scoliosis aggravating.
ABSTRACT
OBJECTIVE: To determine the relation of Radiographic Scoring System and Scoliosis Research Society-22 (SRS-22), a revised form of health-related quality-of-life (HRQL) questionnaire in idiopathic adolescent scoliosis patients. METHOD: A patient group was made up of 41 adolescents who were diagnosed as idiopathic scoliosis. A control group of 17 persons with Cobb's angle <10degrees was established. To evaluate psychosocial condition, SRS-22 was used to collect the data on both patient and control group. Roentgenographic study was conducted to obtain the Radiographic Deformity Score and evaluate the curve pattern. RESULTS: Pain, self image/appearance, mental health and total score of SRS domains were found to be significantly different between patient and control group (p<0.05). Radiog raphic Deformity Score was positively correlated with pain and self image of SRS domains (p<0.05). However, the pattern of curve was found to be not correlated with SRS score. CONCLUSION: We could evaluate a psychologic condition of idiopathic adolescent scoliosis using Scoliosis Research Society-22 (SRS-22) health-related quality-of-life (HRQL) questionnaire. The more severe spinal deformity, it had the more negative influence on psychologic conditions in idiopathic adolescent scoliosis patients. Therefore, the clinician who is managing idiopathic adolescent scoliosis patients should consider their psychosocial conditions.
Subject(s)
Adolescent , Humans , Congenital Abnormalities , Mental Health , Surveys and Questionnaires , ScoliosisABSTRACT
STUDY DESIGN: Consecutive, prospective, radiographic review of adolescent idiopathic scoliosis (AIS) patients. OBJECTIVE: To analyze the change of Cobb angle according to position in AIS. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: Cobb angle on standing radiographs was corrected spontaneously while the patients were in the supine position. However, there are few reports on Cobb angle in standing versus supine position in AIS. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We checked AP plain radiographs of 101 AIS patients, 18 male and 83 female, in standing and supine position. Sixty-three cases were under Risser stage V and 38 were Risser stage V. In standing plain radiograph, 27 cases were in Cobb angle 10-19 degrees, 35 in 20-29 degrees, 15 in 30-39 degrees, and 24 over 40 degrees. According to curve pattern, 31 curves were classified as King type I, 32 as type II, 8 as type III, 11 as type IV, 17 as type V, 1 thoracolumbar curve and 1 lumbar curve. Cobb angle reduction was measured on AP radiographs from each group, according to sex, maturation, Cobb angle and curve pattern. RESULTS: Average reduction of Cobb angle was 8.2 degrees(range, 1-21 degrees ), 6.4 degrees for male and 8.6 degrees for female (p=0.19). The reduction value according to maturation was 8.3 degrees for the growing group and 8.0 degrees for the grown group (p=0.73). The average reduction value in Cobb angle 10-19 degrees was 5.4 degrees(40.3%), 20-29 degrees was 7.1 degrees(30.9%), 30-39 degrees was 8.6 degrees(25.7%) and over 40 degrees was 12.8 degrees (23.6%) (p=0.001). The reduction rate decreased in proportion to Cobb angle measured in standing position. The reduction value was 8.2 degrees in King type I curves, 8.6 degrees in type II, 9.1 degrees in type III, 9.1 degrees in type IV and 6.2 degrees in type V (p=0.238). CONCLUSION: An average 8 degrees Cobb angle reduction in supine position, compared with standing position, can influence treatment strategy in AIS patients, because a Cobb angle change more than 5-6 degrees is a threshold value to decide curve worsening. Thus, serial Cobb angle measurement should be performed in standing position.