Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 20 de 37
Filter
1.
Article | IMSEAR | ID: sea-218832

ABSTRACT

Objective: Minor constriction which is the narrowest diameter is considered to be the appropriate apical limit of endodontic treatment. Apex locators provide greater precision, fewer procedural errors, less discomfort to the patient during measurement of working length. The aim of this article is to compare the accuracy of four electronic apex locators in detecting the apical constriction using histological sections as the gold standard. 80Materials and Methods: extracted single-rooted permanent teeth were selected and coronally flattened for stable reference point. Access cavity was prepared and canal patency was checked. Samples were embedded in alginate upto cemento-enamel junction. Working length was determined with the apex locators. A 15 K file adjusted to that reading was placed in the root canal and stabilized with flowable composite. Apical 4 mm of root was longitudinally sectioned and the position of the file in relation to the minor constriction was recorded for each tooth under stereomicroscope at 40X magnification. Chi-square test was carried out to test the difference in accuracy at various levels from the minor foramen. Kruskal Wallis Test was carried out to compare the differences between the study groups for the distance from the tip of the file relative to the minor foramen (P<0.05). Measurements of mean working lengths within ±0.5 mm of minor diameter were 85%Results: acceptable for CanalPro followed by Root ZX Mini (80%) and Propex Pixi (80%) and the least by DPEX V (65%). Conclusion: Accuracy of these instruments for detecting the minor diameter is acceptable for clinical practice

2.
Article in English | LILACS-Express | LILACS | ID: biblio-1385750

ABSTRACT

ABSTRACT: The aim of this in vitro study was to evaluate measurement accordance using an electronic apex locator for estimation of working length in endodontics when different restorative materials for interim crown restoration are utilized. For this study, 13 single-rooted premolars with endodontic occlusal access cavity were prepared. To establish the working length of each tooth, these were mounted in alginate and with the help of an electronic foramen locator and endodontic file K-file # 15, the working length was established. This length was later compared to the estimated working lengths using different intermediate restoration materials. These materials were: Superior Chemfil, Ketac ™ Molar Easymix and Filtek z350 resin. In the electronic measurements, an acceptable tolerance range of variation up to ± 0.5 mm was considered. Highest discrepancies were considered erroneous. For these measurements, central tendency and dispersion were analyzed. The Bland-Altman method was used, and the ANOVA test with a significance level of p <0,05 for statistic difference. Regarding measurements' acceptability and the type of interim restoration material utilized, 7 were acceptable, and 6 were unacceptable for ChemFil Superior, 12 were acceptable and 1 unacceptable for Ketac™ Molar Easymix, and 11 were acceptable and 2 were unacceptable for Filtek Z350 composite resin. The average difference between all electronic measurements was 0.29 (± 0.44). Chemfill Superior showed the most prominent variation between measurements 0.58 (± 0.45). When using an electronic apex locator, measurements showed statistically significant differences depending on the interim restoration material of choice (p<0.05). In conclusion, the measurement accordance using electronic apex locator to estimation the working length is higher, however the electronic estimation of working length can be significatively affected by the material chosen for interim temporary restoration.


RESUMEN: El objetivo de este estudio in vitro, fue evaluar la concordancia de las estimaciones de longitud de trabajo mediante localizador electrónico de foramen, utilizando diferentes materiales de restauración intermedia coronaria. Para tales fines fueron preparados 13 premolares uniradiculares con cavidad de acceso oclusal endodóntico. Para establecer la a longitud de trabajo de cada diente, estos fueron montados en alginato y con la ayuda de un localizador electrónico de foramen y lima de endodoncia K-file #15 fue establecida la longitud de trabajo. Esta longitud fue comparada posteriormente con las longitudes de trabajo estimadas utilizando diferentes materiales de restauración in- termedia. Estos materiales fueron: Chemfil superior, Ketac™ Molar Easymix y resina Filtek z350. En las mediciones electrónicas, se consideró un rango de tolerancia aceptable de variación hasta ± 0,5 mm. Las discrepancias mayores se consideraron erróneas. Se calcularon medidas de tendencia central y la dispersión. Se utilizó el método de Bland- Altman y la prueba ANOVA con un nivel de significancia de p <0,05. Con respecto a la aceptabilidad de las mediciones y el tipo de material de restauración intermedia, 7 fueron aceptables y 6 fueron inaceptables para ChemFil Superior, 12 fueron aceptables y 1 inaceptable para Ketac ™ Molar Easymix, y 11 fueron aceptables y 2 fueron inaceptables para el compuesto Filtek Z350 resina. La diferencia promedio entre todas las mediciones electrónicas fue de 0,29 (± 0,44). Chemfil Superior mostró la mayor variación entre medicio- nes 0,58 (± 0,45). Las mediciones mostraron diferencias estadísticamente significativas dependiendo del material de restauración intermedio elegido (p <0,05). En conclusión, la concordancia en la estimación de la longitud de trabajo usando localizador electrónico de foramen es alta, sin embargo, puede verse afectada significativamente por el material de obturación intermedio.

3.
Braz. dent. sci ; 23(1): 1-6, 2020. tab
Article in English | LILACS, BBO | ID: biblio-1049407

ABSTRACT

Objective: this study aimed to evaluate the effects of irrigants and dry canal on the accuracy of electronic apex locator (EAL) in locating simulated root perforations. Material and methods: twenty singlerooted, mandibular premolars were decoronated at CEJ, and the contents were removed with a barbed broach. The canals were instrumented up to a size of 15 K-file. The roots were artificially perforated at 4 mm from the anatomic apex. The actual length (AL) up to the perforation site was determined. The electronic length (EL) of perforations was obtained by Root ZX mini and iRoot in the dry canal and in the presence of 5.2% NaOCl, SmearOff, and 0.9% sodium chloride using a size 20 K-file. The differences between the EL and AL of the perforations were calculated. Statistical analyses using Friedman and Wilcoxon signed-rank tests were used to analyse the data with the level of significance set at p <0.05. Results: there were significant differences in different canal conditions with both Root ZX mini and i Root. Measurements in dry canals were significantly longer for both apex locators (p <0.05). Measurements with NaOCl were significantly shorter for both apex locators (p < 0.05). Both apex locators produced significantly accurate values for Saline and Smear OFF (p < 0.05). Conclusions: in this study, both Root ZX mini and i Root were affected by different canal conditions. The most accurate measurements were seen in the presence of saline and SmearOFF. (AU)


Objetivo: este estudo teve como objetivo avaliar os efeitos de irrigantes e canal seco na precisão do localizador apical eletrônico (EAL) em localizar perfurações radiculares simuladas. Material e métodos: vinte pré-molares inferiores unirradiculares tiveram suas coroas removidas na altura da JEC e o tecido pulpar removido com um extirpa nervos. Os canais foram instrumentados até a largura de uma lima k 15. As raízes foram perfuradas artificialmente a 4 mm do ápice anatômico. O comprimento real (AL) até o local da perfuração foi determinado. O comprimento eletrônico (EL) das perfurações foi obtido pelo Root ZX mini e iRoot no canal seco e na presença de 5,2% de NaOCl, SmearOff e 0,9% de cloreto de sódio usando uma lima K tamanho 20. As diferenças entre o EL e o AL das perfurações foram calculadas. Análises estatísticas, utilizando os testes de sinais por postos de Friedman e Wilcoxon, foram realizadas para analisar os dados com o nível de significância estabelecido em p < 0,05. Resultados: houve diferenças significativas nas diferentes condições do canal, tanto no Root ZX mini quanto no i Root. As medidas em canais secos foram significativamente maiores nos dois localizadores apicais (p < 0,05). As medidas com NaOCl foram significativamente mais curtas para os dois localizadores apicais (p<0,05). Ambos os localizadores apicais produziram valores significativamente precisos para Saline e Smear OFF (p < 0,05). Conclusões: neste estudo, tanto o Root ZX mini quanto o i Root foram afetados por diferentes condições do canal. As medidas mais precisa foram observadas na presença de soro fisiológico e SmearOFF. (AU)


Subject(s)
Sodium Hypochlorite , Bicuspid , Dental Equipment , Oral and Dental Hygiene Products
4.
Article | IMSEAR | ID: sea-189032

ABSTRACT

The determination of working length and its maintenance during cleaning and shaping procedures is a key factor for successful endodontic treatment. The aim of this in- vitro study was to evaluate the utility and accuracy of Raypex5 electronic apex locator in determining the working length in comparison to conventional radiography and radiovisiography in posterior teeth. Methods: In this study sixty extracted mandibular first and second molars were used. Diagnostic images were obtained both by conventional radiography and radiovisiography (RVG) and tentative working length was obtained and recorded. After access opening actual root canal length was determined by both conventional radiography and RVG and recorded. Four blinded observers determined the working length in all samples with Raypex5 electronic apex locator. Then at that length file position was checked using RVG. Results: All the data collected was statistically analyzed using one way analysis of variance (ANOVA), Cronbach’s alpha reability analysis and student paired t-test. Conclusion: In this study it was found that Electronic apexlocator Raypex 92 %, RVG 74% and conventional radiograph was 70% accurate in measuring root canal length in posterior teeth.

5.
Int. j. odontostomatol. (Print) ; 13(3): 287-291, set. 2019. tab
Article in English | LILACS | ID: biblio-1012424

ABSTRACT

ABSTRACT: The apical limit of tooth roots for instrumentation and obturation is a controversial subject due to the high morphological complexity presented by the apical zone of the root. The development of electronic apex locators (EALs) has made working length (WL) determination more predictable, producing more accurate results; however, the interpretation mechanisms of different devices may affect measurements taken under different clinical conditions. One hundred premolars were used to compare the effectiveness of Propex II, Raypex 6, Propex Pixi and Root ZX II in locating the apical foramen (AF). No statistically significant differences were observed when the accuracy of measurement was compared between the different groups of EALs, however Root ZX II and Raypex 6 presented the best overall performance.


RESUMEN: El límite apical radicular para la instrumentación y obturación es un tema controversial, debido a la alta complejidad morfológica que presenta la zona apical de la raíz. El desarrollo de localizadores de ápice electrónicos (EALs) ha hecho la determinación de la longitud de trabajo (WL) más predecible y con resultados más precisos. Sin embargo, el mecanismo de interpretación de cada dispositivo puede afectar la determinación de las mediciones en diferentes condiciones clínicas. Cien premolares fueron utilizados para comparar la efectividad de Propex II, Raypex 6, Propex Pixi y Root ZX II en localizar el foramen apical (AF). No se observaron diferencias estadísticamente significativas cuando se comparó la precisión de medición entre los diferentes grupos de EALs, sin embargo, Root ZX II y Raypex 6 mostraron un mejor desempeño global.


Subject(s)
Humans , Root Canal Preparation/instrumentation , Tooth Apex/anatomy & histology , Dental Pulp Cavity/anatomy & histology , Electrical Equipment and Supplies/standards , Odontometry/instrumentation , Chile , Tooth Apex/diagnostic imaging , Dental Pulp Cavity/diagnostic imaging
6.
Article | IMSEAR | ID: sea-187072

ABSTRACT

Background: Exact estimation of root canal length is imperative for the achievement of root canal treatment. Working length (WL) has been defined as „„the distance from a coronal reference point to the point at which canal preparation and obturation should terminate‟‟. Aim: The aim of this study was to evaluate and compare the accuracy of two generations of apex locators in teeth with simulated apical root resorption using stainless steel and nickel titanium hand files. Materials and methods: Eighty single-rooted, maxillary anterior teeth were selected. The extracted teeth were soaked in 5% sodium hypochlorite for 6 hours and then in sterile 0.9% saline until use. An oblique cut of 45 degree was made from facial to palatal wall. Access cavities were prepared and the Haneen Al Otheem, Swati Srivastava, Shahad Alogayyel, Maymonah Abdurhman Alghadouni. Comparative analysis of two electronic apex locators in working length determination using stainless steel and nickel titanium hand files in permanent teeth with simulated apical root resorption - An in vitro study. IAIM, 2018; 5(5): 45-50. Page 46 Visual Working Length (VWL) was measured. The samples were then embedded in alginate and the electronic measurements were recorded using stainless steel and nickel titanium hand files. Statistical analysis was done by Analysis of variance (ANOVA) followed by Tukey HSD test were used for statistical analysis. Results: There was no statistically significant difference seen with DentaPort ZX and i-Root along with the use of stainless steel and NiTi hand files. Conclusion: In the present study, DentaPort ZX and i-Root apex locators showed similar efficacy in determining working length with the use of both stainless steel and NiTi hand files under present study conditions

7.
Rev. Asoc. Odontol. Argent ; 105(2): 36-41, jun. 2017. tab, ilus
Article in Spanish | LILACS | ID: biblio-908055

ABSTRACT

Objetivo: evaluar la capacitación y los resultados del uso de localizadores del foramen en un curso preclínico destinado a alumnos de grado de la Escuela de Odontología de la Universidad del Salvador / AsociaciónOdontológica Argentina, entre 2005 y 2016. Materiales y métodos: Se emplearon 2053 incisivos, caninos y premolares inferiores y superiores humanos extraídos. Los dientes se montaron de modo tal que sus raí-ces quedasen sumergidas en una solución salina, utilizando dos métodos: a) tubos de plástico, b) modelos que simulan la arcada dentaria. Se realizaron los accesos coronarios al conducto radicular de forma convencional y se prepararonlos tercios cervical y medio. Para determinar la longitud de trabajo, se introdujo una lima tipo K de calibre acorde con el conducto radicular, ajustando en ella el terminal del localizador electrónico del foramen. El terminal labial se sumergió en la misma solución salina en que se encontraban las raíces dentarias. En la mayoría de los dientes se empleó, parala determinación, la técnica de ingreso, y en los restantes, la de regreso. El nivel de penetración se estableció con la señal lumínica y/o sonora de 0,5. Se ajustó el tope del instrumento al borde de referencia y se obtuvo una imagen radiográfica periapical del diente evaluado. Se retiró el instrumento del conducto radicular y se midió desde su punta hasta el tope respectivo. Las medidas obtenidas con los localizadores electrónicos del foramen se compararon con las conductometrías radiográficas, considerando una tolerancia de 0,5 mm. Para la evaluación estadística, se tomó en cuenta el cálculo de intervalo deconfianza (95 por ciento) realizado a partir de la distribución binomial.Resultados: De los 2053 dientes en los cuales se determinó la longitud de trabajo, 1743 (84,9 por ciento) fueron consideradas medidas correctas, y 310 (15,1 por ciento), incorrectas...


Aim: To assess the training process and results of the useof electronic apex locators in an Aim: To assess the training process and results of the useof electronic apex locators in an undergraduate preclinicalcourse for students from the University del Salvador / AsociaciónOdontológica Argentina between 2005 and 2016.Materials and methods: Two thousand fifty threeextracted human incisors, canines, maxillary and mandibularbicuspid teeth were used. The teeth were mounted withthe roots submerged in saline solution using two methods: a) plastic tubes, b) models simulating the dental arch. Conventionalcoronal access to the root canal was performedand the cervical and middle portions of the root canal wereflared. To determine the working length a K-file with a caliberaccording to the root canal was selected for each tooth andintroduced in the root canal with the clip adjusted in the file.The labial clip was immersed in the model saline solution. Inthe majority of the teeth the advanced and withdrawal techniquewas employed. The level of penetration was establishedusing the light and/or the acoustic signal at 0.5. Then, the rubberstop was adjusted to the reference line and a radiographwas obtained. The instrument was removed and measuredfrom its tip to the rubber stop. The measurements obtainedwith the electronic apex locators were compared with thoseobtained from the X rays considering a tolerance of 0.5 mm.For the statistical evaluation, 95% confidence intervals werecalculated using the binomial distribution.Results: Out of 2053 teeth in which the working lengthwas determined, 1743 (84.9%) were considered correct measurementsand 310 (15.1%) incorrects...


