Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 5 de 5
Filter
Add filters








Language
Year range
1.
Chinese Journal of Blood Transfusion ; (12): 689-693, 2023.
Article in Chinese | WPRIM | ID: wpr-1004766

ABSTRACT

【Objective】 To analyze the blood transfusion and adverse reactions in myelodysplastic syndroms (MDS) patients, so as to improve transfusion management in MDS patients. 【Methods】 The diagnosis and treatment information of MDS patients with blood transfusion in our hospital from January 2003 to December 2022 were collected, and the component transfusion and adverse reactions were investigated. 【Results】 The average infusion volume of red blood cells(RBCs) and platelets were respectively (27.46±43.11 ) and (16.41±24.81 ) in 799 MDS patients, which had no correlation with gender and blood type. The incidence of adverse reactions was 18.27% (146/799), with the most common adverse reactions as delayed serologic transfusion reaction (DSTR) (9.01%, 72/799), followed by non hemolytic fever reaction (4.76%, 38/799) and allergic reaction (4.38%, 35/799). Compared with all patients with transfusion, DSTR was more common in females (P<0.05), with elder age and had more RBCs consumption (all P<0.01). 86.11%(62/72) were Rh system, and 40.28% (29/72) had 2 or more antibodies. The occurrence time of DSTR in some patients was not related to the volume of RBCs trans infusion. 【Conclusion】 MDS patients, with more average transfusion volume and higher incidence of adverse reactions especially DSTR, were recommended a strictly limited transfusion schedule and Rh phenotype matching RBC products. The investigation of immune status of MDS patients at different periods is helpful to provide new aspects and therapeutic measures for the pathogenesis of DSTR, and the antibody screening time may adjusted appropriately.

2.
Chinese Journal of Blood Transfusion ; (12): 622-628, 2022.
Article in Chinese | WPRIM | ID: wpr-1004221

ABSTRACT

【Objective】 To systematically evaluate the correlation between pretransfusion prophylactic medication and the incidence of adverse reactions to blood transfusion(ARBT) by Meta analysis. 【Methods】 The relevant literature concerning the effect of pretransfusion prophylactic medication on the incidence of ARBT was searched via Pubmed, Embase, Cochrane Library, CNKI, WanFang Data, and VIP databases, with the date duration from database creation to May 9, 2021. The literature was independently screened by two researchers according to the inclusion and exclusion criteria, relevant data information was extracted, quality evaluation was performed, and Meta analysis was performed using RevMan 5.3 software. 【Results】 A total of 36 publications were finally included, involving 137 996 transfusion recipients, of which 62 581 were administered medication before transfusion while 75 415 not. And1742 patients experienced ARBT. Meta analysis results showed that the incidence of ARBT in the pre-transfusion medication group was not statistically different from that in the non-medication group {[RR=0. 88, 95% CI(0.76, 1.01), P>0.05]}, the incidence of febrile reactions was lower in the pre-transfusion group than in the control {[RR=0. 72, 95% CI(0.61, 0.86), P0.05] vs [RR=0. 24, 95% CI(0.03, 2.13), P>0.05]. Pre-transfusion use of dexamethasone, isoproterenol, and niclosamide had no preventive effect on ARBT, i. e. [RR=0. 91, 95% CI(0.79, 1.04), P>0.05] vs [RR=0. 83, 95% CI(0.68, 1.01), P>0.05] vs [RR=1.21, 95% CI(0.69, 2.10), P>0.05]. 【Conclusion】 The incidence of ARBT in the pre-transfusion prophylaxis group was not significantly different from that in the control without considering the patient's history of transfusion, history of ARBT, and use of leukocyte-deleted blood products. The incidence of febrile reactions in the pre-transfusion medication group was lower than that in the control, and further studies in larger randomized controlled trials of higher quality still need to be established due to the suboptimal quality of the included literature and study size. Strictly grasping the indications for blood transfusion, strengthening the monitoring and awareness of ARBT, and using life-saving drugs rationally remain the key clinical concerns.

