ABSTRACT
Background: High perianal fistula treatment remains challenging, mainly due to the variability in success and recurrence rates as well as continence impairment risks. So far, no procedure can be considered the gold standard for surgical treatment. Yet, strong efforts to identify effective and complication-free surgical options are ongoing. Fistulotomy can be considered the best perianal fistula treatment option, providing a perfect surgical field view, allowing direct access to the source of chronic inflammation. Controversy exists concerning the risk of continence impairment associated with fistulotomy. The present study aimed to assess the outcomes of fistulotomy with immediate sphincteric reconstruction regaring fistula recurrence, incontinence, and patient satisfaction. Methods: This interventional study was performed at the General Surgery Department of Zagazig University Hospital during the period from July 2018 to December 2019 on 24 patients with a clinical diagnosis of high transsphincteric fistula-in-ano. The fistulous tract was laid open over the probe placed in the tract. After the fistula tract had been laid open, the tract was curetted and examined for secondary extensions. Then, suturing muscles to muscles, including the internal and external sphincters, by transverse mattress sutures. Results: Our study showed that 2 patients develop incontinence to flatus ~ 8.3%.and only one patient develop incontinence to loose stool, 4.2%. Complete healing was achieved in 83% and recurrence was 16.6%. Conclusion: Fistulotomy with immediate sphincteric reconstruction is considered to be an effective option in the management of high perianal fistula, with low morbidity and high healing rate with acceptable continence state. (AU)
Subject(s)
Humans , Male , Female , Adolescent , Adult , Middle Aged , Aged , Anal Canal/surgery , Rectal Fistula/surgery , Rectal Fistula/therapy , Comorbidity , Treatment OutcomeABSTRACT
Objective@#To explorea long-term effect of in situ artificial anal reconstruction using five-combined-operation technique after lower rectal cancer resection.@*Methods@#After miles operation, 60 patients suffered with lower rectal cancers underwent in situ artificial anal reconstruction using five-combined-operation technique, which included internal and external anal sphincter, rectal flap, rectal angle, and anoperineal reconstruction.@*Results@#All cases in this study were performed successfully, with primary healing in the wounds. Awareness of defecation had reoccurred in all cases since 1 week postoperatively and self-control of defecation had been regained since 3 weeks postoperatively with formed stool excreted once or twice a day. Long-term follow-ups: ①In 95% cases, rectal controlled discharge time was longer than 2 minutes, which was significantly higher than that of sphincter reconstruction group as a control(P<0.05). ② Five-year survival rate reached to 88%, which was significantly higher than that of the control group(P<0.05).@*Conclusions@#Anal reconstruction using five-combined operation method after Miles operation could be a safe and effective surgical procedure, which could completely cure tumor, and improve patients′ life quality and long-term survival rate.
ABSTRACT
This paper delineate the definition,etiology and treatment of fecal incontinence,Initial management of fecal incontinence consists of supportive care and medical therapy.If patients fail to re-spond to initial management,such patients should undergo additional evaluation(such as anorectal manom-etry,endorectal ultrasound and magnetic resonance imaging)to detect functional and structural abnormali-ties causing fecal incontinence and to guide subsequent management.For patients who fail to respond to initial management,options include biofeedback,injectable anal bulking agent,sacral nerve stimulation, and anal sphincteroplasty.Dynamic graciloplasty and artificial anal sphincter devices are associated with significant morbidity and should therefore only be used to treat refractory fecal incontinence.Fecal diver-sion with a colostomy should be reserved for patients with intractable symptoms who are not candidates for any other therapy,or in whom other treatments have failed.