Subject(s)
Humans , Education, Predental/methods , Endodontics/education , Odontometry/methods , Tooth Apex/anatomy & histology , Bicuspid/anatomy & histology , Cuspid/anatomy & histology , Electric Impedance/therapeutic use , Incisor/anatomy & histology , Data Interpretation, Statistical
8.
RGO (Porto Alegre) ; 64(3): 244-249, July-Sept. 2016. tab
Article in English | LILACS | ID: lil-796293

ABSTRACT

ABSTRACT Objective: The aim of the study was to evaluate performance of digital radiographic and two electronic apex locators, Propex II and Root ZX in root canal length determination in primary molars. Methods: 25 primary molars were divided into two groups, G1 without root resorption and G2 with root resorption. The exams were performed using all methods by two experienced examiners, with 1-week interval. The gold standard was determined by visual examination. The methods were statistically analyzed regarding the values of reproducibility and correlated with the gold standard by Pearson´s correlation coefficient. Results: The root canal length determination coincided with gold standard in 22.7% for Root ZX, 17.5% for Propex II and 12.5% for digital radiography. Correlation values were higher in G1, the Root ZX presented the highest values. In G2 the digital radiography showed the lowest correlation. In G1, the intra-examiner reproducibility values ranged from 0.925 to 0.523, and interexaminer 0.863 to 0.670. In G2, the values of intra-examiner reproducibility ranges from 0.864 to 0.097, and inter was 0.774 to 0.379. Conclusion: It was concluded that the methods performance varying according to examiner's experience. The Root ZX presented the highest reproducibility and accuracy.


RESUMO Objetivo: Avaliar o desempenho in vitro de radiografia digital e de dois localizadores apicais eletrônicos, Propex II e Root ZX na determinação do comprimento de canal em molares decíduos. Métodos: Foram selecionados 25 molares decíduos divididos em dois grupos, G1, sem reabsorção radicular e G2 com reabsorção radicular. Os exames foram realizados utilizando todos os métodos por dois examinadores experientes, com intervalo de 1 semana. O padrão ouro foi determinada por exame visual. Os métodos foram analisados estatisticamente em relação aos valores de reprodutibilidade e correlacionada com o padrão ouro pelo coeficiente de correlação de Pearson. Resultados: A determinação de comprimento de canal coincidiu com padrão-ouro em 22,7% para o Root ZX, 17,5% para Propex II e 12,5% para a radiografia digital. valores de correlação foram maiores no G1, o Root ZX apresentou os maiores valores. Em G2 da radiografia digital apresentou a menor correlação. No G1, os valores de reprodutibilidade intra-examinador variou 0,925-0,523 e interexaminadores 0,863-0,670. No G2, os valores da reprodutibilidade intra-examinador varia 0,864-0,097, e inter era 0,774-0,379. Conclusão: Concluiu-se que o desempenho dos métodos varia de acordo com a experiência do examinador. O Root ZX apresentou maior reprodutibilidade e precisão.

9.
Restorative Dentistry & Endodontics ; : 6-11, 2016.
Article in English | WPRIM | ID: wpr-130034

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVES: The purpose of this in vitro study was to evaluate the accuracy of working length (WL) determination of four electronic apex locators (EALs), namely, Root ZX (RZX), Elements diagnostic unit and apex locator (ELE), SybronEndo Mini Apex locator (MINI) and Propex pixi (PIXI) using Stainless steel (SS) and nickel-titanium (NiTi) hand files. The null hypothesis was that there was no difference between canal length determination by SS and NiTi files of 4 EALs. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Sixty extracted, single rooted human teeth were decoronated and the canal orifice flared. The actual length (AL) was assessed visually, and the teeth were embedded in an alginate model. The electronic length (EL) measurements were recorded with all four EALs using SS and NiTi files at '0.5' reading on display. The differences between the AL and EL were compared. RESULTS: The results obtained with each EAL with SS and NiTi files were compared with AL. A paired sample t test showed that there was a statistical significant difference between EAL readings with SS and NiTi files for RZX and MINI (p < 0.05). The accuracy of RZX, ELE, MINI and PIXI within +/- 0.5 mm of AL with SS/NiTi files were 93.3%/70%, 90%/91.7%, 95%/68.3%, and 83.3%/83.3%, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: The results of this study indicate that Root ZX was statistically more accurate with NiTi files compared to SS files, while MINI was statistically more accurate with SS files compared to NiTi files. ELE and PIXI were not affected by the alloy type of the file used to determine WL.


Subject(s)
Humans , Alloys , Hand , Reading , Stainless Steel , Tooth
10.
Restorative Dentistry & Endodontics ; : 6-11, 2016.
Article in English | WPRIM | ID: wpr-130019

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVES: The purpose of this in vitro study was to evaluate the accuracy of working length (WL) determination of four electronic apex locators (EALs), namely, Root ZX (RZX), Elements diagnostic unit and apex locator (ELE), SybronEndo Mini Apex locator (MINI) and Propex pixi (PIXI) using Stainless steel (SS) and nickel-titanium (NiTi) hand files. The null hypothesis was that there was no difference between canal length determination by SS and NiTi files of 4 EALs. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Sixty extracted, single rooted human teeth were decoronated and the canal orifice flared. The actual length (AL) was assessed visually, and the teeth were embedded in an alginate model. The electronic length (EL) measurements were recorded with all four EALs using SS and NiTi files at '0.5' reading on display. The differences between the AL and EL were compared. RESULTS: The results obtained with each EAL with SS and NiTi files were compared with AL. A paired sample t test showed that there was a statistical significant difference between EAL readings with SS and NiTi files for RZX and MINI (p < 0.05). The accuracy of RZX, ELE, MINI and PIXI within +/- 0.5 mm of AL with SS/NiTi files were 93.3%/70%, 90%/91.7%, 95%/68.3%, and 83.3%/83.3%, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: The results of this study indicate that Root ZX was statistically more accurate with NiTi files compared to SS files, while MINI was statistically more accurate with SS files compared to NiTi files. ELE and PIXI were not affected by the alloy type of the file used to determine WL.