3.
Chinese Journal of Blood Transfusion ; (12): 795-799, 2022.
Article in Chinese | WPRIM | ID: wpr-1004166

ABSTRACT

【Objective】 To study the incidence and specificity of platelet antibody in blood donors in Suzhou, analyze the distribution characteristics of platelet antibody in blood donors in this area, and explore the significance of platelet antibody detection in blood donors to reduce the adverse reactions toplatelet transfusion in clinical. 【Methods】 Platelet antibody detection was performed in 2178 blood donors in this area by solid-phase immunosorbent assay. The antibody specificity of the positive samples was analyzed by commercial kit, and the anti-CD36 antibody positive samples were further identified by flow cytometry and gene sequencing. 【Results】 Twelve positive samples were detected by platelet antibody screening, with a positive rate of 0.55%(12/2 178), including 5 males (0.33%, 5/2 178)and 7 females(1.06%, 7/2 178). Among the positive samples, anti-HLA-Ⅰ antibody was identified in 2 cases, anti-CD36 antibody in 1 case, and the antibody specificity was not identified in the other 9 cases. In one case, the positive rate of anti-HLA-Ⅰ antibody PRA was 31.31%(31/ 99), which was mainly specific to anti-B15, anti-B35 and anti-B40. The positive rate of anti-HLA-Ⅰ antibody PRA in the other case was 45.45%(45/ 99), which was mainly specific to anti-A2, anti-A11, anti-A24, anti-A29, anti-A33, anti-A66, anti-B15 and anti-B35. The blood donor with anti-CD36 antibody was type I CD36 deficiency, and 329_330delAC mutation occurred in exon 5. 【Conclusion】 Through antibody screening and specificity identification, the positive rate of platelet antibody in females was significantly higher than that in males(P<0.05). In addition to the common anti-HLA-I antibodies, anti-CD36 antibody was also detected in type I CD36 deficient blood donor. Therefore, the detection of platelet antibodies in blood donors is of certain clinical significance to reduce the adverse reactions to blood transfusion caused by antibodies in platelet products.

4.
Chinese Journal of Blood Transfusion ; (12): 1259-1262, 2022.
Article in Chinese | WPRIM | ID: wpr-1004104

ABSTRACT

【Objective】 To investigate the incidence and composition of adverse reactions to blood transfusion(ARBT) in Qingdao hospitals in recent years. 【Methods】 The "Statistical Table of Adverse Reactions to Blood Transfusion in Medical Institutions" issued by Qingdao Quality Control Center of Blood Transfusion throughout 2020 to 2021, involving 96 hospitals in the region, were collected and analyzed, including the number, proportion and types of ARBT, as well as the types of blood components transfused. 【Results】 From 2020 to 2021, 296 676 cases of blood transfusion in 96 hospitals occurred, and the incidence of ARBT was 0.27% (814/296 676), of which the incidence of ARBT involving plasma transfusion was 0.17% [accounting for 39.07% (318/814) of all transfusion reactions], involving platelet transfusion was 0.68% [31.08% (259/814)], involving erythrocyte transfusion was 0.11% [27.64% (225/814)] and cryoprecipitation transfusion 0.03% [1.47% (12/814)]. The types of ARBT were anaphylaxis 77.64% (632/814), fever 19.78% (161/814), transfusion-related dyspnea 1.47% (12/814), transfusion-related circulatory overload 0.37% (3/814), purpura 0.25% (2/814) and transfusion-related hypotension 0.25% (2/814), delayed hemolysis 0.12%(1/814) and acute hemolysis 0.12%(1/814), respectively. 【Conclusion】 In recent years, the incidence of ARBT in local medical institutions is lower than that of domestic general level, and the main reactions are anaphylaxis and fever following the transfusion of plasma or (and) platelets.The monitoring and control of ARBT should be strengthened in each hospital with accurate and timely report, and active preventive measures should be taken to control or reduce the incidence of ARBT effectively.

5.
Chinese Journal of Blood Transfusion ; (12): 498-501, 2021.
Article in Chinese | WPRIM | ID: wpr-1004590

ABSTRACT

【Objective】 To explore the incidence of adverse reactions to blood transfusion in Wuxi, so as to provide theoretical basis for further improving the safety of blood transfusion in this area. 【Methods】 211 778 cases of blood transfusion in hospitals in Wuxi from 2017 to 2019 were collected, and the incidence of adverse reactions were retrospectively analyzed. 【Results】 From 2017 to 2019, 750 cases of adverse reactions occurred in Wuxi, with the incidence rate at 0.35%(750/211 778), which kept increasing year by year. The incidence of reactions relative to apheresis platelet transfusion was the highest, about 0.86% (accounting for 32.8%, 246/750), viral inactivated frozen plasma transfusion 0.1% (accounting for 30.4%, 228/750), showing an increasing trend year by year, suspension of leukocytes reduced RBC 0.12%(257/220 106), washed RBC 0.08%(5/6 439) and cryoprecipitate 0.02%(14/750) respectively (the above three accounting for 36.8%, 216/750). The adverse reactions were mainly allergic reactions (67.6%, 507/750) and febrile non-haemolytic transfusion reaction(FNHTR) (28.8%, 216/750), and the incidence of both increased year by year. In addition, there were 6 cases (0.8%, 6/750) of transfusion-associated circulation overload, 2 cases (0.27%, 2/750) of post transfusion purpura, 1 case (0.13%, 1/750) of transfusion-related acute lung injury and 18 miscellaneous cases (2.4%, 18/750). Further analysis revealed that red blood cell products were the main causes for FNHTR, and platelets and plasma products for allergic reactions. 【Conclusion】 The incidence of adverse reactions in Wuxi, mainly composed of allergic and febrile reactions caused by transfusions of blood components other than cryoprecipitate, was lower than the general level in China, but it kept increasing year by year. Measures should be taken by hospitals to strengthen the monitoring, reporting of adverse reactions, so as to prevent and further reduce the incidence of adverse reactions.

SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL