ABSTRACT
@#Objective To observe the short-term therapeutic outcomes of atrial septal defects (ASD) repair using on-pump beating-heart technique assisted by robotic surgery system (Da Vinci Si) or thoracoscopy. Methods Clinical data of 50 patients undergoing ASD repair at the First Affiliated Hospital of Anhui Medical University from January 2015 to December 2018 were retrospectively analyzed. According to the different surgical methods, patients were divided into a robot group and a total thoracoscopy group. In the robot group, there were 35 patients including 11 males and 24 females, at an average age of 42.1±16.8 years, and in the total thoracoscopy group there were 15 patients including 8 males and 7 females at an average age of 38.4±10.9 years. During follow-up, the left ventricular ejection fraction, left and right atrial diameter, and right ventricular end-diastolic diameter in the cardiac Doppler echocardiography were recorded. The operation time, extracorporeal circulation time, ventilation time, postoperative ICU stay, postoperative hospital stay, perioperative pleural drainage and early complications were compared between the two groups. Results In the perioperative period, the robot group had less operation time (3.8±0.3 h vs. 6.1±1.4 h), extracorporeal circulation time (72.3 ± 10.4 min vs. 139.1 ± 32.8 min), ventilation time (5.5±1.2 h vs. 9.5 ± 2.1 h), postoperative hospital stay (6.7±0.5 d vs. 9.8 ± 0.6 d) and thoracic drainage (253.4±26.8 mL vs. 289.3 ± 29.5 mL) than the total thoracoscopy group (P<0.05), while the postoperative complications were not statistically significant between the two groups (P>0.05). All patients were reviewed by color Doppler ultrasound at 1 month after operation. The postoperative dilated right atrium, right ventricle and left atrium were smaller than those before surgery. Conclusion For patients undergoing ASD repair, robot-assisted and total thoracoscopy can achieve good results, but the robot group has more advantages in terms of operation time, extracorporeal circulation time, ventilation time, postoperative hospital stay and thoracic drainage.
ABSTRACT
Minimally invasive cardiac surgery including robotic technique has become increasingly popular over the last decade. The advantages of such technique include improved cosmesis and healing, and reduced stress response, hospital and intensive care unit stay, and transfusion requirements. Robot-assisted cardiac surgery requires prolonged one-lung ventilation to optimize exposure. Remote-access perfusion requires appropriate positioning of multiple catheters to establish cardiopulmonary bypass. Carbon dioxide insufflation into the thorax can cause hemodynamic instability and carbon dioxide embolism. Limited exposure of the heart may pose difficulties with management of arrhythmia, hemostasis, myocardial protection and de-airing at the end of surgery. Limited access due to robot manipulator would make rapid intervention for cardiopulmonary resuscitation difficult or impossible. This case report describes robot-asssisted atrial septal defect repair and discusses the anesthetic issues associated with minimally invasive cardiac surgery including robotic cardiac surgery.