Subject(s)
Humans , Alloys , Hand , Reading , Stainless Steel , Tooth
11.
Int. j. morphol ; 33(3): 1136-1140, Sept. 2015. ilus
Article in English | LILACS | ID: lil-762598

ABSTRACT

Within the procedures involved in a successful endodontic treatment is the working length (WL) determination. The root canal end must be detected accurately, and a precise control of the WL must be maintained. There are several methods to determine WL. Researchers have published the average teeth length (ATL) to the human permanent dentition. These measurements are used as an anatomical reference. If the WL is evaluated using a radiographic image, it is accepted as clinical success if the limit of the canal sealing is 1 mm coronal to the root apex. One method to determine WL is based in substract 1 mm to ATL. Another method widely used, assert to achieve a more precise WL determination, through the use of an electronic apex locator (AL). Nevertheless, published measures of ATL are still used as anatomical reference, and are used to determine WL in the absence of an AL. The aim of this study was to determine the average WL of second molars and premolars with endodontic treatment indication using a PropexII® AL, and compare these measurements to WL determination using ATL method. A descriptive cross-sectional study with a non-random sample of consecutive cases was executed. Results showed that there were no statistically significant differences between the WL obtained with AL and ATL method in studied teeth, except mesio-buccal canal of second maxillary molars (19.94 mm average using AL, 1.54 mm greater than ATL method 18.40 mm; p= 0.002). The ATL method to determine WL could be used to determine the WL of second molars and premolars in studied population. Further research should be performed to determine if ATL method is safe and reliable to be used in absence of an AL or in patients where this instrument cannot be used.


Entre los procedimientos involucrados en un tratamiento endodóntico exitoso está la determinación de longitud de trabajo (LT). Esta debe mantenerse durante todo el tratamiento, y el extremo del canal radicular (CR) debe detectarse con precisión. Existen varios métodos para determinar LT; los investigadores han publicado la longitud total promedio (LTP) de la dentición permanente humana. Estas mediciones se utilizan como referencia anatómica. Si LT se evalúa usando una imagen radiográfica, se acepta como éxito clínico cuando el límite de la obturación radicular queda 1 mm coronal al ápice radicular. Un método para determinar LT se basa en restar 1 mm a la LTP. Otro método, que permite una determinación de LT más precisa, se realiza utilizando un localizador apical electrónico (LA). Pese a esto último, las medidas publicadas de LTP todavía se utilizan como referencia anatómica, para determinar LT en ausencia de un LA. El objetivo fue determinar LT promedio de los CR de segundos molares y premolares con indicación de endodoncia utilizando LA PropexII®, y comparar estas mediciones con la LT determinada utilizando el método de LTP. Se realizó un estudio descriptivo de corte transversal con una muestra no probabilística de casos consecutivos. No hubo diferencias estadísticamente significativas entre la LT obtenida con LA y el método LTP en los dientes estudiados, salvo en los canales mesio-bucales de segundos molares superiores (19,94mm promedio usando LA, 1,54 mm mayor que el método LTP: 18,40 mm; p= 0,002). El método para definir LT a través de LTP podría utilizarse para determinar LT de segundos molares y premolares en la población estudiada. Se requieren investigaciones posteriores para determinar si el método que utiliza LTP es confiable para ser utilizado en ausencia de un LA o en pacientes en los que este instrumento no pueda ocuparse.


Subject(s)
Humans , Male , Female , Dental Pulp Cavity/anatomy & histology , Molar/anatomy & histology , Odontometry/methods , Tooth Apex/anatomy & histology , Cross-Sectional Studies , Electrical Equipment and Supplies , Odontometry/instrumentation
12.
J. oral res. (Impresa) ; 4(4): 249-254, ago.2015. ilus, tab
Article in English | LILACS | ID: lil-779226

ABSTRACT

This study was to evaluate in vivo the accuracy of three electronic apex locators (EALs) in determining working length (WL) using hand files and a wear technique. Thirty two premolars that were completely formed apically and that were scheduled for extraction for orthodontic reasons from patients between ages of 15 and 20 years old were included. Electronic measurement of WL was performed using the EAL according to the manufacturer’s instructions. The following three EAL were used: A. Root ZX II; B. Raypex 5, and C. Propex II. There were significant difference (p=0.0002) when comparing median differences among the three EAL. Statistical analysis revealed significant differences between Root ZX II vs. Raypex 5 and Root ZX II vs. Propex II (p=0.0044; p=0.0002), while between aypex 5 and Propex II, there were no statistically significant differences with respect to the accuracy of the EAL in determining WL (p=0.1087). The present findings suggest that Root ZX II presented the highest agreement rate for determining the final WL...


