The Role of Adrenergic and Cholinergic Receptors on the Antinociception of Korean Red Ginseng in the Spinal Cord of Rats / 대한통증학회지

BACKGROUND: Experimental evidence indicates that ginseng modulate the nociceptive transmission. Authors examined the role of adrenergic and cholinergic receptors on the antinociceptive action of Korean red ginseng against the formalin-induced pain at the spinal level. METHODS: Catheters were inserted into the intrathecal space of male Sprague-Dawley rats. Fifty microl of 5% formalin solution was injected to the hindpaw for induction of pain and formalin-induced pain (flinching response) was observed. The role of spinal adrenergic and cholinergic receptors on the effect of Korean red ginseng was assessed by antagonists (prazosin, yohimbine, atropine and mecamylamine). RESULTS: Intrathecal Korean red ginseng produced a dose-dependent suppression of the flinching response in the rat formalin test. All of prazosin, yohimbine, atropine and mecamylamine antagonized the antinociception of Korean red ginseng. CONCLUSIONS: Spinal Korean red ginseng is effective against acute pain and facilitated pain state evoked by formalin injection. All of alpha 1, alpha 2, muscarinic and nicotinic receptors may play an important role in the antinociceptive action of Korean red ginseng at the spinal level.

The Role of Adrenergic and Cholinergic Receptors on the Antinociception of Intrathecal Zaprinast in the Formalin Test of Rats / 대한마취과학회지

BACKGROUND: Spinal zaprinast, phospodiesterase inhibitor, has been shown to have an antinociception through an increase of cGMP. The aim of this study was to examine the role of spinal adrenergic and cholinergic receptors on the antinociceptive action of intrathecal zaprinast. METHODS: Rats were implanted with lumbar intrathecal catheters. After formalin injection, formalin-induced nociceptive behavior (flinching response) was observed for 60 min. After observing the effect of intrathecal zaprinast, antagonism of intrathecal prazosin, yohimbine, atropine and mecamylamine for the effect of zaprinast were evaluated. RESULTS: Intrathecal zaprinast produced a dose-dependent suppression of formalin-induced flinches in both phases of the formalin test. Intrathecal prazosin reversed the antinociception of zaprinast in phase 2, but not phase 1. Intrathecal yohimbine reversed the antinociception of zaprinast in both phases. Neither atropine nor mecamylamine reversed the antinocicetive action of zaprinast. CONCLUSIONS: Intrathecal zaprinast is against the nociceptive state evoked by formalin stimulus. Alpha 2 or alpha 1 adrenergic receptor, but not cholinergic receptors, may be related to the action of zaprinast in the spinal cord.