Estudio fue evaluar in vivo la exactitud de tres localizadores apicales electrónicos(LAEs) para determinar la longitud de trabajo (LT) usando instrumentos manuales y una técnica de desgaste. Treinta y dos premolares con formación apical completa e indicados para extracción por razones ortodóncicas de pacientes de edad entre 15 y 20 años fueron incluidos en el estudio. Seusaron tres LAE; A. Root ZX II; B. Raypex 5, y C. Propex II. Se encontraron diferencias significativas (p=0.0002) cuando se compararon las medianas entre los tres LAE. El análisismostró diferencias entre Root ZX II vs. Raypex 5 y Root ZX II vs. Propex II (p=0.0044; p=0,0002), mientras queentre Raypex 5 y Propex II, no se encontraron diferencias estadísticamente significativas en la determinación de la LT (p=0.1087). Los presentes hallazgos sugieren que Root ZX II mostró la mayor exactitud para determinar la LT final...


Subject(s)
Humans , Male , Adolescent , Adult , Female , Young Adult , Tooth Apex/anatomy & histology , Dental Pulp Cavity/anatomy & histology , Odontometry/instrumentation , Root Canal Preparation/instrumentation , Electrical Equipment and Supplies
13.
Article in English | LILACS | ID: lil-796382

ABSTRACT

To evaluate the use of electronic apex locator to measure the root canal length in primary teeth, comparing this measure with the measurements obtained by conventional radiography and by the direct measurement of the root canal lenght.Material and Methods:The sample consisted of nine multi-rooted primary teeth, totaling 32 root canals. Endodontic access was performed with a spherical diamond tip, then the pulp was extirpated and the canal irrigated with 0.9% saline. An endodontic file was used to measure the root canal length by electronic apex locator, using the Novapex ® according to the manufacturer's instructions, and by direct method. An endodontic ruler was used to determine fileÆs length. Conventional radiographic was also performed. Statistical analysis was performed by analysis of variance (ANOVA). The level of significance was 95%.Results:The average of the root canal length was 9.98 ± 2.16 to the direct method; 11.52 ± 1.87 to conventional radiography; and 10.91 ± 1.92 to the electronic apex locator. The results of this study showed a high correlation between the values given by the different methods, regardless of the presence or absence of physiological root resorption. There were not statistically significant differences amongst the methods studied (p> 0.05).Conclusion:Electronic apex locator was an accurate method measure the root canal length in primary teeth, and its use is indicated in endodontic treatment of these teeth...


Subject(s)
Humans , Dental Pulp Cavity , Tooth, Deciduous/anatomy & histology , Risk Measurement Equipment , Odontometry/methods , Analysis of Variance , Brazil , Radiography, Dental
14.
Restorative Dentistry & Endodontics ; : 44-49, 2015.
Article in English | WPRIM | ID: wpr-105470

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVES: This study compared the ability of several techniques to remove calcium hydroxide (CH) from the root canal and determined the influence of CH residues on the accuracy of the electronic apex locator. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Root canals of 90 human maxillary lateral incisors with confirmed true working length (TWL) were prepared and filled with CH. The teeth were randomly assigned to one of the experimental groups according to the CH removal technique (n = 14): 0.9% saline; 0.9% saline + master apical file (MAF); 17% ethylenediamine tetraacetic acid (EDTA); 17% EDTA + MAF; 5.25% sodium hypochlorite (NaOCl); 5.25% NaOCl + MAF. Six teeth were used as negative control. After CH removal, the electronic working length was measured using Root-ZX (Morita Corp.) and compared with TWL to evaluate Root-ZX accuracy. All specimens were sectioned longitudinally, and the area of remaining CH (CH) and total canal area were measured using imaging software. RESULTS: The EDTA + MAF and NaOCl + MAF groups showed better CH removal than other groups (p 85% within a tolerance of +/- 1.0 mm (p < 0.05). There was strong negative correlation between amount of CH residues and EAL accuracy (r = -0.800 for +/- 0.5 mm; r = -0.940 for +/- 1.0 mm). CONCLUSIONS: The mechanical instrumentation improves the CH removal of irrigation solutions although none of the techniques removed the dressing completely. Residues of CH medication in root canals affected the accuracy of Root-ZX adversely.


Subject(s)
Humans , Bandages , Calcium Hydroxide , Dental Pulp Cavity , Edetic Acid , Incisor , Sodium Hypochlorite , Tooth
15.
Restorative Dentistry & Endodontics ; : 113-122, 2015.
Article in English | WPRIM | ID: wpr-137555

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVES: The aim of this paper was evaluating the ratios of electrical impedance measurements reported in previous studies through a correlation analysis in order to explicit it as the contributing factor to the accuracy of electronic apex locator (EAL). MATERIALS AND METHODS: The literature regarding electrical property measurements of EALs was screened using Medline and Embase. All data acquired were plotted to identify correlations between impedance and log-scaled frequency. The accuracy of the impedance ratio method used to detect the apical constriction (APC) in most EALs was evaluated using linear ramp function fitting. Changes of impedance ratios for various frequencies were evaluated for a variety of file positions. RESULTS: Among the ten papers selected in the search process, the first-order equations between log-scaled frequency and impedance were in the negative direction. When the model for the ratios was assumed to be a linear ramp function, the ratio values decreased if the file went deeper and the average ratio values of the left and right horizontal zones were significantly different in 8 out of 9 studies. The APC was located within the interval of linear relation between the left and right horizontal zones of the linear ramp model. CONCLUSIONS: Using the ratio method, the APC was located within a linear interval. Therefore, using the impedance ratio between electrical impedance measurements at different frequencies was a robust method for detection of the APC.


Subject(s)
Architectural Accessibility , Constriction , Electric Impedance , Endodontics
16.
Restorative Dentistry & Endodontics ; : 113-122, 2015.
Article in English | WPRIM | ID: wpr-137554

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVES: The aim of this paper was evaluating the ratios of electrical impedance measurements reported in previous studies through a correlation analysis in order to explicit it as the contributing factor to the accuracy of electronic apex locator (EAL). MATERIALS AND METHODS: The literature regarding electrical property measurements of EALs was screened using Medline and Embase. All data acquired were plotted to identify correlations between impedance and log-scaled frequency. The accuracy of the impedance ratio method used to detect the apical constriction (APC) in most EALs was evaluated using linear ramp function fitting. Changes of impedance ratios for various frequencies were evaluated for a variety of file positions. RESULTS: Among the ten papers selected in the search process, the first-order equations between log-scaled frequency and impedance were in the negative direction. When the model for the ratios was assumed to be a linear ramp function, the ratio values decreased if the file went deeper and the average ratio values of the left and right horizontal zones were significantly different in 8 out of 9 studies. The APC was located within the interval of linear relation between the left and right horizontal zones of the linear ramp model. CONCLUSIONS: Using the ratio method, the APC was located within a linear interval. Therefore, using the impedance ratio between electrical impedance measurements at different frequencies was a robust method for detection of the APC.


Subject(s)
Architectural Accessibility , Constriction , Electric Impedance , Endodontics
17.
Braz. dent. j ; 25(1): 12-16, Jan-Feb/2014. tab
Article in English | LILACS | ID: lil-709394

ABSTRACT

The aim of this study was to compare in vivo the accuracy of two electronic foramen locators (EFLs) based on different operation systems - Root ZX and Propex II. Ten healthy adult patients needing premolar extractions due to orthodontic reasons participated in the study, providing a sample of 17 noncarious, non-restored, vital teeth (n= 24 canals). After coronal access preparation and cervical preflaring and prior to tooth extraction, the root canal length was measured alternating the two EFLs. All measurements were performed with K-files well fitted to the canal diameter at the level that each EFL indicated the apical foramen in their display (APEX or 0.0). The last K-file were fixed in place with cyanoacrylate, the tooth was extracted, and the apical 4 mm of each root were resected to measure the distance between the file tip and the apical foramen. The mean errors based on the absolute values of discrepancies were 0.30 ± 0.29 mm (Root ZX) and 0.32 ± 0.27 mm (Propex II). Analysis by the Wilcoxon test for paired samples showed no statistically significant differences between the electronic canal measurements performed with the EFLs (p=0.587). The apical foramen was accurately located in 75% (Root ZX) and 66.7% (Propex II) of the cases, considering a ±0.5 mm error margin, with no statistically significant difference by the chi-square test. Despite having different measurement mechanisms, both EFLs were capable of locating the apical foramen with high accuracy in vivo. Under the tested clinical conditions, Root ZX and Propex II displayed similar results.


O presente estudo teve como objetivo avaliar, in vivo, a precisão de dois localizadores eletrônicos foraminais (LEFs) baseados em diferentes mecanismos de funcionamento, Root ZX e Propex II, na determinação do forame apical, sendo utilizados nos mesmos dentes. Após o acesso coronário e o pré-alargamento, e anteriormente à exodontia, os comprimentos de 24 canais radiculares foram determinados eletronicamente alternando-se os dois LEFs. As odontometrias foram realizadas até que os dispositivos apontassem o FA (APEX), utilizando-se limas tipo-K ajustadas. O último instrumento utilizado foi fixado em posição, o dente extraído e os 4,0 mm apicais de cada canal desgastados de forma a possibilitar a determinação da distância entre a ponta dos instrumentos e o forame apical. Os erros médios em função dos valores absolutos das discrepâncias foram, respectivamente, 0,30 ± 0,29 mm (Root ZX) e 0,32 ± 0,27 mm (Propex II). A análise estatística realizada por meio do teste de Wilcoxon para amostras pareadas demonstrou a semelhança entre as determinações do forame apical realizadas pelos dois LEFs (p=0,587). O comprimento radicular até o forame apical foi corretamente determinado em 75% (Root ZX) e 66,7% (Propex II) dos casos, considerando margem de ± 0,5 mm, sem diferenças estatísticas quando analisados pelo teste qui-quadrado. Os LEFs avaliados e consequentemente seus mecanismos de funcionamento, foram capazes de determinar o comprimento dos canais radiculares com precisão em condições in vivo. Nas condições do presente estudo, Root ZX e Propex II apresentaram resultados semelhantes.


Subject(s)
Adolescent , Adult , Humans , Young Adult , Electronics , Root Canal Therapy , Tooth Extraction
18.
Rev. Salusvita (Online) ; 33(2)2014. ilus
Article in Portuguese | LILACS | ID: lil-737175

ABSTRACT

Um dos fatores determinantes para o sucesso do tratamento endodôntico é a determinação correta do comprimento de trabalho, pois através dele que elegemos o limite da instrumentação e da obturação evitando assim injúrias aos tecidos periapicais. Objetivo: O presente estudo teve como objetivo realizar uma análise comparativa in vitro da precisão de três localizadores foraminais, sendo eles Root ZX mini, Joypex 5 e T-Root VI. Método: Foram selecionados 30 dentes incisivos inferiores humanos extraídos. Após o acesso coronário, foi realizada a mensuração com o auxilio de um instrumento tipo K n°10 até sua ponta ser observada no forame apical com ajuda de um microscópio cirúrgico com x 50 de magnificação. Os dentes foram imersos em recipiente de plástico contendo alginato, e mensurados com os três localizadores foraminais calibrados em "Apex". Foi considerado Preciso, se a mensuração foi coincidente com comprimento real do dente; Aceitável, se a distância da medida for ate 0,5mm aquém do forame apical; e Errônea, se os valores das medidas forem menores que a medida Aceitável ou forem além do comprimento real do dente. Os dados foram submetidos aos testes de ANOVA e Tuckey (p<0,05). Resultados: Os valores observados mostraram não haver diferença estatisticamente significante (p>0.05) entre as medidas realizadas com os localizadores e o comprimento real do dente. Conclusão: Os resultados confirmam que todos dispositivos eletrônicos avaliados podem determinar com precisão o comprimento do canal radicular...


One of the most relevant factors for the success of endodontic treatment is the correct determination of the working length, since it will determine the limit of shaping and filling avoiding injuries to the periapical tissues. Objective: The aim of the present study was to compare the accuracy of three electronic apex locators: Root ZX mini, Joypex 5 and T- Root IV. Method: Thirty extracted single-rooted human incisors, extracted for reasons not related to this study, were selected and accessed. Then, the measurement of the specimens was determinated by inserting a size 10 K-file into the root canal until its tip was visible at the apical foramen by using surgical microscope at X50 magnification. The teeth were embedded in an alginate model and the analysis using the apex locators were made. The measurement restricted to 00 mm of the apical foramen (real tooth length) was classified as accurate, if the distance was determinated 0.5 mm short of the apical foramen as acceptable, and if the values of the measures were larger or smaller than the acceptable measures was classified as inaccurate. Statistical analysis was performed using ANOVA and Tuckey test (p < 0.05) Results: There were no significant differences among the three groups when electronic apex locators were used (p> 0.05). Conclusions: The results confirm that all these electronic devices can accurately determine the root canal length...


Subject(s)
Dental Pulp Cavity/surgery , Endodontics/instrumentation , Odontometry/instrumentation
19.
Braz. dent. sci ; 16(4): 99-104, 2013. ilus
Article in English | LILACS, BBO | ID: lil-728089

ABSTRACT

Introduction: The aim of this case report is to demonstrate the retreatment of a maxillary canine diagnosed with a horizontal root fracture utilizing an electronic apex locator and monitored with cone beam computed tomography. Case Report: A 35 year old African American male was referred for root canal retreatment of a maxillary right canine prior to prosthetic rehabilitation. Following removal of gutta percha, an apex locator was utilized to determine the length of the root canal. After a more comprehensive dental history, the patient confirmed a previously unreported history of dental trauma at this time, leading to the suspicion of a horizontal root fracture. Clinical microscopy detected a connective tissue in the apical third of the root canal and multiple periapical and occlusal radiographs enhanced visualization of a horizontal root fracture. The coronal segment was filled with an MTA apical plug and the apical segment remained stable. A recall after 1.5 years was performed with CBCT, which showed no apical radiolucency. Discussion: The present case report reinforces the precept that detailed dental history and careful observation of radiographs are critical factors for obtaining an accurate diagnosis. Fundamental adjuncts, such as microscopy, apex locators and CBCT imaging, can potentially aid in the diagnosis and the subsequent treatment plan of horizontal root fracture


Introdução: O objetivo deste estudo foi mostrar o passo-a-passo do diagnóstico de uma fratura horizontal durante um retratamento, utilizando o localizador apical e a tomografia de feixe cônico como auxiliares do diagnóstico clínico. Relato de caso: Um paciente de 35 anos do gênero masculino afro-americano foi encaminhado com necessidade de retratamento no canino superior direito para posterior reabilitação protética. Seguida da remoção da guta-percha, foi utilizado o localizador apical para determinar o comprimento real do dente. Após uma melhor investigação sobre a história dental do paciente, o paciente confirmou uma história de trauma dental até então não comentada durante a anamnese, levando a suspeita de fratura horizontal no comprimento onde o localizador marcava a posição 0,0. Com o microscópio clínico detectou-se a presença de tecido granulomatoso no terço apical e, através de múltiplas radiografias periapical e uma oclusal foi possível visualizar a fratura horizontal. O segmento coronário instrumentado foi selado com um plug de MTA e, mantido o segmento apical sem tratamento. A proservação após um ano e meio foi realizada com CBCT, não presentando quaisquer alterações periapicais. Discussão: O presente relato de caso reforça ainda mais a necessidade de uma anamnese e história dental detalhada e cuidadosa observação radiográfica como fatores críticos para um diagnóstico preciso. Ferramentas auxiliares, como o microscópio, localizador apical e tomografia podem adicionar ao diagnóstico e consequentemente ao planejamento de fraturas horizontais.


Subject(s)
Humans , Male , Adult , Cone-Beam Computed Tomography , Cuspid , Radiography
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL